Skip to main content

Decoding Goods and Services Tax

 Goods and Services Taxes  (GST) in an indirect tax. It is levied on value addition achieved at each stage of supply of goods and services. It is a comprehensive, multi-stage and destination based tax.


To decipher GST, we need to first understand what the term “multi-stage” means.


Before you buy any good from the market it has to go through various stages starting from manufacture or production till final stage. The first stage is buying of raw materials leading to the second stage that is production or manufacturing of the good leading to storing and warehousing of the goods so produced and then they are finally sold to the consumers. Tax is levied on each of this stage.


Now let’s understand what is meant by value addition. Let’s consider the manufacturer wants to make a car. To start with the manufacturer will first purchase raw materials, virgin steel, petroleum-based products or other components from the supplier. Post this, he will start making the chassis and the body of the car. So the value of the raw materials or components is increased once it gets converted into the car. Then the car is sent to the warehouse for painting, labeling, internal assembly which further add values to the car. GST is levied on each of these value additions.


How is GST  levied?


Let’s understand the application of GST via a hypothetical example.


Assume that the manufacturer of a shirt pays Rs.100 to buy yarn and other raw materials. Assume that the rate of the tax is 10% and there is no profit or loss then he has to pay Rs 10 as tax, hence the cost of the shirt becomes Rs. 110.


The wholesaler buys the shirt from the manufacturer, adds values of Rs. 40. Now the cost of the shirt has increased by Rs.40 and he also pays a tax @ 10% on this and therefore the final cost of the shirt becomes Rs 165 (110+40=150, tax @of 10% =15).


The retailer buys the shirt from the wholesaler of Rs. 165 and adds a value of Rs.30. Now the cost of the shirt including tax becomes Rs. 214.5.(165+30+ tax @10%= 195 + 19.5 = 214.5).


Under this scenario, the customer pays Rs. 214.5 for a shirt that technically cost only Rs. 170 (100+40+30).


This is called the cascading effect of taxes meaning tax is paid over tax.


With the roll out of GST cascading effect of taxes will be mitigated. As per the new taxation regime credit will be available for the tax paid in the acquiring input. Hence, the individual who has paid taxes already can claim credit for the taxes which he has already paid.


In this shirt example, when the wholesaler buys the shirt from the manufacturer he has already paid a tax of Rs.10 because that was included in the cost. Further, when he adds value of Rs. 40 his cost price becomes Rs. 140 and then he pays a tax @ 10% i.e. Rs. 14 but since a tax of Rs. 10 has already been paid he can get the credit of Rs. 10 and his net tax liability will be Rs. 4.


Now the retailer will pay Rs.154 to buy the shirt (140+14). He adds value of worth Rs. 30 so now the cost of the shirt becomes Rs. 170( 100+40+30). The retailer will pay tax over this @ 10%, i.e, Rs 17 but he will pay only Rs. 3 to the government as he will get credit of Rs. 14.


Under the GST framework, the cost of the shirt to the consumer will finally be Rs. 187, i.e. Rs 170 as total cost and Rs. 17 as total tax. From Rs. 214.5 the cost of the shirt has come down to Rs. 187.


Hence, GST will reduce the burden of taxes from the consumer as he will not have to pay tax on tax. He will only liable to pay the net taxes after availing the tax credit for the taxes which have already been paid in the manufacturing process.


In a nutshell, it can be said that the GST framework will bring two-fold benefit, one it will reduce the cascading effect of the taxes and by allowing input tax credit, it will reduce the burden of taxes and hopefully the price of goods and services.


Why is GST considered so important?


GST is considered most important tax reform since 1947 because of the following reasons -


Simplified Tax Structure- In the current framework multiple taxes are exposed but after GST all these taxes will be eliminated and only GST will be levied which is way more simpler and easier to understand. A simple taxation system will lead to ease in compliance and leave the manufacturers with more time.  


A catalyst for exports- When the cost of production reduces in the domestic market, Indian goods and services will become more competitive in other in foreign markets and hence help in increasing the exports. 


Competitive Prices - GST will subsume all other types of indirect taxes. A fall in prices will lead to increase in consumption which in turn will be beneficial to the companies.


Increased revenues to government- A simpler tax structure will lead to ease of compliance and thus reducing the number of defaulters and in turn, there will be an increase in the revenue from the government.


How will GST help India and common man?

The common man has no idea about the amount of taxes he pays on goods currently. When we get a bill after buying a product, it gives the VAT we have paid which is actually an understatement of the total taxes paid. Therefore, the consumers today pay around 20% tax for every product they buy.


After GST kicks in it will help the consumer in two ways. All the taxes will be collected at the point of consumption and there will no taxes on taxes.


Few products and services will become expensive like currently, the mobile bills are attached with a Service Tax of 15% but after the implementation phone bills will attract tax at 18%. Cosmetics such as shampoos, perfumes, and makeup items will be taxed at the rate of 28% as opposed to the current rate of 22%.


All necessities and a lot  products will go cheaper like the tax on smartphones will come down from 13.5% to 12%. Or next time you go for a movie you can spend more on popcorn as the entertainment tax levied by the state have been subsumed under GST and effective rate has been kept at 18%. Transport services will also get cheaper as the effective GST rate for cab rides will be 5% as against a present rate of 6%. Your monthly grocery bill will give you happiness as food grains are exempted from taxes under GST regime.


GST will be replacing about 20 central and state taxes such as factory gate duties, service, and local taxes. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more