Skip to main content

Reasons to create your last Will

 A will or testament is a legal declaration by which a person, called the testator, names one or more persons (beneficiaries) to manage her/his estate and provides for the distribution of her/his property at death.

 


Handy Tips:

A will can be made by anyone above 21 years of age in India.

A will can be made on a plain paper in India.

It is not legally necessary to make the will on stamp paper.

It is advisable to write your will in your own hand writing, as the same can be verified later in case of any doubts raised by relatives.

It might happen that according to the family structure and preferences, one might want to divide their wealth unequally or make a provision for a close friend or a faithful servant. This isn’t possible if they die without a will.

 

Even though the law related to Wills varies state to state, one rule holds true: if one doesn’t have a Last Will and Testament, the Government makes one for them. In India, in the absence of a Will (i.e. when a person dies intestate), the estates and assets of a person are devolved according to the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act.

 


Therefore, even though one might consider it morbid to think about death and make a Will, the importance of making one cannot be over-emphasized. The following are some essential reasons why one must make a Will in time:


FOR FAIR DISPOSAL OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY:  Making a Will allows a person to decide how and to whom his property will devolve. It is not necessary that a person would want every dependant of his to inherit the property equally. It is also not necessary that the entire property will be devolved to the next of kin. A Will helps clarifying the share of each person in the property after the death of the testator.


FOR DIVISION OF MOVABLE PROPERTY: A Will lets a person decide how the movable property, like jewellery, car, etc. will be divided amongst the family members. This reduces wasteful litigation as no one, apart from the beneficiaries stated in the Will, can raise false claims on such property.


TO PROTECT INTEREST IN BUSINESS: The testator, by the way of her/his Last Will ensures that the interests in business/company are passed on in a good way to the heirs and/or co-owners of the Company. In the absence of a Will, there may be series of cases against and on behalf of the legal heirs claiming shares in the business of the testator after her/his death.


TO PROVIDE FOR CHARITY: A Will lets a person leave the world knowing that s/he has done some good for mankind. Including a provision for charity in the Will ensures that the testator lives in the hearts of the people even after her/his death.


TO MAKE DIFFICULT TIMES LESS DIFFICULT: Death, as we know it, is painful to deal with as it is. The last thing the immediate family of the deceased wants to get into is a legal battle over the property of the deceased. A Will keeps the loved one from having to deal with bureaucracy and wasteful litigation in the time of sadness.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more