Skip to main content

Process of Elections in India:

 Process of Elections in India:

Elections are held in constituencies, which are defined as geographic areas where people can vote for their representatives to represent them. In India, each constituency has a population that is roughly the same size as the previous one, which means that the number of officials is roughly the same from one state to the next. This also implies that the number of seats (for example, in the Lok Sabha) is proportional to the number of people who live in the state.

Voting Rolls are being prepared for the upcoming elections.

There are people who live in the constituencies who vote for his or her representatives or who can even run for election as candidates themselves. Electoral rolls are "lists of voters" for a particular electoral district. In India, the right to vote is granted to everyone by law. This means that every adult over the age of 18 has the right to vote and to choose his or her own representative in government. The names of all of them should then appear on the electoral rolls of their respective jurisdictions.

Political Parties Must Be Licensed to Operate:

Every eligible person can run for election in India, as long as they have a 'ticket,' which is issued by the government. Elections are registered by a political party, and individuals can also file their nomination papers. Then, each individual receives a 'ticket' from the political party that he or she is representing, and he or she can formally enter the election. Every political party has a symbol that represents them; for example, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has a lotus flower as its symbol.

Election Campaigning and Campaigning for Office:

Each of the political parties that are running for office has a distinct ideology and set of policies. They must run political campaigns for a period of approximately two weeks in order to publicise them and attract voters. Ideally, they should make an ethical effort to accomplish this by persuading voters through sound policies and plans. In India, they are given a specific expenditure limit, beyond which they are not permitted to spend any additional money.

Preparations for Election Day Elections:

Finally, the day has arrived for voters to go to the polls and cast their ballots for their preferred representative. People used to prefer to vote by ballot paper, but nowadays they prefer to use EVMs (electronic voting machines), which they activate by pressing a button next to the symbol of their preferred political party. The votes are then counted, and the candidate who receives the greatest number of votes is declared the winner of the election.

The following are the criteria for voting:

Individuals make their own decisions.

The first parameter considers why people voted for a particular candidate and the basis on which they voted for him or her. Whereas 52 percent of the population voted on the basis of work, and 45 percent of the population voted on the recognition of the single man.

If you voted, did your choice of candidate coincide with that of your parents or other members of your family?

According to the results of the survey, 12 percent of the population agrees with their candidate's choice for whom they have voted. 23 percent of those polled did not match, and 65 percent of those polled said they were unsure whether they did or did not match. This means that 65 percent of the population does not talk about the election's outcome.

Is it possible to find out what the manifesto is?

According to the results of a survey, only 54 percent of people are aware of the manifesto. And 46 percent of the population is completely unaware of it.

Is it possible to tell the difference between the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha?

According to a survey report, 80 percent of people are unsure of the difference between the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, whereas 80 percent of people are aware of the difference

A survey found that 66 percent of people vote on their own, but 34 percent of people vote on the basis of stories channel surveys, according to the results.

Take a position on the concept of faith

According to the results of the survey, 33 percent of people vote on the basis of religious beliefs. This means that the people vote for the candidate who is affiliated with their religious beliefs. A situation in which 65 percent of voters do not believe in the candidate for whom they are casting their ballot. There are 2 percent of the population who vote on the basis of religious beliefs at times.

According to a survey report, 10% of people accept money in exchange for their vote for a candidate, whereas 76 percent of people are loyal and did not accept any form of bribe in exchange for their vote.

An online survey found that 47 percent of respondents were unaware that it was a thing, while 53 percent of respondents were aware of it.

The NOTA is known by 53% of the population, but only 14% of the population uses it, and 86% of the population votes for the candidate they require, according to a survey report.

According to studies of aggregate data, despite the fact that the effect of urbanisation is becoming less significant, the extent of electoral participation has been increasing in tandem with socio-economic development over time. An increase in the rate of increase is consistent with the current socio-political situation in each state. Some studies that have been conducted to support the survey of people have revealed that the electorate has a strong level of confidence in the electoral system. Accordingly, the growing electorate reflects increased confidence in electoral politics. The electorate, despite the fact that there are numerous flaws in the voting system, is frequently referred to as having fundamental faith in it. This fundamental faith in the core of the democratic regime, namely the election system, has been maintained for more than five decades, despite several political crises, and it is significant. Because of the gradual decline in popularity of the once dominant Congress party, the peculiar pattern of party preference of each State in accordance with the actual socio-political situation, including castes, religions, backwardness, and other factors, has come to the fore. As a result, since the 1980s, there has been a transparent differentiation of the party system, heralding the beginning of the era of multi-party systems and coalition government. Many political parties have grown in support of specific ethnic groups, such as castes and religions. However, because of the aforementioned fundamental belief in the democratic regime, such an increase and strengthening of regional parties that support some particular ethnos has not necessarily brought the issue of national integration to the forefront

There is a good chance that many ethnicity-based parties are also patronage-based parties. In a country with such a diverse ethnic makeup as India, a celebration could be supported by some specific ethnic groups, but it must also articulate and integrate other ethnicities in order to grow. The requirement of moderate policy, as well as the distribution of patronage or interests among other ethnic groups, is an effective strategy for articulating and integrating other ethnicities. In contrast, if an ethnicity-based party pursues a radical and disintegrative policy with no means of distributing patronage, it will be unable to win the support of other ethnicities.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree