Skip to main content

Analysis of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967- By Isha

 Analysis of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) – By Isha


Introduction

Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 is the cornerstone of India’s legislative policy against terrorism. UAPA was enacted with an object to control unlawful activities. It embodies the essence of the Preventive Detection Act which expired in 1969. Over the years the act has gone through several amendments to widen the ambit of its application.


Background of the UAPA

The UAPA was passed in the year 1967. The origin of the act lies in the recommendation of the committee formed by National Integration Council, to look into the issue of ‘National integration and regionalization’.

Based on the recommendations and findings of this committee, the 16th Amendment Act of 1963 was passed that introduced reasonable restrictions on certain fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution namely:

  • Freedom of speech and expression.

  • Right to assemble peacefully.

  • Right to form associations and unions.

In order to implement these restrictions, UAPA was introduced and enacted in the year 1967.

UAPA is an anti terror legislation whose enforcement body is National Investigation Agency (NIA) which is India’s Central counter terrorism agency.

UAPA mainly deals with unlawful activities. The scope of unlawful activities includes: those actions of the individual and organisations which intent to bring cession and disrupt or question the sovereignty and territorial integrity of India.


Since the act has gone through several amendments, increasing the scope of its liability. One such amendment was made in the year 2004, in which the Parliament introduced some dedicated chapters in the act by including punishment for ‘Terrorist Activities’ which was defined in Section 15 under Chapter IV of the act. Interestingly, 2004 was also the  year in which the infamous Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) was repealed. Therefore, prompting many to term the amendment as an attempt to keep the spirit of POTA alive.


Amendment of 2019

  1. Initially, only organisations could be banned or prosecuted for a terrorist act. But after the amendment of 2019, this act would also be applicable on individuals who are involved in the terror related activities. This change in designation of a terrorist can be witnessed in Section 35 & 36 of Chapter VI of the UAPA act.

Under the recent amendment the Government has been given powers to designate an organization as terrorist organisation if;

  • It commits or participates in acts of terrorism.

  • Prepares or promotes terrorism.

  • Otherwise involved in terrorism.


  1. The second and the horrific aspect of this amendment, which makes it even more dreadful is that a person booked under the act can be detained for 6 months (or 180 days) without even filing a charge sheet. In contrast to this, under ordinary criminal law this period is only to 3 months or (90 days) after which the detained person gets a right to bail.


  1. The third aspect of the amendment is that it added 4th Schedule in the UAPA act which empowered the government to brand an individual as a terrorist. Although, the individual has the right to file an objection within 45 days with the Home ministry against such declaration. Also, a review committee will be setup with a retired/sitting judge as its head along with 3 other members and the aggrieved party can file for review to the committee.


Conclusion

This amendment has been several opposed by the opposition and civil society activists. Criticising this amendment, they have raised an objection that this amendment can be highly misused as it gives immense powers to the Government to monitor or curb any type of dissent.

The validity of this amendment has been challenged in a PIL, Sajal Awasthi v. Union of India and the same is pending in the apex court. This PIL mainly seek to struck down and declare Sec 35 and 36 as unconstitutional.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more