Skip to main content

Divorce Procedure in Delhi

 The procedure for divorce principally starts with the filing of a divorce petition as per the Indian legal procedure. Essentially, the divorce procedure in India begins when one of the parties to a divorce file a petition for divorce and the other party is served a notice for the same to appear in the court.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue


In case things are not working out between a couple and it is becoming difficult for both of them to cope-up with each other in a marriage, one can part ways legally by filing a ‘mutual divorce’ petition under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. A mutual divorce petition can only be filed when both parties are willing to get divorced. However, one can file for divorce even when the other party is not willing to get a divorce by filing a petition for ‘contested divorce’.


The procedures for filing for Mutual or Contested divorce have been discussed below:

 


What is the procedure to file for Mutual Divorce in Delhi?

The provision for divorce by mutual consent has been given under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. In situations where both the spouses are willing to terminate the wedlock, they can go ahead with mutual consent divorce. It is the easiest way of terminating a marriage legally. The essential ingredient for a mutual consent divorce is the consent of both husband and wife. However, under the mutual consent divorce, the only two things that have to be worked out between the spouses is custody of the children and maintenance. The procedure for filing for mutual divorce has been explained below:

 

Filing of petition:

The husband and wife seeking divorce by mutual consent have to file a joint petition before the court for dissolution of marriage on the ground that they have been staying away from each other for more than a year or stating that they have not been able to stay together and have decided to dissolve the marriage with mutual consent.

 

Court appearance and scrutinizing the petition:

After the petition is filed, a date is fixed for scrutinizing the petition and for the appearance of the parties. On the date of appearance, both the parties have to appear before the court with their respective lawyers. The court then scrutinizes the petition along with the documents filed. It also asks if there is a possibility of reconciliation between the parties, and if there stands no possibility for the same it proceeds with the mutual divorce. Upon satisfaction on scrutinizing the petition, the court may record the statements of the parties.


Consult: Top Divorce Lawyers in India


Passing of first motion:

The court, after recording the statements, passes an order for the first motion. After passing the first motion, the parties are given a six months period, which is also known as the cooling-off period, only after which the second motion can be filed by the parties. Within the six months period during the pendency of the petition, either party can withdraw the mutual divorce petition by filing an application for withdrawal of divorce by mutual consent. However, recently the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment that the cooling-off period can be waived at the discretion of the court. Unless the petition is withdrawn or the cooling-off period has been waived, the second motion has to be filed within a period of 18 months from the filing of the petition.

 

Passing of second motion:

If the parties still want to go ahead with the proceedings after the six months period is over they can proceed with the final hearing and can file for the passing of the second motion. If the second motion is not filed within 18 months of the filing of divorce petition the court will not pass the decree for divorce. The parties can still withdraw their consent before the decree for divorce is passed.

 

Decree of Divorce:

Before the decree for divorce is given by the court, all the issues related to alimony, custody, maintenance, property distribution, etc. must be resolved between the parties. Thus, once there is complete agreement between the parties and the court is satisfied that there is no possibility of reconciliation between the parties, it would pass the decree for divorce declaring the marriage to be dissolved.

 


Documents and Information required for Mutual Divorce in Delhi

Documents required to file a Mutual Divorce petition have been listed below:


Address proof of husband and wife


Present earning details of both husband and wife


Marriage certificate of the couple


Information proving the family background


Wedding photographs of the couple


Evidence proving separation of husband and wife for more than a year


Evidence to prove failed attempts of reconciliation


Statements of income tax of the both the spouses


Details of assets held by husband and wife.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


What is the procedure to file for Contested Divorce in Delhi?

In situations where one of the parties to the marriage wants divorce, however, the other party is not willing to give his or her consent for the same, the party wanting divorce can file a petition for contested divorce. A petition for contested divorce can be filed based on certain grounds only which are as follows:


If either spouse has not been heard of as being alive for period of seven years or more by persons who would have otherwise heard of him/her as being alive;


If either spouse has had sexual intercourse outside the marriage;


If either spouse is subjecting the other to cruelty;


If either spouse has deserted the other for a continuous period of not less than two years immediately preceding the filing of the petition in the court.


If either spouse has seized to be an Hindu;


If either spouse is incurably of unsound mind or continuously or intermittently has been suffering from a mental disorder;


If either spouse is suffering from a virulent and incurable form of leprosy;


If either spouse is suffering from a contagious venereal disease;


If either spouse renounces the worldly pleasure by entering any religious order.


The procedure for filing for contested divorce has been stated below:


Petition for contested divorce:

In a contested divorce, the husband or wife seeking divorce has to file a contested divorce petition before the court. The petition has to be accompanied with documents proving the marriage and the allegations made in the petition based on which divorce is sought. An affidavit and a vakalatnama bearing the signature of the party contested is also required to be attached with the petition.

 

Scrutinizing the petition and sending notice to the defendant:

Once the petition is filed, a date is fixed for scrutinizing the petition and for hearing the opening arguments of the petitioner. If the court is satisfied that the petition is filed with all the requisite documents and the grounds mentioned therein are valid, it would admit the petition and will issue a notice to the defendant for appearance along with a copy of the divorce petition. The defendant will then file a reply to the divorce petition and any other applications as required in the matter.


Consult: Top Divorce Lawyers in India


Direction for mediation:

The court may then direct the parties to resolve their issue through mediation and in case the mediation is not successful the court will continue with the divorce proceedings.

 

Recording evidence and framing issues:

The court will then continue with the matter and would frame issues and record evidence submitted by both the parties. The evidence and witness will then be cross-examined by both the parties. This part of the procedure is the most crucial part in deciding the fate of the case.

 

Final arguments and verdict:

After the evidence is recorded and cross-examined, both the parties will submit their final arguments before the court and would fix a date to pronounce the final decision. Then it will give its final verdict on the date fixed by it based on the arguments advanced by both the parties. In case either party is not happy with the judgment, it can file an appeal against the same within 3 months from the date of pronouncement of the judgment.

 


Documents required for Contested Divorce in Delhi:

Documents required to file a contested divorce petition have been listed below:


Address proof of husband and wife


Wedding photographs


Certificate of marriage


Evidence supporting the ground on which divorce is sought


Professional and financial proofs


Details of assets held by husband and wife.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue


If you are going through a divorce or are planning to file for one, talk to a divorce attorney in Delhi to figure out your options. It is always helpful to work out all the options beforehand when one is planning to get a divorce and an experienced divorce lawyer can help you figure out various complex questions involved with a divorce process, such as alimony and child custody.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more