Skip to main content

Homebuyers: Here is how RERA will protect you

With the real estate developers delaying projects, overcharging and engaging in other fraudulent practices, home buyers are usually left at the mercy of powerful builders. Over 80% of the 25 lakh odd residential projects launched over 10 years have been delayed. Homebuyers put their entire life’s hard earned money to buy their dream house and are ultimately left at whims of the builder. Currently, homebuyers do not have a point of contact to track the progress of a project, builders advertise and sell ambiguous super built-up area.  


To resolve the helpless of homebuyers, the government has introduced RERA which puts buyer’s interest in the forefront. In the RERA era, the homebuyer is the king and the builders will have to ensure compliance to avoid punishment. The National Capital Region-Delhi accounted for most delays, followed by the Mumbai Metropolitan Region. Ahmedabad, Kolkata, Pune, Bengaluru, Hyderabad and Chennai didn’t fare much better. As per RERA each State and Union Territory will have its own regulator and set of rules to govern the functioning of the regulator. Following are the ways in which RERA protects you:-


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


Builders need to compulsorily register with RERA

To track down fraud builders and protect buyer’s interest, a developer has to register with the regulatory authority before he starts to invite, advertise, sell, offer, market or book any plot.  After registration, all the advertisement inviting investment will have to bear unique RERA registration number. The registration number will be provided projects. For the projects that are already ongoing on the date of the commencement of this Act are required to register within three months since 1st May 2017.

 


Limitation on accepting advance payment

To further protect the interests of the buyers, RERA mandates that the developer cannot ask for more than 10% of the property’s cost as an advanced payment booking amount before actually signing a registered sale agreement.  

 


Restriction on using of funds received for a project

The promoter of the project is required to maintain a separate escrow account for each of their projects and deposit 70% of the money received from investors and buyers in that account. This money has to be only used for the construction of the project and the cost borne towards the land.


Consult: Top RERA Lawyers in India

 


Track the status of projects, clearances obtained etc

To bring transparency and accountability and instil confidence of the homebuyers in the builders, builders are required to have trustworthy credentials before commencing any project. They need to register under RERA state authority and submit all information pertaining to clearances obtained from various departments, annual reports, balance sheet, cash flow statement and auditor’s report.

 


Assurance of Quality

Homebuyers suffer on account of the poor quality of construction material used by the builders. RERA addresses this issue by ensuring a quality check on the flats constructed by builders. The regulator will ensure protection to buyers in the matter from five years from the date of possession. During this five year period, if the buyer highlights any issue with respect to quality of construction before the regulator, then the builder is under an obligation to rectify the same within 30 days.

 


Delay in completion of a project

Builders cannot delay delivery of flats to homebuyers. Projects need to be completed on time and failing which buyers will have to compensate homebuyers with an interest rate of State Bank of India’ highest marginal cost of lending rate plus two per cent within 45 days of it becoming due. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more