Skip to main content

Order 17 CPC - Code of Civil Procedure - ADJOURNMENTS

 Order 17 CPC Description



1. Court may grant time and adjourn hearing


1[(1) The Court may, if sufficient cause is shown, at any stage of the suit grant time to the parties or to any of them, and may from time to time adjourn the hearing of the suit for reasons to be recorded in writing:


Provided that no such adjournment shall be granted more than three times to a party during hearing of the suit.]


(2) Costs of adjournment-In every such case the Court shall fix a day for the further hearing of the suit and 2[shall make such Orders as to costs occassioned by the adjournment or such higher costs as the court deems fit]:


3[Provided that,-


(a) when the hearing of the suit has commenced, it shall be continued from day-to-day unti 1 all the witnesses in attendance have been examined, unless the Court finds that, for the exceptional reasons to be recorded by it, the adjournment of the hearing beyond the following day is necessary.


(b) no adjournment shall be granted at the request of a party, except where the circumstances are beyond the control of that party.


(c) the fact that the pleader of a party is engaged in another Court, shall not be a ground for adjournment.


(d) where the illness of a pleader or his inability to conduct the case for any reason, other than his being engaged in another Court, is put forward as a ground for adjournment, the Court shall not grant the adjournment unless it is satisfied that the party applying for adjournment could not have engaged another pleader in time.


(e) where a witness is present in Court but a party or his pleader is not present or the party or his pleader, though present in Court, is not ready to examine or cross-examine the witness, the Court may, if it thinks fit, record the statement of the witness and pass such Orders as it thinks fit dispensing with the examination-in-chief or cross-examination of the witness, as the case may be, by the party or his pleader not present or not ready as aforesaid.]


HIGH COURT AMENDMENTS


Bombay.-


In Order XVII, in rule 1, in sub-rule (2), after the words "costs occasioned by the adjournment", insert the words "ordinarily not exceeding fifty rupees in ordinary suits and one hundred rupees in special suit", (w.e.f. 1-11-1966)


Delhi.-


Same as in Punjab.


Gujarat-


In Order XVII, in rule 1, in sub-rule (2), insert the words as in Bombay substituting "thirty" and "forty-five" for "fifty" and "one hundred" respectively.


Himachal Pradesh.-


Same as in Punjab.


Punjab.-


In Order XVII, in rule 1, in sub-rule (1),-


(i) at the beginning, insert the following words, namely:-


"Subject to the provisions of Order XXIII, rule 3".


(ii) after sub-rule (2), insert the following sub-rule, namely:-


"(3) where sufficient cause is not shown for the grant of an adjournment under sub-rule (1) the Court shall proceed with the suit forthwith."


[Vide Notification No. 95-G, dated 26th February, 1925 and Notification No. 211-R/ XI-Y-22, dated 21st July, 1937.]


1. Subs, by Act No. 46 of 1999, section 26 (w.e.f 1-7-2002).


2. Subs. Act No. 46 of 1999, section 26 for certain words (w.e.f 1-7-2002).


3.Subs, by Act No. 104 of 1976, for the previous proviso (w.e.f. 1-2-1977)


2. Procedure if parties fail to appear on day fixed


Where, on any day to which the hearing of the suit is adjourned, the parties or any of them fail to appear, the Court may proceed to dispose of the suit in one of the modes directed in that behalf by Order IX or make such other Order as it thinks fit.


1[Explanation.-Where the evidence or a substantial portion of the evidence of any party has already been recorded and such party fails to appear on any day to which the hearing of the suit is adjourned, the Court may, in its discretion, proceed with the case as if such party were present.]


HIGH COURT AMENDMENTS


Allahabad.-


In Order XVII, in rule 2, insert the following, namely:-


"Where the evidence, or a substantial portion of the evidence, of any party has already been recorded, and such party fails to appear on such day, the Court may in its discretion proceed with the case as if such party were present, and may dispose of it on the merits.


Explanation.-No party shall be deemed to have failed to appear if he is either present or is represented in Court by an agent or pleader, though engaged only for the purpose of making an application." (w.e.f. 28-5-1943}


[Ed.-This amendment relates to rule 2 prior to its amendment made by the Central Act 104 of 1976, sec. 68 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).]


Andhra Pradesh.-


In Order XVII, in rule 2, insert the following Explanation, namely:-


"Explanation.-The mere presence in Court of a party or his counsel not duly instructed shall not be considered to be an appearance of the party within the meaning of this rule." (w.e.f. 27-4-1961)


[Ed.-This amendment relates to rule 2 prior to its amendment made by the Central Act 104 of 1976, sec. 68 (w.e.f. 1-24977).]


1. Ins. by Act No. 104 of 1976 (w.e.f.1-2-1977).


3. Court may proceed notwithstanding either party fails to produce evidence, etc.


Where any party to a suit to whom time has been granted fails to produce his evidence, or to cause the attendance of his witnesses, or to perform any other act necessary to the further progress of the suit, for which time has been allowed, 1[the Court may, notwithstanding such default,-


(a) if the parties are present, proceed to decide the suit forthwith, or


(b) if the parties are, or any of them is, absent, proceed under rule 2].


HIGH COURT AMENDMENTS


Allahabad.-


In Order XVII, in rule 3, put a comma after the first word "where" and insert thereafter the words "in a case to which rule 2 does not apply", {w.e.f. 17-1-1953)


Andhra Pradesh.-


In Order XVII, in rule 3, insert the following proviso, namely:-


"Provided that in a case where there is default under this rule as well as default of appearance under rule 2 the Court will proceed under rule 2." (w.e.f. 27-4-1961)


1 Subs, by Act No. 104 of 1976 for certain words (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree