Skip to main content

Capital Punishment for rape

 Capital punishment for rape

The rarest of the rare principles represented by the Supreme Court of India in the case of Bachan Singh vs. State of Punjab in imposing capital penalty appears to have been used exclusively where the defendant is a low-income individual from a social class where illiteracy has only brought suffering. The fact that they are unable to fight their case because they are unable to engage a lawyer who has masterminded the provisions of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution to save his client is the reason for the Court's decision.

We cannot do injustice to so many people in order to do justice to one individual. Why should the rapist's innocent family suffer for an act for which he, the perpetrator, is solely responsible? Would capital punishment truly deliver justice?

The perpetrators of the horrible act have discovered an easier way to get away with the crime thanks to the concept of capital punishment. To murder the victim, toss her aside, and then flee, hoping that the crime would never be traced back to the perpetrator.

The most important point to examine here is whether the circumstances of the crime are such that there is no other option except to condemn someone to death.

The Hindu dharma speaks of nark for evildoers, the Muslim of jhanum, and Christianity of hell for evildoers, but all religions, without exception, speak of reformation. Allowing the perpetrator to recompense the victim would go a long way toward rehabilitating the individual. Furthermore, social resistance against such activities might be beneficial in the long term.

The terrible issue is that even the law's definition of rape is incredibly narrow and restrictive. The terrible issue is that even the law's definition of rape is incredibly narrow and restrictive. Sexual intercourse is defined as rape under Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, where penetration alone is sufficient to create the sexual intercourse that constitutes rape. The fact that rape is a far broader phrase and should be given a lot broader interpretation has received little attention. Though a broader interpretation may be challenging, if we wish to entirely eliminate the problem of outraging a woman's modesty, a solution must be discovered.

The plaintiff will have an easier time proving her case thanks to the definition. The notion carries a massive degree of social shame in the given society. Even if rape is not committed in the technical meaning of Section 375 of the IPC, the victim suffers an equivalent amount of injury if the victim believes he or she has been raped. If we follow the stringent meaning of Section 375 of the IPC, it may not always be feasible to show beyond a reasonable doubt that a rape has occurred.


According to an empirical research, persons who were sentenced to death in India were either impoverished or from a minority group, or both. Nonetheless, we are not attempting to take sides; rather, we are attempting to state that if justice is to be served, it must be both fair and reasonable. Justice should be applied equally to everybody.

It requires a comprehensive reassessment as a sociological and legal matter. Also, if torture is judged to be the best course of action for the rapist, why can't this pain be constructive? For example, the guilty might be forced to pay the victim or her family with his earnings or community service. Rape is one of the most horrific crimes against humanity, hence the penalty should be severe. As a result, others are afraid of the crime.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree