Skip to main content

UNEP

 UNEP

UNEP (United Nations Environmental Program) is a United Nations institution dedicated to environmental protection. They monitor each country's pollution levels. which precautions they are doing to prevent pollution, how much and for what purpose they are using their resources. Are the countries adhering to sustainable development principles? Are the sustainable development goals being met? Additionally, they monitor the country's population and death rate, as well as the amount of resources that those countries may utilise in accordance with their population and development.

Additionally, the UNEP advises countries on environmental protection. how individuals might accomplish their goals without causing harm to the environment, as well as provide ideas and ways for utilising resources in the least polluting manner possible. The UN Environment Assembly, the world's highest-level decision-making body on the environment, brings together 193 Member States and representatives from civil society, business, and other important groups and stakeholders to address environmental concerns. Rahul Chhabra has been accredited as India's Permanent Representative to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). UNEP is currently implementing numerous projects in India, with the majority of them already completed.

UNEP is concentrating its efforts on six areas:

Climate Change strengthens nations' capacity to respond to environmental change by providing initiative in the areas of variation, alleviation, innovation, and finance. UNEP is concentrating its efforts on advancing the transition to low-carbon social orders. advancing public understanding of environmental science, advancing ecologically friendly energy, and increasing public awareness Management of Post-Conflict and Disaster Situations. UNEP performs natural resource assessments in disaster-affected countries and provides guidance on implementing administrative and institutional systems for ecological management. UNEP's Post - Struggle and Debacle Exercises The Executive Branch (PCDMB) recalls Afghanistan's post-conflict ecological assessment. Lebanon. Sudan and Nigeria. Ecosystem Management enables the management and repair of ecosystems in a sustainable manner and promotes the use of ecosystem services. The Global Programme of Action (GPA) for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-Based Activities is one such example. UNEP assists nations in developing, implementing, and strengthening essential cycles, foundations, laws, policies, and initiatives that promote sustainable development at the national, local, and global levels, as well as mainstreaming climate development planning.


Substances That Are Harmful. UNEP works to mitigate the adverse effects of hazardous substances and waste on the climate and human health. UNEP has dispatched exchanges for a global mercury concession and is implementing initiatives on mercury and the Essential Way to Deal with Global Synthetic Chemicals (SAICM) to mitigate risks to human health and the environment. Efficiencies in the use of resources / Consumption and production that are sustainable. UNEP is focused on local and global efforts to ensure the creation of natural resources. prepared and burned - through in a way that is far more benign to the ecosystem. Consider the following. The Marrakesh Cycle is a globally recognised process for assisting in the development of a 10-Year Structure of Projects focused on sustainable consumption and creation.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree