Skip to main content

Legal considerations for every startup business

 According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, Start-up means “the act or an instance of setting in operation or motion”.


Here’s a quick guide for startups to know the basic incorporation and other legalities involved.

 


Registration of a start-up:

It is very important for a start-up to be in a legal form of business. It can be a one-person company, private limited company, partnership firm, limited liability partnership or sole proprietorship.


The whole point here is to analyze what can be the best option for your start-up considering the budget of the organization:


A single founder looking to start a Private Limited Company can choose One Person Company initially which mandatorily gets converted into private limited company subject to fulfillment of certain conditions as laid down in Companies Act, 2013.


Single founder or multiple founders having individuals or businesses as customers and amount involved in a transaction is high, should choose between private limited company, LLP or one person company.


Single founder or multiple founders who are not confident enough about their start-up should stick to Sole proprietorship or Partnership respectively.


Labour Laws:

Human resources related laws or employment laws in India do not stem from any single legislation and there are over 200 laws at the federal level and the state level. Essentials one include:


Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013


Maternity Benefit Act, 1961


Equal Remuneration Act, 1976


Payment of Bonus Act, 1965


The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972


Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952


Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948


Employment Exchanges (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959


Financing:

Venture Capital investment is the most formal way. Despite the young age of the start-up, the investor will usually conduct a due diligence on the Company.

 


Obtaining a License:

Licensing depends on the nature of business. One should contact their counsel for details regarding the same as ignorance of law is not an excuse in legal matters.

 


Contract Law: 

Contracts are indispensable tools of entrepreneurs. Hence, basic knowledge of certain fundamental principles of contracts certainly helps. Contract Law in India is governed under the Indian Contracts Act, 1872.

 


Ways of Dispute Resolution: 

Disputes are inevitable in today’s business world. Knowledge always helps whether it is about the formal (how court cases work) and informal (arbitration, mediation, conciliation, etc.) ways of dispute resolution.

 


Accounts and Taxation:

Indian Tax laws are divided into two types: Direct Taxes, as the name suggests, are taxes that are directly paid to the government by the taxpayer. It is a tax applied on individuals and organizations directly by the government e.g. income tax, corporation tax, wealth tax etc. Indirect Taxes are applied on the manufacture or sale of goods and services.

 


Risk Management:

A start-up should keep in mind, the risk involved in the day to day regime of their work:


For an e-commerce/internet based company:

The minimization of the liability of the start-up on the internet largely depends on the nature of representations made by the start-up on its website, like Terms of Use, privacy policies, and the usage agreements.


The IT Act, 2000:

With the computerization of the Ministry of Company Affairs, digital signatures have gained significance as a convenient way for foreign companies to conduct their Indian operations. This act recognizes such transactions.


Content Regulation:

Laws primarily applicable include the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 and the IT Act itself, amongst others.

 


Intellectual Property Laws:

 

There are broadly five types of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR’s) that a startup needs to protect to leverage its intellectual property, which are: (a) Patents, (b) Copyrights, (c) Trademarks, (d) Designs, and (e) Trade Secrets.


The information provided in the article is a general overview on how a Start-up should be legally ready. One should always consult a Lawyer and other professionals for customized service according to the Start-up’s requirement.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree