Skip to main content

Maintenance laws for women in India

 The applicant may be granted maintenance in monetary terms or residency rights as per the statute invoked by her. After approaching the court and invoking relevant sections of law and demonstrating the facts of the case according to the statement of the law, the court can grant just and fair maintenance to the applicant.


When Can Maintenance Provisions Be Invoked?


Whenever a law governing maintenance is breached, a petition can be filed with a court of competent jurisdiction, and the petition will be decided on the merits of the case. For example, under section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, if a husband refuses to maintain his wife, the wife may approach the Hon'ble Court for maintenance. In a Domestic Violence case, prima facie evidence of Domestic Violence is required to obtain maintenance for the wife. All cases are handled on their own merits within the parameters of the law, and the courts are fairly generous when it comes to giving maintenance.


Quantum of Maintenance:


The law that governs maintenance has been evolved by the Supreme Court. The 25% of the husband's wages are considered fair, appropriate, and reasonable by the courts in normal circumstances. However, it varies from case to case, depending on the circumstances in which the petitioner and respondent live and the status of the respondent.


Who Can Claim Maintenance Under Various Laws?


After the debates of the constituent assembly discussions and the coming into force of the Constitution of India, the jurisprudence of maintenance arose from the idea of Social Justice in India, which ensures India's commitment to Social Justice.








Here are a few examples:


Wife, children, and parents (Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code);

Senior Citizens Act; Parents; Senior Citizens Act;

Women (Domestic Violence Act);


Wife and kids (Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act).


How Can Maintenance Claimed?

Filing of the Petition

Reply;

Interim relief (if any);

Petitioner?s evidence

Respondent?s evidence;

Arguments;

Judgment;

Execution.


Importance of Mediation:


Although maintenance is still a legal process, we recognize that many people are visiting the court for the first time, and our goal must be to make the process simple for the litigants. We shall make every attempt to resolve maintenance matters amicably, even if the path of mediation is tough because marriage disagreements are human concerns, the best approach for addressing them is through mediation. We are certain that these disagreements can be professionally handled in chambers through the use of mediation. In its purest form, Mahatama Gandhi called it the VAKALAT.


Consult the Qualified Advocates for Legal Advice:


It is vital to acquire adequate legal assistance before initiating any legal action in matrimonial disputes. Early legal representation, according to the top matrimonial lawyers, has a long-term impact on matrimonial litigation outcomes. Expert lawyers conduct an in-depth examination of case-related documents, solicit input from clients, and engage in detailed discussions about various aspects of the matrimonial case when preparing a legal opinion in matrimonial cases.


All of these factors are combined and weighed against the most recent Supreme Court and High Court judgments when preparing a legal opinion in matrimonial cases. Clients typically do not pursue proper legal remedies, instead of seeking remedies that should not have been sought in the first place, according to the experience advocates. This approach clogs the justice delivery system by overloading Family Courts and Trial Courts.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree