Skip to main content

Modern Sources of Hindu Law

 Modern Sources of Hindu Law

According to Article 44 of the Indian Constitution, India is a secular state that aspires for a unified legal system throughout the country. Many believe that the Indian government's commitment to increasing uniformity of the legal system poses a threat to minority religious groups that rely on the diversity of the legal system to retain traditions and administer religious laws in accordance with their beliefs.

First and first, it is necessary to define who these laws apply to in order to properly discuss their modern application and sources of inspiration. For example, persons who adhere to Hindu religious beliefs, as well as those who are not Christian or Jewish or Muslim, may be held liable for violating Hindu personal and family rules, as defined by the Acts of Parliament listed below. Consequently, it is presumed that all Indians who do not practise Islam, Judaism, or Christianity are Hindus, neglecting the personal religious laws of adherents of Buddhist, Jain, Sikh, and other religions, resulting in divisions among these communities. Indian family courts are recognised by the Indian legal system, including Muslim, Jewish, and Christian family courts, as well as secular family courts. I Justice, equity, and good conscience- It is possible that a disagreement will come before a Court that cannot be resolved by using any existing rule found in any of the accessible sources. In such a case, the Court will rule on the merits of the case. It is feasible that such a circumstance will develop, however it is unlikely, because not every type of fact situation that arises will have a corresponding law to govern it.

In the absence of legal authority, the courts have no choice but to resolve the dispute, and they are under a responsibility to do so in such a situation as well. In such circumstances, the Courts rely on the fundamental values, norms, and standards of fairness and propriety in order to make their decisions.

This is referred to as the "principles of justice, equity, and good conscience" in formal terminology. They may also be referred to as Natural law in some circles. This principle has been recognised as a source of law in our country since the 18th century, when the British administration made it apparent that, in the absence of a rule, the preceding principle would be implemented.

In the second place, there exist laws, which are enacted by Parliament and have played a significant part in the development of Hindu law. Following India's independence, some significant components of Hindu Law were codified, including the Vedas. The Hindu Marriage Act of 1955, the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act of 1956, the Hindu Succession Act of 1956, the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act of 1956, and the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act of 1956 are only a few examples of key statutes.

Following codification, any matter addressed by the codified law is considered to be resolved. Unless an express saving is provided for in the enactment itself, the enactment supersedes all former law, whether based on tradition or on any other basis whatsoever. The old textual law contains provisions that allow it to be applied in situations where the codified law is not applicable.

It was established after the foundation of British authority that a hierarchy of Courts was established. (iii) Precedents It was decided to establish the doctrine of precedent, which is founded on the principle of treating like cases alike. Today, the decisions of the Privy Council are binding on all lower courts in India, with the exception of those where they have been modified or revised by the Supreme Court, whose rulings are obligatory on all courts, with the exception of those in which it sits.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree