Skip to main content

How to File a Cheque Bounce Case

 How to file a Cheque Bounce case?

Cheque bounce is a criminal offence in India, covered under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The following information will act a useful guide in what steps can be undertaken in case your cheque is bounced:


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


Sending a Demand Notice:

Once the cheque has been returned by the bank, then before filing a legal complaint against the drawer, you must, with the help of a cheque bounce lawyer, first send a demand letter/ legal notice to such drawer within a period of 30 days from the date the cheque has been returned to you by the bank. The letter must demand the amount from the drawer and also the legal action that can be initiated against him under the Negotiable Instruments Act in case the amount is not paid within a stipulated time period (usually 15 days).


Even though there is no prescribed format for this notice, its purpose of demanding payment and informing the issuer that s/he will be prosecuted in case payment is not made should be highlighted very clearly. Further, proof of delivery of such letter should be preserved carefully.


Demand letter can be sent by the complainant her/himself. However, it is advisable to get the draft vetted by a cheque bounce lawyer before sending it to the person concerned.


 

The following information should be stated clearly in the demand notice:

A statement that the cheque was presented within its period of validity


Statement of debt or legally enforceable liability


Information regarding dishonour of cheque as given by the bank


Demanding the issuer to pay the amount due within 15 days of receiving such notice


Consult: Top Cheque Bounce Lawyers in India 

 


Drafting a Complaint:

If the drawer has not replied to your demand notice within a period of 15 days from the date of the delivery of the demand letter or has refused to pay your amount, then the next option available in such a case is to file a complaint in court within a stipulated time period of 30 days. Before filing a legal complaint, it is important to understand which court you should approach in such cases. You can file the complaint in a court within whose local limits of jurisdiction any of the following incidents have taken place:


Where the cheque was drawn


Where the cheque was presented


Where the cheque was returned by the bank


Where the demand notice was served by you


You must have all the following documents:


Complaint


Oath letter


Photocopy of all the documents such as cheque, memo, notice copy, and acknowledgment receipts


 


Payment of Court Process fees for filing a Cheque Bounce case

While filing a cheque bounce complaint, the complainant is required to pay court fees. The Court fees vary depending upon the amount of the cheque against which the complaint is being filed. The requisite court fees for various cheque amounts have been listed below:


Amount on cheque                          Court fee

Rs. 0 to Rs. 50,000/-                            Rs. 200


Rs. 50,000/- to Rs. 2,00,000/-              Rs. 500


Above Rs. 2,00,000/-                           Rs. 1000


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


Court Notice to Accused

After the complaint being filed by the payee, court issue summons to the accused person who owes the money to the person who filed the complaint.

 


Evidence

The Complainant with the help of his/her cheque bounce lawyer puts forward all the evidence like original bounced Cheque, Cheque Return Memo, Record of sending a demand notice to accused and all other relevant documents in support of his/her case to prove that accused is under a legal obligation to pay the stated amount in the bounced cheque.

 


Punishment and Penalty

After the whole trial process, If found guilty, the accused can be punished with a monetary penalty which may be double of the amount of cheque or imprisonment up to 2 years or both.


Consult: Top Cheque Bounce Lawyers in India 

 


Memo of Advocate is essential at the time of filing of the suit along with signatures of the complainant

After the case is filed in the court, all documents are cross-checked by Judicial Magistrate First Class, so original documents such as original cheque (bounced), original memo, a copy of the notice, receipt of the post office, receipt of U.P.C., acknowledgement receipt, are required at the time of cross-checking


The period of limitation is also verified at this stage


The Process Form, also known as the Bhatta, is filed by the complainant or lawyer, along with the address of accused


The court then issues summons to accused to appear in the court on the specific date


If the accused does not appear in court on the date of hearing, the court can also issue a bailable warrant on the request of the complainant


It the accused still does not appear before the court, the court may issue a non-bailable warrant of arrest



Important things to be kept in mind

A delay in filing the complaint after the lapse of 30 days may be excused by the magistrate only in exceptional circumstances


Dishonour of a cheque due to stop payment is also covered under Section 138 of the NI Act


Presentation of the cheque at the request of the drawer after the demand notice has been sent and the consequent dishonour of the cheque will not mean that the drawer’s time limit under the notice has increased


A cheque issued as a gift/donation/any other obligation, will not be covered under Section 138 of the Act. For this section to apply, the cheque has to carry a legal obligation


A cheque expires after three months from the date on which it is issued


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


How can a lawyer help you in the process?

A lawyer having a significant amount of experience in the field of cheque bounce issues can be of great help if you are facing dishonor of cheque. An experienced cheque bounce attorney can ensure that you have made a strong case when you are filing or defending a cheque bounce complaint. He can take care of all the paperwork and can help you understand all the complexities of a cheque bounce case. He can draft and send, on your behalf, legal notice or a reply to a legal notice in case of dishonor of cheque and can track the limitation period for your case so that you do not suffer any legal damage. Thus, a cheque bounce attorney can help you throughout your legal journey and can ensure low chances of failure in your cheque bounce case.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more