Skip to main content

COPYRIGHT/S

 COPYRIGHT/S  Copyright is an exclusive right granted by the government to the artists, authors for their original literary and artistic works. Literary works include poems, songs, dramatic works, dialogues, musical notes (even ringtones), etc.  Artistic works include etching, blueprints, photographs, movies, videos with audio content, sound recordings ( example : sounds from the nature - waves, birds, etc.)  In India computer programmes can be copyrighted. They can also be patented in specific circumstances.  Whenever somebody refers to somebody else’s work in news etc., they have to show that they have referred to the same (courtesy) and that it was important to refer to the same. This is not the case for commercial purposes.   Duration/Term of Copyright In the case of original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works, the duration of copyright is the lifetime of the author or artist, and 60 years counted from the year following the death of the author.  In the case of cinematograph films, sound recordings, photographs, posthumous publications, anonymous and pseudonymous publications, works of government and works of international organisations, they are protected for a period of 60 years which is counted from the year following the date of publication.  Most legislations allow the renewal of copyrights after the said/ pre- determined period. If the copyright is not renewed after the said period, the artistic works are then considered to be in the public domain. Once the works are in public domain they can be used by the other artists to refurbish them or to create new artworks with their own additions. In such cases, the original artist will still hold the moral rights to the artwork while the artist who used the artwork will have copyright over the additions he/she/ they made to the artwork.  There is no need to register copyrights. Once the work is created it is assumed to be protected by the copyright laws.  In case of budget/ investment intensive projects like movies it is recommended to register copyrights as it has evidential value  in the court in case of infringement to prove that it is an original work of the plaintiff as an original creator.  Ideas or thoughts in the mind cannot be copyrighted. They can be copyrighted only when they are fixated - expressed in material forms - written, recorded.  Special choreography (dance moves/ step wise dance and aerobic performances ) can be protected under the copyright laws if they are unique and substantial.  Sports moves cannot be copyrighted due to being a de minimis exception.  The de minimis exception : The de minimis exception gets its name after the legal maxim “de minimis non-curat lex”. It means “the law does not concern itself with trifles.” Furthermore. the maxim states that the law will not resolve the small or trivial disputes.  Types of Copyright infringement : A. Primary : Primary infringement refers to the real act of copying the work of the copyright holder. For example, photocopying a book and then distributing it for commercial purposes.  1.Substantial Taking A copyright is infringed only when an unauthorized person copies a substantial part of the work. For example, copying a catchy phrase of a lyricist.  Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Vs Hamar Television Network Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.  2011 PTC (45) PTC 70 (Del.)- explained the term ' substantial taking' in detail. Generally the questions of nature and level of infringement are in the discretion of the judge and subsequently on the way the arguments are presented. 2.Casual Connection The copyright holder must prove that there is a similarity in the works of the copyright holder and the infringer. However, this may be because of several other reasons like both of them have used the same source for the research. In such a case, the copyright holder can not claim for infringement.  B. Secondary Secondary Infringement refers to the infringement of copyright work without actually copying it. This can happen in the following ways: 1.Providing a place for Copyright Infringement 2.Selling Infringing Copies 3.Distributing Infringing Copies 4.Distributing Infringing Copies 5.Importing Infringing Copies

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree