Skip to main content

Homsexuality

 HOMOSEXUALITY

Homosexuals are ordinary people attracted to their very own gender. Homosexuality (rarely Hemophilia) is a sexual orientation or orientations characterized by using romantic or sexual choice for, or sexual appeal in the direction of member of the equal sex. The time period usually implies an one-of-a-kind or predominant sexual orientation toward individuals of the same sex and is outstanding from bisexuality in addition to heterosexuality. similarly, to relating to a sexual orientation, the term homosexuality is likewise used for sexual conduct between humans of the identical sex.

In women, romantic or sexual desire for other ladies is likewise called 'lesbianism'. The time period 'homosexual' is used to consult gay men and women of both genders, even though it is frequently used to refer to adult males. men and women with the sexual orientation of homosexuality are occasionally called homosexuals. Many people regard the time period 'homosexual' as derogatory or clinical due to its cold, antiseptic connotation, specifically while applied to a person, and the majority who regard themselves as having a homosexual orientation prefer the term gay, lesbian, or, much less often, queer or identical-gender loving.

Like heterosexuality, homosexuality is an orientation, which isn't always unnatural. Society is converting and accepts this orientation - what is not changing is the legal mind-set in India. Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, changed into enacted by using the British in 1860. ironically, while the British drafted this segment even as changing a tolerant Indian attitude towards sexuality with an oppressive one, this regulation was repealed in United Kingdom in 1967. this segment criminalizes what it calls, 'sexual offences in opposition to the order of nature'. It does not in any region outline what constitutes the order of nature, but the judicial pronouncements which have come during the last one and half of century has prolonged the utility of this segment to all varieties of sexual expressions this is feasible among male persons. on every occasion the regulation or the government have come upon instances of lesbianism, there was a thus far unsuccessful attempt to follow this regulation to them as nicely. Homosexuality in India stands criminalized due to a mid-nineteenth century colonial regulation.

Gays. Lesbians. Bisexuals. Tans-gender individuals. No proper to marry, adopt kids or even protest against discrimination on the work vicinity in reality, no proper to be recognized as normal people lose to live life as billions of other dos. All because of sexual orientation. that is an anxious scepter indeed for a country where extra than 10% of the population is comprised with the aid of GLBT's. must we retain to permit this inhuman truth? that is the question.

I stop with a quote carried in an editorial printed inside the Asian Age Dated three October 2003: There are numerous sections inside the Indian Penal Code which are anachronistic in a changed world. segment 377 is a high example. As a count of truth, segment 377 as it stands, could have made what Clinton did to Monica Lewinsky or alternatively what Monica Lewinsky provided to Clinton, an offence. i am being discreet, due to the fact after all, some things can best be dealt with orally and cannot be positioned down on paper! The critical phrases are "towards the order of nature." The opportunities are great and the creativeness can nicely run rise up. possibly the manner out is now to argue that nature and its diverse orders have themselves modified
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more