Skip to main content

Vicarious Liability

 Vicarious Liability


Introduction

Every person is liable for acts, the person commits and not liable for the acts done by others but in some situations when a person is liable for the acts of another person is known as vicarious liability. So, for this to happen there must be a specific kind of relationship between both the people and the act must be connected with the relationship. These relationships can be of a master and servant or principal and agent. 

Vicarious liability is the liability of a person for an act of another person because of their relationship with each other. For eg: Saurav is the driver of Gaurav, and Gaurav sent Saurav to drop his friend Suryash to the Airport. On their way, Saurav hits Mahesh because of his reckless driving. In this situation, Gaurav was not even in the car while the car hit Mahesh, but still, he was liable for the accident caused by Saurav. This is because of vicarious liability. 

So, vicarious liabilities only deal with the situation where the person is liable for some other person’s acts. It is considered as an exception to the general rule that the person is liable for his acts only. Vicarious liability is based on the principle of ‘qui facit per se per alium facit per se’, which means ‘He who does an act through another is deemed in law to do it himself’. 

Essentials of Vicarious Liability

The essentials of vicarious liability are:

  1. There must be a certain type of relation between the parties. 

  2. The wrongful act must be committed by another person. 

  3. The wrongful act must happen during the course of employment. 

Relations in Vicarious Liability

So, this liability can only take place when one party is socially superior to another party and superior party shall be considered liable. Some examples of these relationships are:

  • Master and Servant

  • Owner and Independent Contractor

  • Partners in Partnership Firm

  • Principal and Agent

  • Company and its Directors

Reasons for Vicarious Liability

The reasons behind holding the master liable for the actions of his servant are:

  1. A servant is just an agent who is controlled and supervised by his employer. So, the servant works according to the master which means he works in the manner the master wants the work to be done. So, the liability for the actions of the servant must be of the master. 

  2. The master always enjoys the profit derived from the efforts of the servant, so he must also bear the loss that occurred by the activity of the servant but only in the course of employment. 

  3. The master is financially stable than that of a servant. So, the master is more suitable to pay for the damages caused by the tortious act of the servant. But the masters are allowed to take reasonable care and precautions to prevent himself from such situations. 

Scope of Employment

The actions of the employees related to the term of his employment are considered as the scope of employment. The scope changes through the requirements of the job and the number of people are required to do the job. There are situations where a worker is not working under the scope of employment. These include:

  • Independent Contractor 

An independent contractor is a person doing work for someone else, these contractors are not considered as employees because they are not working in the scope of employment and are certainly not considered as employer’s liability. 

  • Illegal Acts

Any illegal act is not under the scope of employment. So, any harm caused by the illegal act is mostly not considered as the employer’s liability. 

When an employee performs an activity that is neither directed nor controlled by the employer, the employee is not in the scope of employment. In this situation, if the employee engages in any wrongful tortious activity, the employer is not liable for the damages. 

For example, A is the driver of B, after dropping B to his office A left the office premises to meet his friend C with B’s car. A picked-up C, they went for a drive and had an accident. Z was injured in the accident. In this situation, B is not liable for any damages because B had no idea of A’s plan and A was not in any course of employment given by B. 

Vicarious Liability in Medical Care

For any wrongdoing caused by the employee in any medical institution, the hospital or the doctor is vicariously liable for the damages. The employees include all the nurses, technicians, physicians, lab assistants, administrative department and other staff members. 

Vicarious liability helps in improving the conditions of hospitals as the hospital is liable for all the staff. So, the hospital or any medical institution focuses on proper qualifications and credentials for the employees to perform their job but this doesn’t work for a healthcare provider who is an independent contractor of the hospital. 

For example, A had surgery at XYZ hospital and Doctor Who performed the surgery. The surgery was successful but Doctor Who forgot his ring inside A’s stomach. Now, in this case, Doctor Who is liable for negligence but A can sue both XYZ hospital as well as Doctor Who as the hospital is liable for the actions of the doctors. 

Types of Vicarious Liability

When some person is liable for damages caused by the other person because there was certain control, ownership, or direction involved, then the liability is known as vicarious liability. 

Principal Liability

When a person allows another person to use his vehicle to perform a task for the owner and while doing the task, the person causes damages or injury through negligence, in this case, the owner is liable for the damages through vicarious liability. 

For example, A has a recent surgery and was on complete bed rest, he asked B to complete his insurance work by sending the papers to the company, A lends his car to B, during the drive, B had an accident because of recklessness, in this case, A is liable for B’s accident. 

In another situation, after completing A’s work B used his car for her personal use and met an accident during the course of her work, in this situation A is not liable for B’s accident. 

This shows that the course of employment of the owner is necessary. 

Parental Liability

In any case, when a child creates damage by taking advantage of the situation created by their parents, the parents are liable for the damages. The situations can be allowing a child to drive, or leaving a loaded weapon in a child’s reach. In the lack of parental supervision, the parents are vicariously liable for their child’s negligence. 

For example, A is the mother of 10-year-old B, while performing the daily chores she was not able to keep an eye on B and B damaged the car of C. In this case, A is vicariously liable for B’s actions as B is the son of A and she has to keep an eye on B’s actions. 

Situations in which the Master is Liable

  • When the wrongdoing arrived from a natural consequence of an act of servant. 

When the servant works on the instructions of his master, then the master is liable for all the damages arriving out of the work of the servant. 

  • When the wrongdoing arrived from the negligence of the servant.

For example, B works as a house help for A, B was cleaning A’s house and forgot to close the door which resulted in the escape of their dog, the dog bit the son, A was liable for all the damages caused by B’s negligence. 

  • When the wrongdoing through the mistake in execution from the lawful authority.

For example, A is the guard of XYZ bank and he is allowed to shoot in case of emergency. One day during the transfer of the cash, B was entering with the people who were transferring the cash in the bank, A in the suspicion of B as a dacoit shot him and caused his death. In this case, the bank is vicariously liable for A’s actions. 

  • When the wrongdoing happened through the servant’s fraudulent act.

For example, A works in an insurance company, B went to the company to open insurance, A takes from B and creates a policy for his wife. In this case, the insurance company is liable for A’s fraudulent act. 

  • When the servant wilfully committed the wrong to hurt the master. 

Every wrong act of servant which is in the course of employment either wilful, reckless, or improper is liable for the master. For example, when a waiter hurts the customer for being rude to him, the waiter, as well as the hotel, is liable for the waiter’s negligence. The hotel is liable under vicarious liability. 

Exceptions

  • When the servant is under a statutory duty which he cannot delegate, the master is not liable.

  • When there is a case where the servant is involved with the withdrawal of support from the neighbouring land, the master is not liable.

  • When situations involve very hazardous acts, the master is not liable.

  • When situations involve escaping from the fire, the master is not liable.

  • When situations using the highways, the master is not liable. 

Conclusion

Vicarious liability deals with only those cases when one person is liable for the actions of another person. And the liable person must be superior to the other person. The person who commits wrong must be in the course of employment. The course of employment is essential for vicarious liability. 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

INCOME TAX SECTION 32AD - Investment in new plant or machinery in notified backward areas in certain States

 Description (1) Where an assessee, sets up an undertaking or enterprise for manufacture or production of any article or thing, on or after the 1st day of April, 2015 in any backward area notified by the Central Government in this behalf, in the State of Andhra Pradesh or in the State of Bihar or in the State of Telangana or in the State of West Bengal, and acquires and installs any new asset for the purposes of the said undertaking or enterprise during the period beginning on the 1st day of April, 2015 and ending before the 1st day of April, 2020 in the said backward area, then, there shall be allowed a deduction of a sum equal to fifteen per cent of the actual cost of such new asset for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such new asset is installed. (2) If any new asset acquired and installed by the assessee is sold or otherwise transferred, except in connection with the amalgamation or demerger or re-organisation of business referred to in clause (xiii)or cla

60 Minute Marriage Counselling Session On Phone

Description A 60 minute phone call with an expert Marriage\Relationship Counselor to discuss your marriage\relationship related issues. Counselling aims to resolve issues and improve communication in a relationship. Couples’ counselling works with both people in the relationship, however sessions can start with one individual, working towards the involvement of the other partner. What's Included a) 60 minute phone call with the counselor where you can discuss all your issues and seek guidance. What's Not Included a) Counselling session via meeting

Send Legal Notice for Divorce

 India being a secular country derives a large part of its laws from various religious practices. One such area of law is Divorce law of India. A divorce case in India can be initiated by either party based on the procedure relevant as per the law applicable to the parties. However, the procedure for divorce always starts with sending a legal notice.   Either party can send a legal notice to the other spouse intimating his/her intent to initiate legal proceedings for divorce. Sending a legal notice acts as a formal way of communication by one party to the other acting as a warning and at the same time creating chances for a last attempt for conciliation, if possible. Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue   What is a legal notice for divorce? A legal notice refers to a formal communication to a person or the opposite party in a case, informing him/her about one’s intention to undertake legal proceedings against him/her. Therefore, a legal notice for divorce is a formal inti