Skip to main content

Directors of Company

 Who Are Directors?

Directors are the persons appointed to direct and supervise the affairs of a company. The company’s business is consigned in the hands of directors. Team of directors of the company is collectively known as its Board of Directors, which wields the supreme executive authority controlling the management and affairs of a company. In practice it is the Board of Directors which looks after the management and protects the interests of all the stakeholders of the Company


Basically, Board of Directors is a group of trustworthy and respectable people who looks after the interests of the large number of shareholders who are not directly involved in the management of the company. They are entrusted with the responsibility to act in the best interests of the company. The Companies Act, 2013 does not contain an detailed definition of the term director”. Section 2 (34) of the Act says that director” means a director appointed to the Board of a company. A director is a person appointed to perform the duties and functions of director of a company in conformity with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. Directors are at times described as trustees, agents and sometimes as managing partners. Directors are viewed differently according to circumstances.


According to the provisions of Companies Act, 2013 it is mandatory for every company to have minimum 3 directors in case of public limited companies, at least 2 directors in case of private limited companies and 1 director in case of one-person companies. Maximum a company can have 15 directors. In Case the company wishes to appoint more directors, it can do so by passing the special resolution in its general meeting (GM).

Types of Directors:

Residential Director

According to provisions of law, every company needs to appoint a director who has been in India and stayed for at least 182 days in a previous calendar year.


Independent Director

They are non-executive directors of a company and contribute the company by improving corporate credibility and enhancing the governance standards. That is to say, an independent director is a non-executive director without a relationship with a company which can impact the independence of his judgment.


The term of the independent directors is up to 5 consecutive years; however, they are entitled to reappointment by passing a special resolution with the disclosure in the Board’s report. Below mentioned are the companies that need to appoint minimum two independent directors:


Public Companies having Paid-up Public Companies having total outstanding loans, deposits, and debenture of Rs.50 Crores or more.Public Companies having total outstanding loans, deposits, and debenture of Rs.50 Crores or more.


Small Shareholders Directors

A listed company, can after the notice of at least 1000 small shareholders or 10% of the total number of the small shareholder, whichever is lower, shall have a director which would be elected by small shareholders.


Women Director

As per Section 149 (1) (b) second proviso of the Companies act, it is mandatory for a company, be it a private company or a public company, to appoint at least one woman director in case it satisfies any of the following criteria:


The company is a listed company & its securities are listed on the stock exchange.


The paid-up capital of such company is up to Rs.100 crore or more with a turnover of Rs.300 crores or more.


Additional Director

A person could be appointed as an add. Director and can occupy his post until next AGM (Annual General Meeting). In absence of the AGM, such a term would conclude on the date on which such AGM should have been held.


Alternate Director

Alternate director refers to a person appointed by the Board, in order to fill in for a director who might be absent from the country, for the period of more than 3 months.


Nominee Directors

Nominee directors can be appointed by a specified category of shareholders, banks or lending financial institutions, third parties through contracts, or by Central Government in case of oppression or mismanagement.


Appointment of Directors:

According to the provisions of Companies Act 2013, only an individual can be appointed as a member of the board of directors. Usually, the appointment of directors is made by shareholders. A company, a legal firm and an association, with an artificial legal personality can’t be appointed as a director. It must to be a real person.


In a company which is public or a private, a total of two-thirds of directors are appointed by the shareholders. The remaining one-third members are appointed with regard to prescribed guidelines in the Article of Association. In case the company is a private company, their Article of Association can authorise the method to appoint any and all of the directors. In case the Articles are silent, the directors have to be mandatorily be appointed by the shareholders. The Companies Act also have a provision that permits a company to appoint two-thirds of the company directors to be appointed through the principle of proportional representation. This happens if the company has accepted this policy.


Nominee directors shall be appointed by third party authorities or the Government to tackle misconduct and mismanagement. It is the primary duty of directors to act honestly, exercise reasonable care and skill while they perform their assigned duties on behalf of the organization.


Appointment of Managing Directors

A Managing director (MD) must be an individual i.e. a real person and s/he can be appointed for a maximum period of five years. A Managing director of a pre-existing company can be appointed as a managing director of another company as long as the board of directors of the first company approve and are aware of this new appointment.


Conditions for Appointing Directors

The Companies Act does not prescribe any qualifications for Directors of any company. An Indian company may, therefore, in its Articles, stipulate qualifications for Directors. However there are certain condition which needs to be fulfilled to appoint directors.


The following conditions needs to be fulfilled while appointing a director:

S/he should not have been sentenced to imprisonment for any period, or a fine imposed under various laws and statutes.

They must not have been detained or convicted for any duration under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974.

S/he must have completed 25 years of age, but should be less than 70 years of age. However, this age limit is not applicable if the appointment is approved by a special resolution passed by the company in GM or the approval of the Union government is obtained.

They should be a managerial person in one or more companies and draws Consideration from one or more companies subject to the limitations specified in Section III of Part II of Schedule XIII.

S/he should be Indian Resident. It means a person who has been staying in India for a continuous period of not less than 12 months immediately preceding the date of his/her appointment as a managerial person and who has come to stay in India for taking up employment in India or for carrying on business or occupation in India.

Powers Of Directors

Corporate body incorporated is artificial person, so it is necessarily needed to be represented by living person. So, the functioning and the business of any company is entrusted in the hands of directors. Office of director is that office of the company who handle all the affairs and daily business of the company.


In the case of Bath vs standard land company limited Neville J held that board of directors are the brain of the company and company acts only in their directions. Though director is such a salient position it is endowed with various powers to handle the business of the company.

A board of directors is the biggest authority of the company and is vested with the various powers under section 179 of the companies act 2013. Directors can make any and all of the decisions and can exercise the power of which the company has authority or is entitled. Directors appointed have all the control over the operations of the company.


All the powers are not absolute, directors can exercise their power independently but are subject to memorandum and articles and also board of director are not competent to do the act which are required to be done by the shareholders in general meetings.


Resignation Of Director

Resignation could be done by director of the company under section 168 (1) of the companies act 2013. A director has the option to resign from his office by giving notice in writing to the company and board shall on receipt of such notice take note of the same and company shall intimate this to registrar in the manner as prescribed. In the immediately following general meeting by the company, it should be laid down in the reports of director


Within 30 days from the day of resignation. Director shall also forward copy of resignation along with detailed reason of resignation to the registrar of the company. There is no right provided under companies act 2013 to any managerial person to reject the resignation of the director. But if any offence has been committed by director, then he shall be liable even after the resignation.


As per section 168 (2) of companies act 2013 the resignation of director shall take effect from the date on which the ‘notices received’ by the company or ‘the date if any specified’ by director in the notice whichever is later.


Removal Of Director

When we talk about directors of the company, they constituted very important position in the company. Directors are also called brain of the company as they are completely responsible for operating a business of company. But many times, situations come where management has to Suo Moto remove person from the post of director. For example, due to negligence, breach of privacy or any other condition etc. It is section 169 of the companies act 2013 which deals with the removal of directors.

Directors appointed by tribunal cannot be removed from the post of directorship and where the company has availed itself of option to, appoint not less than two third of the total number of directors according to principle of proportional representation as per provision of companies act 2013 then also no removal from post of directorship could be there


Removal by Company Law Board/National Company Law Tribunal

Any of the director of the company is found guilty of misconduct like oppression, harassment, fraud etc then he could be removed by the National company law tribunal or company law board. There is provision that if the director is removed by National company law tribunal then he cannot resume the position of director in any company for the period of next five years


Procedure for Removal of Directors

Firstly, concerned director should be intimated about his removal, board meeting should be done and resolution for removal of director should be passed. Notice of the meeting should be sent before 14 days of the general meeting. In meeting director should be allowed to speak and he should be listened, if it’s just and equitable then only the resolution to remove director should be passed. If resolution gets passed then the documents for such removal should be prepared and the concerned department should be intimated if the director is independent director, then the consent of two third members of the meeting is necessary.


Conclusion

Directors of company play indispensable role in the functions of company. There are many types of directors which are appointed by the company and each has it’s different functioning. They play vital role in smooth operation of company and that’s the reason they are vested with many powers, at the same time there are certain restrictions to avoid misuse of powers.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree