Skip to main content

Property Dispute and Family Settlement

 WHAT DOES PROPERTY DISPUTE MEAN?

As the name suggests, property dispute is a legal dispute related to property in India. About 66% of all cases in India are property-related disputes. There are various types of property disputes. These could often arise through claims from co-owners, family, legal heirs, misrepresentation by seller, bad title of property, disputes related to property acquired as a gift or through Will, disputes related to easements rights, etc. 


Wars over wealth (including property) take place across every stratum - from low-income households to ultra-rich families, hence making property disputes (within families) a common occurrence in India. The obvious solution for most is to drag the matter to the court instead of settling down. However, most people don’t realize that apart from being a tedious and expensive process, courts in no way guarantee a satisfactory resolution. It is, therefore, advisable to opt for a family settlement. Here are some points that will make you understand the concept of settlement better.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


WHAT IS FAMILY SETTLEMENT?

In a nutshell, a family settlement is an agreement where family members mutually work out how a property should get distributed among themselves. All the parties should be related to each other and have a claim to a share of the disputed property. The latter need not be limited to real estate, but can also cover movable assets like jewellery or money in bank accounts. A family settlement is usually used to settle common property or joint property that the family owns as opposed to individual or self-acquired property.


 


PARTITION THROUGH FAMILY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT:

A family settlement is an agreement between family members, generally made to avoid any court disputes and divide the family property with mutual understanding. A family settlement agreement is made in the same format of a partition deed. Moreover, a family settlement agreement does not require registration and stamping.


A family settlement agreement must be signed by all the members of the family voluntarily, without any fraud, coercion or pressure from any family member. In addition to this, it is not necessary that the family settlement agreement is drafted in a written document and can be executed either by a compromise or by a mutual understanding between the family members.

 


USPs:

For those who wish to avoid protracted, public and messy court battles


Quicker, more harmonious way to resolve disputes.


Consult: Top Property Lawyers in India

 


PROCEDURE:

A family settlement is a conciliation process where a third person, usually a lawyer or a senior family member, helps the family arrive at a mutually acceptable solution to the property dispute.


A family settlement may not be a single legal document incorporating the distribution of the property; it can also be a series of documents spelling out the property rights of each of the family members.


A settlement instrument is neither a gift nor a transfer of property as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, separate transfer of property documents will have to be drawn up in addition to the said family agreement in order to bring about an actual transfer. The tax fact must be taken into consideration while a transfer of property is decided.



PARTITION/  SETTLEMENT SUIT IN FAMILY DISPUTES IN INDIA:

Now, before a case is filed in court for partition of property, a legal notice has to be sent to the other co-owners of the property regarding family property partition/ settlement. The legal notice for partition suit must state the shares of each co-owner, complete details of the property in dispute and the requisite action required to be taken. If the co-owners do not reply to the legal notice or send an insufficient reply, a partition suit can be filed in the court.


A partition suit is a court case filed when none of the co-owners agrees to the terms and conditions of property division, and one or more co-owners want to divide the property according to their shares. A suit for partition is filed in the court which has jurisdiction over the area in which the property is located.


The court first determines whether the person who has filed the partition suit has a rightful claim in the property or not. One the share is established and no additional inquiry is needed, the court may assign individual ownership of the property to the co-owners.


If the property cannot be distributed merely on the partition suit, the court may order for an inquiry to be conducted and pass a preliminary or initial decision for appointment of a Commissioner who will then evaluate the property and submits a report. The court then determines the share of each co-owner on the basis of the said report and divide the property according to each co-owner’s share.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


CAN FAMILY SETTLEMENT OF SELF-ACQUIRED PROPERTY TAKE PLACE?

Self-acquired property settlement can't be executed during the lifetime of a person who had acquired it, but at the same time, the self-acquired property automatically becomes a part of the ancestral property on the death of such person. However, the person can assign the self-acquired property through his/ her will to any person he desires.

 


LEGAL REQUIREMENTS:

Merely reaching a consensus is not enough; there are a few legal formalities that must be completed to ensure that the agreement is valid.


The settlement document must be signed by all the family members involved. A missing signature can easily become ground for challenging the document in court at a later date.


As a safety measure, the document should be attested by two witnesses, though it is not mandatory.


Consult: Top Property Lawyers in India

 


REGISTRATION:

The next step is to register the agreement. According to Section- 17 of the Indian Registration Act, a family settlement that purports to assign immovable property must be mandatorily registered or the deed would be invalid. A stamp duty is applicable to such deeds and the amount would depend on the value of the property involved.

 


BINDING FACTOR:

While a duly executed family settlement cannot be revoked, except by a court decree, it can be challenged in a court of law under the following circumstances.


An agreement that is brought about by fraud or coercion


Any misrepresentation of facts regarding the title of the disputed property, too, can lead to future altercations.


Improper execution.

 


Paying heed to these common tripwires while drawing out an agreement will result in a foolproof, amicable and binding family settlement, which benefits everybody.

 


WHY DO YOU NEED A LAWYER?

Sometimes the law and the legal framework can get confusing and difficult to understand, especially when the issue is regarding a dispute related to family property. In such a scenario, one may not realize how to determine the legal issue, the area to which the issue relates to, whether the issue requires going to court and, how the court procedure works. Seeing a lawyer and getting some legal advice can enable you to comprehend your choices and can give you the certainty to enable yourself to determine your legal recourse.


An experienced property attorney can give you expert advice on how to handle your property issue owing to his years of experience in handling such cases. An experienced property lawyer is an expert on the laws and can help you avoid significant mistakes that may cause financial harm or will require future legal proceedings to correct. Thus, by hiring an attorney a person can make sure that he can avoid delay and get your share in the property as quickly as possible.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ADDRESSING THE ISSUE TIMELY

Property disputes between siblings are a common occurrence in India these days. Legal disputes over property take place across people at different levels in the society, be it households with low-income or wealthy families. Even a will as strong as iron can be challenged by the unhappy beneficiaries and the property can be put to dispute for years unless resolved by the courts. Thus, it is important to deal with the issue as soon as possible with the help of an experienced property lawyer, who can guide you with the case and can help you get your share in the property in an effective and less time-consuming manner.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree