Skip to main content

How to file a Consumer Complaint

 Following are the steps to be followed and points to be kept in mind while filing a consumer complaint at the District Forum or State or National commission.


 


Jurisdiction

Depending on the relief claimed, a consumer complaint will be filed at the District, State or National Commission.


District Forum: When relief claimed is less that Rs. 20, 00, 000/-;

State Commission: When relief claimed is more than Rs. 20, 00, 000/- but less than Rs. 1, 00, 00, 000/-;

National Commission: When the relief claimed exceeds Rs. 1, 00, 00, 000/-.

 


Fee:

The prescribed fee payable for filing a complaint before the District Forum, State or National Commission is as follows:


Relief Claimed


Prescribed Fee


District Forum


Upto 1 Lakh          


Rs.100/-


1 Lakh to 5 Lakh      


Rs.200/-


5 Lakh to 10 Lakh       


Rs.400/-


10 Lakh to 20 Lakh   


Rs.500/-


State Commission


20 Lakh to 50 Lakh


Rs.2000


50 lakh to 1 crore


Rs.4000


National Commission


Above One Crore Rupees


Rs.5000


 

The prescribed has to be paid via Demand Draft. Rule 9A of the Consumer Protection Actsays every complaint shall be accompanied by a crossed DD from a Nationalised Bank or crossed Indian postal order in favour of the President- District Forum, Registrar- State Commission, or Registrar NCDRC, payable at the respective place where the District Forum, State Commission or National Commission is situated.


 


Appearance:

A consumer complaint can be filed by the consumer her/himself in person or by her/his authrorised representative. In consumer cases, there is no requirement for a lawyer or a consumer group to file the complaint.


 


Filing:

The following points should be kept in mind while filing a consumer complaint.


The complaint can be sent by Registered Post to the District Forum or State Commission.

Minimum of five copies of the complaint have to be filed.

Three copies have to be in green legal paper (some forums accept white also) plus one for the Office of the Forum and one for the Opposite Party.

Complainant should keep one copy for her/himself and get a receiving on the same.

An additional copy for each opposite party has to be filed.

Since the Forum / Commission have the power to pass ex parte orders or dismiss your complaint, please ensure that you carry out regular follow-up after filing the complaint. Every hearing date has to be attended to prevent any damage to the complaint.


 


Representation:

The complaint should be signed by the complainant.

In case the complainant is authorising someone else to sign, the same should be accompanied by an authorisation letter.

In the event of the death of the complainant, the legal representatives can continue on her/his behalf.

 


Format and Content:

A consumer complaint should contain the following information:


Cause Title: Where the complaint is being filed and by who against who

Heading: Under what section of the Consumer Protection Act is it being filed.

Memo of parties: Included the name, description and address of the complainant and the opposite party/parties.

Facts relating to the complaint and how it arose.

Sections under which the opposite parties are to be held liable.

How the parties are liable to be proceeded against and why are they answerable to the complainant.

Annexures: Copies of all relevant documents in support of allegations made in the complaint should be furnished.

A signed list of such documents should also be furnished along with the complaint.

 


Compensation:

In cases of damage due to negligence, negligence or deficiency must be alleged, defined and established in order to get compensation under the Act.

There is no ceiling on the compensation claimed, and hence the same may also be sought on account of consequential damage.

The value of relief claimed will include refunds, damages, litigation costs and interest.

For compensation, the total amount should be broken up and it should be explained how it was arrived at.

If the relief cannot be quantified, a notional value should be given to it.

The relief should be clearly stated, i.e. whether the complainant wants the removal of defects, replacement of goods, refund of excess price, refund of charges paid for deficient services, etc.

 


Important Points:

State the jurisdiction and how the case falls within that jurisdiction. Eg. whether the opposite party resides or carries on business or has a branch office or personally works within the jurisdiction of the Forum or whether the cause of action started within the Forum’s jurisdiction.

The cause of action can be defined as the factor from which this dispute arose.  l.The relief which the complainant is seeking: here state whether you want removal of defects, replacement of goods, refund of excess price, refund of charges paid for deficient services, cessation of unfair trade practice, correction of misleading advertisements etc. apart from damages and costs of filing the complaint.

The period of limitation for a consumer complaint is two years from the day when the cause of action arose.

Condonation of delay is allowed in cases where there is a just cause for the delay.

Collective case can be filed by consumers facing the same problem.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more