Skip to main content

Categories and Passage of the Bills - By Isha

 Categories and Passage of the Bills - By Isha


  1. Ordinary Bills

All the bills, other than Financial Bills, Money Bills, and the constitutional amendment bills are Ordinary Bills. Such bills can be introduced in either House of the Parliament without the recommendation of the President, except those bills under Article 3.


These bills are passed by a simple majority by both the Houses. Both the houses enjoy equal jurisdiction over such bills and in case of deadlock due to any reason, the tie is resolved by a joint sitting. The President has the right to return such Bills for reconsideration to the Parliament once.


Each house has laid down a procedure for the passing of a bill. According to the procedure of the House, a bill has to pass through three stages commonly known as Readings.

  • First Reading : The bill is introduced in the house. At this stage, no discussion takes place.

  • Second Reading: this is the consideration stage when the bill is discussed clause by clause.

  • Third Reading: During this stage, a brief general discussion of the bill takes place and the bill is finally passed.


  1. Money Bills

Money Bill is defined in Article 110 of the Constitution. As per the Article, and bill dealing with all or any of the matters enumerated from (a) to (g) of the same Article shall be a Money Bill. If there arises any question over the validity of the Money Bill, the decision of the speaker of the Lok Sabha is final. The speaker duly certifies the bill as Money Bill because this Bill passes through special procedures ( Article 109)

A money Bill can only originate in the Lok Sabha after the recommendations of the President.

After being passed by the Lok Sabha, the Money Bill passes on to the Rajya Sabha which has four options:

  1.   Pass the bill in the original form

  2. Reject the bill

  3. Take no action for 14 days

  4. Send the bill with suggestive amendments to the Lok Sabha.

If the case is either (b) or (c), the bill shall be automatically deemed to have been passed by the Rajya Sabha. In case of (d), the Lok Sabha has sole authority to accept or reject one or all of the recommendations and in this case also the bill shall be deemed as passed with or without recommendations.

There is no provision for a joint sitting of the Parliament to pass a Money Bill.

After the Money Bill is passed by the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, it is presented to the President who unlike in the case of other Bills, has no right to withhold it. (Article 111)


  1. Financial Bills

Any bill dealing with revenue or expenditure, but not certified as a money Bill by the speaker, it is a Financial Bill. These Financial Bills are of two classes: 

  1. A bill  containing any of the matters specified in Article 110, but not exclusively dealing with those matters. This is called the Financial Bills of first class. 

  2. An ordinary bill contains provisions involving expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India. This is called the Financial Bill of Second Class.

As regards the procedure for its passage, a Financial Bill is as good as Ordinary Bill except that a Financial Bill cannot be introduced without the President’s recommendations, and it can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha. Thus a financial Bill is passed according to the ordinary procedure provided for passing of an ordinary bill.


  1. Constitutional Amendments Bills

Article 368 deals with the power of the Parliament to amend the constitution, and the procedure thereof. A bill for this can be introduced in either House ( the Lok Sabha of the Rajya Sabha) of the Parliament and there is no need of the President’s recommendation for this.

Such a bill must be passed by each house separately with a special majority required under Article 368 i.e., not less than two-third of the members of the house present and voting.

This majority should be more than the absolute majority of the house. The joint sitting of parliament is not possible for passing such a bill ( Article 108). If the bill is passed by both the houses, it goes for the President’s assent. By the 24th Constitutional Amendment Act, it is obligatory for the President to give his assent to the bill amending the Constitution.

But the Amending power of the Parliament is subject to the ' Basic Structure of the Constitution'. Thus the amending power is limited. The Supreme Court can strike down any such amendment, if it is not in concurrence with the basic structure of the Constitution.




           






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree