Skip to main content

How to file a PIL (Public Interest Litigation)?

 Public Interest Litigation, as the name suggests is litigation in the interest of public. It is the power given to the general public to raise their voice in the court of law for public issues. PIL is the legal action taken by a public spirited person so as to protect the public interest.  


Any individual of the belief that injustice is being done to the public or society can approach the court for judicial remedies. Even though it is always recommended to hire a PIL lawyer for filing of PIL, a lay man can also file and argue the PIL in front of the Court.


Consult: Top PIL/Civil Lawyers in India

 


What can a PIL be filed for?

As stated earlier, PIL can be filed for any matter of public interest at large. A few important subjects for which PIL filing is popular have been stated below:


Violation of fundamental rights or any other legal right guaranteed by laws;


In matters of (violation of) basic human rights of the poor ;


To ensure government authorities or municipal authorities perform their public duties;


For conduct of government policy. 


 


Who can file a PIL?

Initially, only a person whose interest was directly affected along with the others, could file a PIL. However, now, the trend has changed for the good and any ‘public-spirited’ person can file a PIL on behalf of, or for a group of persons whose rights are affected. It is thus not necessary that the individual filing a PIL should have a direct interest in the matter. However, it should not be filed with a private interest and for private reasons, but only for the good of the public at large. 


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


How can a lawyer help in filing a PIL?

A lawyer can help you in the entire procedure of preparing, filing and presenting your PIL in the appropriate court. A PIL advocate has the requisite experience in PIL matters. He/She is an expert in the art of drafting with all the information. He/she also has the expertise to present arguments in the Court with utmost precision and craft. With the increasing number of frivolous and bizarre PILs in the Courts each day, the Courts have become wary of accepting each and every PIL. Each PIL is scrutinized in great detail by the courts and only then the decision of acceptance or rejection of the petition is taken. This is why it is very important to consult a lawyer before filing a PIL. 


A good PIL lawyer will ensure that your PIL has a good motive and is not rejected for want of sufficient reason. He/she will also ensure that your petition is well drafted without any errors and unnecessary contents. You will be thoroughly assisted by the lawyer in the entire procedure and its requirements. He/She would also be able to ensure that your PIL has been filed in the correct court, thus reducing the chances of your PIL getting thrown away/rejected. All in all, you will end up saving your time and hiring a PIL lawyer will make sure that your experience throughout is hassle free.  


 


Where can an individual file a PIL?

Both the High Court and the Supreme Court have the authority to entertain Public Interest Litigation. If the matter upon which the PIL is filed concerns individuals, authorities, etc. confined to a particular State only, High Court (under Article 226 of the Constitution) would be the appropriate platform, whereas, if the matter concerns individuals or authorities at the central level, the Supreme Court (under Article 32 of the Constitution) shall be the appropriate platform. 


Consult: Top PIL/Civil Lawyers in India

 


What is the procedure to file a PIL?

If a citizen of the country has a good reason to file a PIL, the first step that he/she needs to undertake is to do a thorough research on the matter. One should ensure that no similar PIL or case has been filed or settled before by the judiciary. The affected groups of individuals should be consulted. One needs to collect all relevant information including data and documents to strengthen the case. It is advised that one should hire an advocate since he would already be experienced in the entire procedure, including drafting of the petition and presenting the arguments. However, if you decide to argue yourself and not hire an advocate, you should at least consult one in order to be better prepared for the whole course. 


Once all the information has been gathered, the individual is required to draft the petition stating all facts and prayers that are sought from the Court. Once the PIL petition has been readied, you would be required to file it in the appropriate Court. A PIL is filed in the same manner as a writ petition is filed either in the High Court or the Supreme Court. 


If you are filing in the High Court, two copies of the petition would have to be given to the Court. A copy of the PIL petition would also have to be served to each respondent/other party in advance. The proof that the copies have been given to the respondents in advance has to be affixed upon the petition.


If the PIL filing is supposed to be made in the Supreme Court, five copies of the petition would have to be filed before the Court. In this case, Respondents are to be served with copies of the PIL only once the notice is issued from the Court. 


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


What is the average cost to file a PIL?

Filing a PIL is inexpensive compared to most of the other court cases. The Court fee would approximately be of Rs. 50 for each respondent. However, if you hire a PIL lawyer, (which is recommended since a lawyer has knowledge and experience in making petitions after gathering facts and framing arguments and presenting them in court), your cost would depend on the charges of the lawyer you hire.

 


Are there any issues/matters for which PIL cannot be filed?

Yes, there are several subjects for which PILs cannot be filed. These topics pertain to matters wherein individuals’ private interests lie. The Supreme Court has set some guidelines, according to which certain matters cannot be allowed in the form of PILs. These are:


Service matters;


Landlord and Tenant matters;


Pension and gratuity matters;


Matters related to admission in medical and other educational institutions;


Petitions for early hearing of cases pending in the High Court or other subordinate courts;


Complaints against Central and State government departments and Local Bodies, except those relating to items 1-10 as mentioned in the said guidelines by the Supreme Court.

 


Consult: Top PIL/Civil Lawyers in India

 


Misuse of PILs

Considering the huge number of cases pending before the Courts in the country, misuse of PILs is a growing concern. Due to the increasing number of frivolous PILs, the Supreme Court laid down the guidelines to be followed by Courts in entertaining PILs. PILs that are frivolous and/or filed for personal interest only add unnecessary strain on the judiciary and in turn lead to delay in justice for and disposal of genuine cases. Therefore, it is very necessary to file only those PILs that can lead to a positive change and help the common good. 


Even though misuse of Public Interest Litigation is a disconcerting issue, it is nonetheless a revolutionary concept that enables the common man to fight for the benefit of the public at large. Several PILs have shown extremely positive results and have led to developments, such as promoting greater enforcement of women’s rights against sexual harassment at workplace through the Vishakha judgment, stricter laws against polluting industries through M.C. Mehta judgment, etc. All in all, if the power of PILs is used judiciously, it can be of great benefit to the under-priviledged, environment and public health, and against exploitation of the weaker sections and consumers. Over the years, Public Interest Litigation has achieved a place of immense importance in India’s legal system and rightly so. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree