Skip to main content

​Extension of limitation period in legal matters during lockdown

 The breakdown of novel COVID-19 has forced the government to implement various strict measures to flatten the curve which has consequentially given rise to new problems such as supply chain disruptions. The same has further given rise to various legal issues like parties not performing their obligations in a contract. Similarly, due to shutting down of the legal sector any potential or ongoing litigation has also been put on hold raising concerns in the public about time restrictions that are required to be followed in a case.


The law prescribes certain time restrictions that are to be followed while initiating or during the trial in different cases. However, legal matters arising during the period of lockdown cannot be initiated by the parties within the limitation period due to the shutting down of Courts as a result of the complete lockdown being implemented in the country.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


What is Limitation Period in Legal Matters?

The limitation period in legal matters refers to the maximum time that is set under the law that the parties involved have to initiate the legal proceedings from the date of an alleged offense, whether civil or criminal. Although, the length of time the statute allows for a victim to bring legal action against the suspected wrong-doer can vary from one jurisdiction to another.


In general, the limitation period allowed under the law varies depending upon the nature of the offense. Usually, the limitation period apply to civil cases, however, criminal offenses can also have a limitation period. Cases involving serious crimes, such as murder, typically have no limitation period.

 


Extension of Limitation Period during the lockdown

As stated above, the lockdown has severely affected the functioning of courts across the country apart from having other adverse effects. In furtherance to complete lockdown in the country, the Supreme Court, various High Courts, and tribunals across the country have issued circulars restricting the functioning of Courts to only ‘extremely urgent matters’, ultimately resulting in the effective closure of Courts. Since only extremely urgent matters are being taken up through the mode of video conferencing, the courts have also taken into consideration the fate of “routine matters” that would go unattended during the lockdown period.


Consult: Top Civil Lawyers in India


In view of the extraordinary circumstances, the Indian courts have taken suo motu cognizance of the issues that might be faced by the people during the lockdown, such as the fate of the matters that were yet to be filed and the matters where deadlines for filings would fall within the lockdown period. The High Court of Delhi first addressed the issue of limitation wherein its order dated 23rd March it stated that the limitation for any court proceeding shall not run w.e.f. 23rd March 2020 to 04th April 2020 subject to further orders.


Similarly, the Supreme Court, on the very same day passed an order in a suo moto case on the issue of law of imitation stating the following:

“To obviate such difficulties and to ensure that the lawyers/ litigants do not have to come physically to file such proceedings in respective Courts/ Tribunals across the country including this Court, it is hereby ordered that a period of limitation in all such proceedings, irrespective of the limitation prescribed under general law or Special Laws whether condonable or not shall stand extended w.e.f. 15th March, 2020 till further orders to be passed by this Court in present proceedings.”


Therefore, till further orders are passed by the Apex Court, the prescribed limitation period shall be extended w.e.f 15th March, 2020. In case the prescribed limitation period for filing any petition/application/appeal has been expired within the said period of lockdown, the same would be required to be filed on reopening of courts after lockdown has been lifted. However, as stated in the order the limitation period would end upon further orders being passed by the Supreme Court.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


How can a lawyer help you?

If you wanted to initiate a case but could not due to the lockdown in force and are worried that the filing of your case may go beyond the deadline, it is important for you to understand the technicalities of the law involved. This is why it is recommended to have a civil lawyer by your side who can guide you with the correct procedures to be followed in unprecedented situations like these. A civil lawyer, owing to his years of experience, can assist you in filing your case and can ensure that the case is not beaten up on the technicalities while undermining its merits.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more