Skip to main content

pleminary enquiry before registering FIR

                               SHORT NOTE ON LEGAL OPINION

FACTS:

Jyoti is in matrimonial disharmony. She has lodged the complaint against her husband & in laws for cruelty under section 498A, which is a cognizable offence. But the police did not register the F.I.R..

ISSUE:

Can police withhold F.I.R. for the preliminary enquiry.

LEGAL ASPECT:

Inquiry means every enquiry other than trial conducted under the Code of Criminal Procedure by a magistrate or Judge under Section 2 (1) (g) of Code of Criminal Procedure. The provision of inquiry by magistrate into cause of death, where:

  1. Any person dies or disappear

  2. Rape is alleged to have been committed on any women

In the case of Manubhai Ratilal Patel V. State of Gujrat & others (2013) Supreme Court held that investigation by police is neither any inquiry not trial. The provision for investigation preliminary inquiry mentioned under section 157 of Code of Criminal Procedure, from the information received by the police In Charge of Police station to a report of the same to a magistrate empowered to take the cognizance of such offence. if the case is not serious in nature, police need not to proceed to make investigation. The power of magistrate to hold investigation on receiving report of cognizable offence may direct investigation under section 159 of Code of Criminal Procedure. Section 200 of Code of Criminal Procedure stated the provision for the examination of complaint file in the court instead of Police station. The court has the power to conduct inquiry into any offence in relation to the proceeding in that court or in respect of a document or evidence produced in the court under section 340 of Code of Criminal procedure. 

WITH REFERENCE TO INDIAN CONSTITUTION:

There are some Article that explain about the supremacy of the central law making body Parliament and virtue of Law declared by the Supreme Court of India. The law made by Parliament shall be prevailed over law made by the state legislature under Article 254 (1) of the Constitution. Under Article 141 of the constitution law declared by the Supreme Court to be binding on all the Courts within the territory of India.

JUDGEMENTS:

In the case of Abhijit Pawar V. Hemant Madhukar Nimbalkar & another (2017) & Pepsi Food Ltd. & another V. Special Judicial Magistrate & others (1998) Supreme Court held that holding enquiry is Mandatory further reflect application of  mind in case of filing complaint in the Court. 

PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY:

The concept of Preliminary enquiry comes from the ruling of the Supreme Court. In the case of Lalita Kumari V. State of U.P. (2013) a bench of 5 judges in the Supreme Court held that registration of F.I.R. is mandatory and no preliminary enquiry is permissible in the case of Cognizable offences. Preliminary enquiry may be allowed to be conduct which will depend upon the facts of the cases.

There is no hard & fast rule to determine which case undergoes Preliminary enquiry but there are some cases where preliminary enquiry is mandatory. In  the case of Matrimonial disputes or Family disputes referring to Preeti Gupta & Another V. State of Jharkhand (2010) where Supreme Court remark that there are number of cases which has been filed with mala fide intention & with oblique motive. Law commission of India Report No. 243 stated that there are multiple time people misusing section 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 with alter motive and personal advantage. In order to protect the innocent preliminary enquiry shall be conduct by the Police. Court decide whether F.I.R. is mandatory or Preliminary enquiry shall be conducted. Preliminary enquiry shall be done on the discretion of police. F.I.R. in the cases of commercial offences referring to V.Y. Jose V. State of Gujarat (2008) Supreme Court held that Disputes related to civil offences should not be allowed to be the subject matter of Criminal offences. In cases of Ramdev Food Products Pvt. Ltd. V. State of Gujarat (2015) Supreme Court held that commercial offences has been put in the category of cases where F.I.R. may not be warranted without enquiry. In the case of Medical Negligence referring to Jacob Mathew V. State of Punjab (2005) Supreme Court held that there is a need for the protecting Doctors from frivolous or unjust prosecutions. The investigation officer should conduct enquiry before proceeding & executive guidelines needed to be framed in consultation with Medical Council of India. In the cases of corruption referring to Shashikant V. CBI (2006) Supreme Court held that preliminary enquiry shall be conducted before proceeding by the CBI manual. F.I.R. in the cases of Delay reporting referring to State of A.P. V. M. Madhusudhan Rao (2008) Supreme Court held that it is essential that the delay in lodging the report should be satisfactory explanation. 

Recently in the case of State of Telangana V. Mangipet @ Mangipet Sarveshwar Reddy (2019) Supreme Court held that there is no set format in which a preliminary enquiry is to be conducted. The intention of the enquiry is not to initiate frivolous. The Court does not state that proceedings cannot be initiated against an accused without conducting a preliminary enquiry. 

The legislation allow preliminary enquiry to be completed within 7 days, if not reason for delay shall be mentioned in the report book. After the enquiry if police think that the offence in not a cognizable offence and they are not able to register F.I.R., police need to inform the complainant about such situation within 7 days. 

CONCLUSION: 

In provision of law there is no section that authorize police to conduct preliminary enquiry. In addition to the fact Supreme Court ruling say preliminary enquiry is not a rule but an exception. 

OPINION:

As Jyoti Approch Police for registering F.I.R. against her husband & his family. Jyoti file complaint under section 498A of Indian Penal Code which is a cognizable & non Bailable offence. As far as case concern it is a criminal matter & matrimonial issue has been involved. Preliminary enquiry shall be conducted before proceeding and police should take immediate action. Registration of F.I.R. is mandatory in the cases of Cognizable offences and court will decide whether preliminary enquiry is needed or prima facie has been establish to begin proceeding.

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

INCOME TAX SECTION 32AD - Investment in new plant or machinery in notified backward areas in certain States

 Description (1) Where an assessee, sets up an undertaking or enterprise for manufacture or production of any article or thing, on or after the 1st day of April, 2015 in any backward area notified by the Central Government in this behalf, in the State of Andhra Pradesh or in the State of Bihar or in the State of Telangana or in the State of West Bengal, and acquires and installs any new asset for the purposes of the said undertaking or enterprise during the period beginning on the 1st day of April, 2015 and ending before the 1st day of April, 2020 in the said backward area, then, there shall be allowed a deduction of a sum equal to fifteen per cent of the actual cost of such new asset for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such new asset is installed. (2) If any new asset acquired and installed by the assessee is sold or otherwise transferred, except in connection with the amalgamation or demerger or re-organisation of business referred to in clause (xiii)or cla

60 Minute Marriage Counselling Session On Phone

Description A 60 minute phone call with an expert Marriage\Relationship Counselor to discuss your marriage\relationship related issues. Counselling aims to resolve issues and improve communication in a relationship. Couples’ counselling works with both people in the relationship, however sessions can start with one individual, working towards the involvement of the other partner. What's Included a) 60 minute phone call with the counselor where you can discuss all your issues and seek guidance. What's Not Included a) Counselling session via meeting

Send Legal Notice for Divorce

 India being a secular country derives a large part of its laws from various religious practices. One such area of law is Divorce law of India. A divorce case in India can be initiated by either party based on the procedure relevant as per the law applicable to the parties. However, the procedure for divorce always starts with sending a legal notice.   Either party can send a legal notice to the other spouse intimating his/her intent to initiate legal proceedings for divorce. Sending a legal notice acts as a formal way of communication by one party to the other acting as a warning and at the same time creating chances for a last attempt for conciliation, if possible. Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue   What is a legal notice for divorce? A legal notice refers to a formal communication to a person or the opposite party in a case, informing him/her about one’s intention to undertake legal proceedings against him/her. Therefore, a legal notice for divorce is a formal inti