Skip to main content

Arrest

 ARREST

INTRODUCTION

Arrest is the taking of a person into custody simply so he may be bound to reply for the commission of an offense. It is a real restraint of the character that is to be arrested, or through his submission to the custody of the person making the arrest.  It signifies restraint on person, depriving considered one of his own will and liberty, binding him to become obedient to the will of the law. Someone who, being suspected through a police officer of committing an offense, became invited by the way of the latter and who voluntarily went with him, changed into considered arrested, for arrest includes submission to the custody of the character making the arrest. The premise for his arrest being simply on suspicion, his arrest was legal.”
three.  The application of real force, manual touching of the body, physical restraint or formal declaration of arrest is not required.  Its far sufficient that there be a rationale on one of the parties, the arrest the opposite and a motive on the part of other to submit other than the notion and influence that submission is vital.
four. Made through a real or original restraint of the man or woman to be arrested, or through his submission to the custody of the person making the arrest.

Three categories of persons who can arrest: 

  • Police officer under sec 41, sec 41A and sec 42

  • By a private person under section 43

  • By the magistrate under section 44

REQUISITES FOR VALID SEARCH WARRANT AND WARRANT OF ARREST (SEC. 2.)

  •   It has to be issued upon probable purpose. 

  • The probable cause has to be determined personally by the honorable judge himself. 

  • The determination of the probable cause has to done by the judge after analyzing or examined by the judge of the complaint and the witness he might produce.

  •  The warrant needs to specially describe the location to be searched, and the men and women or matters to be seized.

  • Bench warrants don’t suddenly expire. 

  • They may be now not mechanically deleted after, for example, 5 years if the police fail to locate the subject of the warrant.

  • indeed, the warrant will stay outstanding till the subject dies, except the judge in any other case remembers or quashes it for a few different reasons. 

  • An extraordinary warrant is a valid arrest warrant that turned into at first issued months or years ago.

  •  it is nonetheless valid due to the fact the character has no longer been arrested but until it has been lifted.

  • FIRST: is upon filing of the statistics by using the prosecutor. In issuing this sort of warrant, the choose does no longer individually have a look at the complainant and the witnesses he might also produce, but he merely evaluates in my view the document and helping files and other proof adduced in the course of the initial research and submitted to him through the prosecutor, and if he reveals possibly reason on the basis thereof, he troubles the warrant for the arrest of the accused.

  • 2nd: is upon the application of the peace officer. In this sort of warrant, the choose have to in my view look at the applicant and the witnesses he can also produce, to discover climate there exists likely cause, otherwise the warrant issued is null and void.  He has to make sure about problem of the complainant and the witnesses to searching question. The looking questions, which a choose have to profound for the issuance of a warrant of arrest, are those, taking into consideration the purpose which have a tendency to expose fee of a crime and the perpetrator.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more