Skip to main content

Unauthorised Transaction from Bank Account: Here’s How to Get Your Money Back

 Gone are the days of paper currency, this new era of extreme globalization has seen the economy evolve to a cashless one, where one can carry out any kind of transaction through swiping ATM cards, mobile apps, and online banking. For instance, booking a movie/hotel/ flight ticket, paying for a cab, or even buying a phone or even a house has become extremely simple and convenient.


And since, paying for everything is just a click away every transaction has become riskier as no direct hand to hand transaction takes place resulting in unauthorized transactions.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


The common online financial frauds include:

Sharing your one-time password(OTP)

For a financial transaction, a one-time password (OTP) is required, which you receive on your registered mobile phone. Giving away your OTPs to people on calls or otherwise should always be avoided to decrease the risk of such a fraud. This is a crucial detail. Apart from this, photocopies of your identity proof like PAN card, Aadhar card should also not be shared. Another important aspect is social engineering in frauds which means influencing/ manipulating another person in such a manner to take out information that can be used to steal that person’s money.

 


ATM cloning

Nowadays, ATM cloning so common that it can be while you are using your ATM card for a transaction at an ATM or even while paying your bills.


Consult: Top Cyber Crime Lawyers in India

 


Hacking

In the present modern age of technology, hacking is the most convenient way of stealing money from someone, all a person needs to do is hack into a device preferably a mobile or a computer and steal private important information of your account.

 


Identity Theft

Another common fraud is identity theft where an imposter steals important information of another person thereby getting access to his account and spends the money accordingly.

 


Mobile fraud (smishing)

One type of mobile fraud is smishing (smishing), that uses text messages to fool you into sharing financial and personal information. The scam works when you receive a text message on your cell phone which creates a sense of urgency by telling you that your account has been suspended or locked for some reason by telling “due to unauthorized access, excessive unsuccessful attempts to gain access or other fraudulent activity.”


The message concludes by informing you that you can reactivate or unlock your account by:


Calling the phone number provided


Linking to the Internet site provided in the text message.


 


Phishing and fraudulent emails

Phishing is a type of online bluff, using emails sent to unaware users. It steals data such as card numbers, passwords or other personal account information by pretending as a lawful business in an email.

 


Malware and viruses

Fraudsters are becoming sophisticated in finding alternate ways to gain access to your personal and financial information online without you getting to know it. One of the most cunning methods is through the use of malware (unwanted email) which gets installed without your knowledge on the computer. This can happen when you go to certain websites, download videos or files, etc


Since thousands of people are duped by such fraudsters almost all the time, an immediate need was felt by the government to find a solution and find it sooner than ever. The setting up of a cyber-cell in almost every district of the country is one such initiative where the government now hires ethical hackers to tackle the menace.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue


Apart from this, the victim to avoid getting duped must be very careful while using online payment modes and must not disclose their personal information like email address, answers to their security questions, home address, date of birth and must never disclose the one time passwords while buying or selling online with anyone since, the fraudster might even claim to be a bank executive.

 


Who is responsible when?

In cases where the loss is due to negligence by the customer, such as where he has shared the payment credentials, the customer will bear the entire loss until he reports the unauthorized transaction to the bank immediately. Any loss after the reporting of the unauthorized transaction shall be borne by the bank. The bank may, at their discretion, choose to reimburse the loss even though it occurred due to the customer’s negligence. In cases where there is negligence or fraud on the part of the bank, the bank will be fully liable to cover the losses of the customer.


In cases of a third party breach where the deficiency lies neither with the bank nor with the customer but lies elsewhere in the system, and the customer reports the loss within a reasonable time, the bank will be fully liable as well.


However, if you are cheated by a fraudster a victim must not panic but, simply do a couple of things to avoid further loss by getting the card blocked and also, keeping in mind some very simple steps. For instance, you must undertake the following steps if you are a victim of card fraud.

 


The important things to keep in mind

Step-1: Notify the Bank ASAP

The victim must immediately report the crime to the bank, preferably within 3 working days so that the amount which the bank is liable to pay towards the loss incurred by the victim.


The following table shows the liability that you will have to bear according to the time taken to report the fraud-


Apart from this, the maximum amount that you are liable to pay in case liability is on you depends on the kind of account you hold-


Consult: Top Cyber Crime Lawyers in India


Maximum liability of a customer in case the customer reports the fraud in 4 to 7 days

 


Step-2: File a police complaint against the theft

In case the theft was made online, such as someone made an online transaction that led to your account being debited, file a complaint with your nearest Cyber Cell.


In case the theft was made through a physical instrument, such as your ATM card details, file a complaint with your nearest police station.


Apart from this, the government has set up a Helpline Number (8691960000) for registering the complaint. Also, the web-page for the same is sachet.rbi.org.in.


Above all, to avoid/ in case of such online frauds, certain duties of both the customer and the bank are:

 


Precautionary measures to be taken by the customer/ victim

To keep your personal details, such as account details, PIN numbers, passwords, DOB, home address, security questions etc. secure and do not share them with anyone.


To keep a close track of the transactions that are carried out using your account. Every time you make a transaction, you must be proactive. Moreover, you should immediately report any suspicious activity to the bank.


In case you become a victim of theft, report the details of the transactions to the bank and immediately, file a complaint with the relevant police station as well.


Avoid making your DOB as your pin/ password, it makes it easier for any person to misuse it.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


Precautionary measures to be taken by the Bank

On receipt of the report of a fraud from the customer, banks must take immediate steps to prevent further fraud in the account. To facilitate this, banks are required to provide customers with 24x7 accesses to the bank through multiple channels such as phone banking, SMS, e-mail, IVR etc. Customers should be able to report any suspicious activity to the bank immediately.


The fraud reporting system is also to ensure that an immediate response is sent to the customers acknowledging the complaint along with the registered complaint number.


Banks must resolve the instance of fraud within 90 days from the reporting of the fraud.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree