Skip to main content

Illegal Termination and Salary Due Recovery

 What is Illegal or Wrongful Termination?

Illegal or wrongful termination is when you get fired or thrown out of your job even for no fault of yours i.e. without any sufficient cause or reason - maybe due to a personal conflict that you may have with your employer, or if your employer is downsizing, etc. Such instances of sudden termination can be a huge emotional and financial blow and thus it is imperative for an employee to be aware of the laws in India that govern such illegal or wrongful terminations. 


Illegal termination is one of the most commonly occurring employment disputes in India. Each year, many employees face wrongful termination and are left stranded with no financial support. If you are an employee or even an employer, you must read this article to understand the legal implications of and remedies available against illegal or wrongful termination. 


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


Ways in & Grounds upon which an Employee could be Terminated Wrongfully

An employee could be terminated on either fair grounds or unfair grounds. When an employee is terminated on fair or valid grounds, it is not illegal termination. These fair grounds may include misconduct, non-performance, dishonesty regarding qualifications or experience, theft of information, sexual harassment, wilful disobedience, damage to employer’s property, etc. Such grounds are usually mentioned in the contract between employee and employer. If dismissal is based on employee’s behaviour as per these grounds mentioned in the agreement, it is fair dismissal. 


However, there are many instances where the grounds of termination of an employee are either arbitrary or ambiguous. It could seem as though these grounds have been dragged under broader and generic grounds such as ‘non-performance’ or ‘misconduct’ by the employee. An employer is required to prove the grounds upon which the employee has been terminated- and if the employer fails to do so, he/she will have to compensate the employee for salary or wages for this time period. 


Consult: Top Labour & Service Lawyers in India



There are several forms of illegal termination. These could be covered under the following broad heads:

 


1. Discrimination

Firing on the baiss of race, age, gender, nationality, etc. is wrongful termination. For example it would be illegal termination if an employer fired his/her employee because the employee was suffering from HIV Aids. Firing an individual on the basis of discrimination is also a violation of an employee’s fundamental rights as protected by the Constitution of India. 

 


2. Violation of agreement/contract

The employer and the employee are required to abide by the terms of the employment contracts signed between them. If the employer breaches the terms of the contract and terminates the employee, it would amount to illegal termination. Even if such a scenario or situation is intentionally created so as to make the employee resign - it is a type of illegal termination.

 


3. Personal bias and other factors

The employer would be guilty of illegal termination if you as an employee is fired due to a dispute/personal grudge/refusal to act on illegitimate orders by the employer, etc. 


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


Laws against Illegal or Wrongful Termination

More often than not, employers make the employees sign agreements wherein the clauses are framed in a manner by which employees have to waive off their legal rights as well. However, several labour and employment laws in India protect employees against such atrocities. Several provisions of many statutes such as Industrial Disputes Act 1947, Women’s Compensation Act 1923, State Shops and Establishment Act, 1954 Constitution of India, Contract Act 1872, Maternity Benefits Act 1961, etc. have been enacted to protect employees. 

 


Legal Remedies and Recovery of Salary 

There are legal remedies that an employee can take recourse to, in case he/she has been illegally/unlawfully terminated. It is important to choose the correct legal remedy against your company/employer in order to get justice (and your salary). Given below are simple yet crucial steps that will help you if you have been terminated illegally. 

 


1. Grievance letter to the company/employer

This first step that you must take is to write a formal complaint or a grievance letter to the HR department of your Company or to your employer. Ensure that you include all important points that explain your issue in detail. You must give them time to understand and evaluate your matter and for the HR to resolve this dispute with your employer. If there is no reply or if the reply is not satisfactory, move on to the next step. 

 


2. Legal Notice

For this step, it is imperative that you hire a labour and service lawyer in order to send your legal notice. Legal notice is the first step of the legal recourse/court case. A legal notice must consist of the entire story in descriptive terms, signed by a lawyer. Through a legal notice, you must seek end to end damages including back pay, lost benefits, injunctive relief, punitive damages, health insurance provident fund and loss of salary. A specific time period for reply and for the company/employer to compensate you for your loss of job and your salary (including payment of interest for the delay) should be mentioned. It should also be stated that you would file a case in a Court if your legal notice is not complied with within the specified time period. 


The legal recourse starts by sending a legal notice to the company for the illegal termination and to recover any dues as per the terms of your employment with the company. In case of no reply to the legal notice, one may choose to file a suit for recovery of legitimate dues like unpaid salary, salary in lieu of notice period not allowed to serve, PF, gratuity and so on.


Consult: Top Labour & Service Lawyers in India

 


3. Suit

If there is no reply or an unsatisfactory reply by the employer/company, or if the case is that all your rightful demands are not met with within the time frame, you can file a suit in the Court of law with the help of a lawyer. Your lawyer will understand your case at hand and draft your lawsuit to be filed in the correct court. 


You could approach the Labour Commissioner in your region in order to present your matter. The company/employer would also be called upon to present their side. If your dispute has not been resolved within 45 days of moving to the Labour Commissioner’s office, you can also approach the Industrial Court of your region. You can approach the labour court if you fall into the category of ‘workmen’ as per the labour laws. If not, you can file a case in the civil courts for redressal. 


Many employers choose out of court settlements such as mediation since they are quicker and also help save the reputation of the company/employer. 


By initiating the correct and appropriate legal remedies, an employee who has been wronged can secure his/her job term and can also recover his/her due salary. The main relief an employee can get from the legal remedies is monetary compensation or damages. The purpose of monetary damages is to compensate you for what you lost because of the employer's actions. You will have to prove not only that you suffered losses because of the employer's wrongful actions, but also the amount of those losses.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


Documents required by Employee for Legal Notice and Lawsuit 

There are several documents that you must keep handy in order to be able to send a legal notice and/or to file a lawsuit. These are stated below:


Employment contract/agreement, 


Copy of bank statements as evidence to show non-payment of due salary 


Appointment letter 


Any other documents giving details of all additional benefits and perks


 


Why do you need a Lawyer? 

It is imperative that you hire a labour and service lawyer as he/she is aware of the laws and the procedures involved in case of wrongful or illegal termination. Only a lawyer will be able to guide you on the correct path as he/she has the requisite experience and expertise in dealing with such matters. A lawyer will be able to draft your legal notice and your suit and even file it in the correct court. A labour lawyer, being an expert in the service and labour laws can help you understand the options available to you in situations like these and can also assist you with the necessary procedures in order to resolve your issue regarding illegal termination and recovery of due salary.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more