Skip to main content

IMPACT OF RTI ON VARIOUS INSTITUTIONS

 IMPACT OF RTI ON VARIOUS INSTITUTIONS 


India is one of the largest democracy in the world, but it still has not been able to gain trust of its citizens, it can be only achieved when people have access to all the data and are able to use that information efficiently. Information is one of those things that one cannot do without. It guides us and helps us to make up our choices. India is a democratic country where we have had the freedom of expression and opinion for a very long time. India is one place with full of diversity where every opinion matters. To form these opinions, a citizen must have an ample amount of information with correct and credible facts. People being the most important pillar in a democracy should be aware of the workings of the administration to see if they are not being deceived and the policies and decisions are being implemented in the intended manner. 


Keeping in mind all these key points, RTI, one of the most revolutionary acts introduced in India, empowers people to seek information from any public authority which creates a two way communication channel between the government and its citizens. After the introduction of RTI in 2005, there has been increase in transparency, accountability and responsibility which leads to good governance. India being cursed with poverty, problems regarding shelter, food and employment ; RTI is the need of the hour to stop corruption from hindering the development of our country. In the recent times, RTI has come out to be an effective method to curb the evil of corruption and protect the fundamental rights of people. 


Some of the institutions which have been highly influenced by this act are: 

  • RESERVE BANK OF INDIA : RBI has been covering our Indian banks shortcomings since time immemorial but the problem gets serious when the publicʼs money and interests are at stake where RBI should disclose the relevant details as to save the public from misguided decisions. One of the major game changing case in regards to this is Bank Of India vs. Jayantilal Mistri. 


  • FOOD DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : PDS is one of the most prominent schemes which has been proved very beneficial for the impoverished section of the society. But one of the major shortcomings of this system is that it is plagued with corruption. Due to this, the system is not only moving away from of its goal of equity but is also tarnishing the ideology behind it. There have been cases where shopkeepers have defaulted and indulged in unfair practices. RTI has compelled these shopkeepers to maintain proper records which has helped in fighting with systematic corruption and also help the poor at the same time. 


  • NON-PROFIT ORGANISATIONS : There have been cases where NGOs have been siphoning off the funds for illegal practices. After RTI, people have become more aware and are able to raise queries against something which they find dubious. This has led to increase in trust for the NGOs which are actually contributing for the greater good of the society and consequently helping in the upliftment of the people. 


  • JUDICIAL OFFICE : RTI has not been an act without any limitations. It has gone through major developments in accordance with the changes that have taken place in the society. One such instance is where recently the office of Chief Justice Of India has included under the purview of RTI. This has enabled the citizens to question the highest judicial body of India. 


  • EDUCATION SECTOR : Indian government has always stressed upon the need for better education. This act has led to evolvement of some revolutionary changes in the education system as it has given power to people to question government teachers and school administration which has improved the services provided by government schools. Not just this, at a higher level, aspirants of various competitive exams can call out the the selection committees if they believe that the process was unfair. 

  • ADMINISTRATION SECTOR: Various offices of government have come under the purview of this act and consequently, under the scrutiny of public. They have to answer for their actions, like a citizen can file an application against a police officer who arrests or detains a person not in accordance with law, pensioners who were not able to avail the benefit of pensions can now come forward. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree