Skip to main content

Euthanasia

 EUTHANASIA

The phenomenal advances in scientific technology and generation have no longer been without an extensive effect on society. they have delivered into leading edge troubles that are changing the pattern of human dwelling and societal values. Pari passu with these modifications is the upsurge of confirmation of human rights, autonomy, and freedom of desire. those troubles compel us to re-evaluate our principles of societal and clinical ethics and cost structures.

amongst these problems, the palliative care and best of life problems in sufferers with terminal illnesses like advanced most cancers and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) have become an essential region of medical care and investigation. widespread progress has been made in extending a palliative care/great of lifestyles studies agenda to the medical issues of sufferers with most cancers, together with efforts that focus on intellectual health related troubles along with neuropsychiatric syndromes and psychological symptoms in sufferers with terminal medical contamination. but, perhaps the maximum compelling and clinically relevant mental fitness troubles in palliative care these days challenge the choice for death and health practitioner-assisted suicide (PAS) and their dating to despair

n India, euthanasia is a crime. phase 309 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) offers with the attempt to commit suicide and section 306 of the IPC offers with abetment of suicide – each move is punishable. only folks who are brain useless may be taken off life support with the help of family contributors. Likewise, the Honorable ideally suited court is likewise of the view that that the right to existence assured by means of Article 21 of the constitution does no longer include the right to die. The courtroom held that Article 21 is a provision ensuring safety of life and private liberty and via no stretch of creativeness can extinction of existence be study into it. but, numerous pro-euthanasia organizations, the maximum distinguished amongst them being the death with Dignity basis, hold on combating for legalization of a character's proper to pick out his own death

medical technological know-how is progressing in India as inside the relaxation of the arena, and hence currently we are having devises that can extend life through artificial manner. this could circuitously lengthen terminal suffering and may also show to be very high priced for the households of the difficulty in query. hence, cease-of-life issues are becoming important ethical concerns in the cutting-edge-day scientific science in India. The proponents and the combatants of euthanasia and PAS are as active in India as inside the relaxation of the arena. however, the Indian legislature does no longer appear to be touchy to these. The landmark excellent courtroom judgment has provided a primary raise to pro-euthanasia activists even though it's miles an extended manner to go before it turns into a law within the parliament. moreover, concerns for its misuse stay a first-rate trouble which ought to be addressed before it will become a regulation in our united states.

India is a country, which gives much importance to its culture and tradition, and Indians follow their traditions, be it cultural or religious, very piously. Since euthanasia is not recognized in most of the religions followed here, considering that life and death is in the hands of God, and humans cannot interfere in it; introducing a provision which would hurt the religious sentiments of the majority of religions, clearly may not be a very appealing idea.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree