Skip to main content

Administrative tribunals

  ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS 


These tribunals are the agencies that are created for the adjudication of controversies arising in the implementation of provisions of the enactments. The Court cannot solve all the problems in the short time, so there is some other ways to provide the solution for the parties. These are known as alternate dispute redressal system. These administrative tribunals are set up to provide judgements for the quasi-judicial problems. A tribunal is an adjudicating body which decides controversies between the parties and exercises judicial powers and thus possesses some of the trappings of a court but not all. These powers to these tribunals are derived from laws and statutes and not from the agreement of the parties. But it is not court in the strict sense. It has some judicial powers and perform some judicial and all quasi-judicial matters.  They are independent and no one can interrupt in their judicial and quasi-judicial functions, The tribunals can perform cases between both private parties and the Government. The writs of Certiorari and prohibition are available against decisions of the Administrative Tribunals. As we know it performs only the civil cases and no criminal nature cases can be solved by this. 

We can see some of the Tribunals that are performing their duties effectively. 

Railway Tribunals: 

This tribunal was established under Railways Act, 1890. It consists of the Chairman who worked as the Judge in Supreme court and two members who have knowledge about economic and commercial matters in India or worked in the Railway department. The term of office is not more than five years. The members were appointed by the Central Government. It has the characters of the Civil Court, The parties are heard as persons or through their lawyers and the decision of the Tribunal is the final. 



Industrial Tribunal: 

This was set up under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The tribunal consists of more than one person who are appointed by the Central or appropriate state government according to the cases. One of the members will be the Chairman of the Tribunal. It is a quasi-judicial body and not completely administrative body. The proceedings of this tribunal must be held in public and the award becomes the final on publication in the Government Gazette. All the members should sign the award otherwise it become illegal. 


Income Tax Tribunal

This tribunal was set up under The Income Tax Act, 1961. It consists of both judicial members and Accountant professionals. They are appointed by the Central government. One of the judicial members will be the chairman of the Tribunal. The Tribunal is under the control of Ministry of Law. It has benches in important cities like Ahmedabad, Allahabad, Mumbai, Calcutta, Chennai and Delhi. The tribunal has its own procedure and the order passed must be in writing and signed by the members of bench. It will be made known to the Commissioner of Income Tax. It acts like a judicial body and can call the witness. The appeal can be taken if there is any question of law and not for the question of facts. The Appeal can be taken to the High Court and then to the Supreme court. 

There are also some other tribunals like Copyright board, Claims Tribunal, Banking and Insurance Tribunal. According to Malimath Committee, the tribunal set up must retain basic judicial character to be considered as an alternative institutional mechanism in substitution of High court and other civil courts. 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree