Skip to main content

Order 26 CPC - Code of Civil Procedure - COMMISSIONS

 Order 26 CPC Description

Commissions to examine witnesses


1. Cases in which Court may issue commission to examine witness


Any Court may in any suit issue a commission for the examination on interrogatories or otherwise of any person resident within the local limits of its jurisdiction who is exempted under this Code from attending the Court or who is from sickness or infirmity unable to attend it:


1[Provided that a commission for examination on interrogatories shall not be issued unless the Court, for reasons to be recorded, thinks it necessary so to do.


Explanation-The Court may, for the purpose of this rule, accept a certificate purporting to be signed by a registered medical practitioner as evidence of the sickness or infertility of any person, without calling the medical practitioner as a witness.]


1. Ins, by Act No. 104 of 1976, sec. 75 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).


HIGH COURT AMENDMENT


Allahabad.-In Order XXVI, for rule 1, substitute the following rule, namely:-


"1. Commission to examine witness.-Any Court may, in any suit, if for the reasons to be recorded in writing, it thinks it necessary to do so in the interest of justice or expedition, issue a Commission for the examination of any person on interrogatories or otherwise."


[Vide Notification No, 504/XI1I-B-31, dated 22nd November, 1980.]


2. Order for commission


An Order for the issue of a commission for the examination of a witness may be made by the Court either of its own motion or on the application, supported by affidavit or otherwise, of any party to the suit or of the witness to be examined.


3. Where witness resides within Court's jurisdiction


A commission for the examination of a person who resides within the local limits of the jurisdiction of the Court issuing the same may be issued to any person whom the Court thinks fit to execute it.


HIGH COURT AMENDMENT


Allahabad.-In Order XXVI, for rule 3, substitute the following rule, namely:-


"3. Commission to whom issued.-Such commission may be issued to any Court not being a High Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction such person resides or to any pleader or other person whom the Court thinks fit to execute it and the Court shall direct whether the commission shall be returned to itself or to any subordinate Court." (w.e.f. 22-11-1980)


4. Persons for whose examination commission may issue


(1) Any Court may in any suit issue a commission 1[for the examination on interrogatories or otherwise of-]


(a) any person resident beyond the local limits of its jurisdiction;


(b) any person who is about to leave such limits before the date on which he is required to be examined in Court; and


(c) 2[any person in the service of the Government] who cannot in the opinion of the Court, attend without detriment to the public service:


3[Provided that where, under rule 19 of Order XVI, a person cannot be Ordered to attend a Court in person, a commission shall be issued for his examination if his evidence is considered necessary in the interests of justice:


Provided further that a commission for examination of such person on interrogatories shall not be issued unless the Court, for reasons to be recorded, thinks it necessary so to do.]


(2) Such commission may be issued to any Court, not being a High Court, within the local limits of whose jurisdiction such person resides, or to any pleader or other person whom the Court issuing the commission may appoint.


(3) The Court on issuing any commission may this rule shall direct whether the commission shall be returned to itself or to any subordinate Court.


1. Subs, by Act No. 104 of 1976, sec. 75, for "for the examination of (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).


2. Subs. by A.O. 1937, for "any civil or military officer of the Government."


3. Ins. by Act No. 104 of 1976, sec. 75 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).


HIGH COURT AMENDMENTS


Allahabad,-In Order XXVI, omit rule'4. (w.e.f. 18-9-1980)


Madhya Pradesh.-In Order XXVI, in rule 4, in sub-rule (1), after clause (c), insert the following clause, namely:-


"(d) any person who by reason of anything connected with the war cannot conveniently be spared."


[Vide Notification No. 3409, dated 26th June, 1943.]


Rajasthan.-In Order XXVI, after rule 4, insert the following rule, namely:-


"4A. Commission for examination of any person resident with Court's local limits.- (I) Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules, any Court may, in the interests of justice or for the expeditious disposal of the case or for any other reason, issue commission in any suit for the examination, on interrogatories or otherwise of any person resident within the local limits of its jurisdiction and the evidence so recorded shall be read in evidence.


(2) The provisions of sub-rule (1) shall apply to proceedings in execution of a decree or Order."


[Vide Rajasthan Gazette, Extra, Ft, IV (Ga), Sec. 2, dated 1st December, 1973.]


1[4A. Commission for examination of any person resident within the local BE limits of the jurisdiction of the Court


Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules, any court may, in the interest of justice or for the expeditious disposal of the case or for any other reason, issue commission in any suit for the examination, on interrogatories or otherwise, of any person resident within the local limits of its jurisdiction, and the evidence so recorded shall be read in evidence.]


1. Ins. by Act No. 46 of 1999 section 29 (w.e.f.. 1-7-2002)


5. Commission or request to examine witness not within India


Where any Court to which application is made for the issue of a commission for the examination B of a person residing at any place not within India is satisfied that the evidence of such person is necessary, the Court may issue such commission or a letter of request.


6. Court to examine witness pursuant to Commission


Every Court receiving a commission for the examination of any person shall examine him or cause him to be examined pursuant thereto.


7. Return of commission with depositions of witnesses


Where a commission has been duly executed, it shall be returned, together with the evidence taken under it, to the Court from which it was issued, unless the Order for issuing the commission has otherwise directed, in which case the commission shall be returned in terms of such Order; and the commission and the returned thereto and the evidence taken under it shall 1[subject to the provisions of rule 8] from part of the record of the suit.


1. Subs, by Act No. 104 of 1976, sec. 75, for "subject to the provisions of the next following rule)" (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).


HIGH COURT AMENDMENT


Allahabad.-In Order XXVI, in rule 7, omit the words "subject to the provision of rule 8" and at the end, insert the words "shall be read as evidence in the suit", (w.e.f. 22-11-1980)


8. When depositions may be read in evidence


Evidence taken under a commission shall not be read as evidence in the suit without the consent of the party against whom the same is offered, unless-


(a) the person who gave the evidence is beyond the jurisdiction of the Court, or dead or unable from sickness or infermity to attend to be personally examined, or exempted from personal appearance in Court or is a person in the service of the Government who cannot, in the opinion of the Court, attend without detriment to the public service, or


(b) the Court in its discretion dispenses with the proof of any of the circumstances mentioned in clause (a) and authorizes the evidence of any person being read as evidence in the suit, notwithstanding proof that the cause for taking such evidence by commission has ceased at the time of reading the same.


HIGH COURT AMENDMENT


Allahabad,-In Order XXVI, omit rule 8. (w.e.f. 22-11-1980)


Commissions for local investigations


9. Commissions to make local investigations


In any suit in which the Court deems a local investigation to be requisite or proper for the purpose of elecidating any matter in dispute, or of ascertaining the market-value of any property, or the amount of any mesne profits or damages or annual net profits, the Court may issue a commission to such person as it thinks fit directing him to make such investigation and to report thereon to the Court:


Provided that, where the State Government has made rules as to the persons to whom such commission shall be issued, the Court shall be bound by such rules.


HIGH COURT AMENDMENTS


Calcutta.-In Order XXVI, in rule 9, omit the proviso.


[Vide Notification No. 11223-G, dated 7th April, 1933.]


Gauhati.-Same as in Calcutta.


10. Procedure of Commissioner


(1) The Commissioner, after such local inspection as he deems necessary and after reducing to writing the evidence taken by him, shall return such evidence, together with his report in writing signed by him, to the Court.


(2) Report and deposition to be evidence in suit. Commissioner may be examined in person-The report of the Commissioner and the evidence taken by him (but not the evidence without the report) shall be evidence in the suit and shall form part of the record; but the Court or, with the permission of the Court, any of the parties to suit may examine the Commissioner personally in open Court touching any part of the matters referred to him or mentioned in his report, or as to his report, or as to the manner in which he has made the investigation.


(3) Where the Court is for any reason dissatisfied with the proceedings of the Commissioner, it may direct such further inquiry to be made as it shall think fit.


1[Commissions for scientific investigation, performance of ministerial act and sale of movable property


1. Ins. by Act No. 104 of 1976 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).


10A. Commission for scientific investigation


(1) Where any question arising in a suit involves any scientific investigation which cannot, in the opinion of the Court, be conveniently conducted before the Court, the Court may, if it thinks it necessary or expedient in the interests of justice so to do, issue a commission to such person as it thinks fit, directing him to inquire into such question and report thereon to the Court.


(2) The provisions of rule 10 of the Order shall, as far as may be, apply in relation to a Commissioner appointed under this rule as they apply in relation to a Commissioner appointed under rule 9.


10B. Commission for performance of a ministerial act


(1) Where any question arising in a suit involves the performance of any ministerial act which cannot, in the opinion of the Court, be conveniently performed before the Court, the Court may, if, for reasons to be recorded, it is of opinion that it is necessary or expedient in the interests of justice so to do, issue a commission to such person as it thinks fit, directing him to perform that ministerial act and report thereon to the Court.


(2) The provisions of rule 10 of this Order shall apply in relation to a Commissioner appointed under this rule as they apply in relation to a Commissioner appointed under rule 9.


10C. Commission for the sale of movable property


(1) Where in any suit, it becomes necessary to sell any movable property which is in the custody of the Court pending the determination of the suit and which cannot be conveniently preserved, the Court may, if, for reasons to be recorded, it is of opinion that it is necessary or expedient in the interests of justice so to do, issue a commission to such -person as it thinks fit, directing him to conduct such sale and report thereon to the Court.


(2) The provisions of rule 10 of this Order shall apply in relation to a Commissioner appointed under this rule as they apply in relation to a Commissioner appointed under rule 9.


(3) Every such sale shall be held, as far as may be, in accordance with the procedure prescribed for the sale of movable property in execution of a decree.]


Commissions to examine accounts


11. Commission to examine or adjust accounts


In any suit in which an examination or adjustment of the accounts is necessary, the Court may issue a commission to such person as it thinks fit directing him to make such examination or adjustment.


12. Court to give Commissioner necessary instructions


(1) The Court shall furnish the Commissioner with such part of the proceedings and such instructions as appear necessary, and the instructions shall distinctly specify whether the Commissioner is merely to transmit the proceedings which he may hold on the inquiry, or also to report his own opinion on the point referred for his examination.


(2) Proceedings and report to be evidence. Court may direct further inquiry-The proceedings and report (if any) of the Commissioner shall be evidence in the suit, but where the Court has reason to be dissatisfied with them, it may direct such further inquiry as it shall think fit.


Commissions to make partitions


13. Commission to make partition of immovable property


Where a preliminary decree for partition has been passed, the Court may, in any case not provided for by section 54, issue a commission to such person as it thinks fit to make the partition or separation according to the rights as declared in such decree.


14. Procedure of Commissioner


(1) The Commissioner shall, after such inquiry as may be necessary, divide the property into as many shares as may be directly by the Order under which the commission was issued, and shall allot such shares to the parties, and may, if authorised thereto by the said Order, award sums to be paid for the purpose of equalizing the value of the shares.


(2) The commissioner shall then prepare and sign a report or the Commission (where the commission was issued to more than one person and they cannot agree) shall prepare and sign separate reports appointing the share of each party and distinguishing each share (if so directed by the said Order) by metes and bounds. Such report or reports shall be annexed to the commission and transmitted to Court; and the Court, after hearing any objections which the parties may make to the report or reports, shall confirm, vary or set aside the same.


(3) Where the Court confirms or varies the report or reports it shall pass a decree in accordance with the same as confirmed or varied; but where the Court sets aside the report or reports it shall either issue a new commission or make such other Order as it shall think fit.


HIGH COURT AMENDMENTS


Orissa and Patna.-In Order XXVI, in rule 14, for sub-rules (2) and (3), substitute the following sub-rules, namely:-


"(2) The Commissioner shall then prepare and sign a report or the commissioner (where the commission was issued to more than one person and they cannot agree) shall prepare and sign separate reports appointing the share of each party and distinguishing each share (if necessary) by metes and bounds. The Commissioner or Commissioners shall append to the report or where there is more than one to each report a schedule showing the plots and areas allotted to each party and also unless otherwise directed by the Court, a map showing in different colours the plots or portions of plots allotted to each party. In the event of a plot being sub-divided the area of each sub-plot shall be given in the schedule and also measurements showing how the plot is to be divided. Such report or reports with the schedule and map, if any, shall be annexed to the commission and transmitted to the Court and the Court after hearing any objections which the parties may make to the report or reports shall confirm, vary or set aside the same.


(3) Where the Court confirms or varies the report or reports it shall pass a decree in accordance with the same as confirmed or varied and when drawing up the final decree shall incorporate in its decree the schedule and the map, if any, mentioned in sub-rule (2) above, as confirmed or varied by the Court. The whole report or reports of the Commissioner or Commissioners shall not ordinarily be entered in the decree. Where the Court sets aside the report or reports it shall either issue a new commission or make such other Order as it shall think fit." (w.e.f. 4-3-1932)


General provisions


15. Expenses of commission to be paid into Court


Before issuing any commission under this Order, the Court may Order such sum (if any) as it thinks reasonable for the expenses of the commission to be, within a time to be fixed, paid into Court by the party at whose instance or for whose benefit the commission is issued.


HIGH COURT AMENDMENTS


Andhra Pradesh.-Same as in Madras.


Karnataka.-Same as in Madras with substitution of the words "any of the Courts mentioned in clause (c) of section 78 of this Code" for the words "foreign Courts under the provisions of section 78".


Kerala.-Same as in Madras.


[Vide Notification No. BI-3312/5S, dated 7th April, 1959.]


Madras.-In Order XXVI,-


(i) renumber rule 15 as sub-rule (1) thereof;


(ii) after sub-rule (1) as so renumbered, insert the following sub-rule, namely:-


"(2) Before executing and returning any commission issued by foreign Courts under the provisions of section 78 the Court or the Commissioner required to execute the commission may levy such fees as the High Court may from time to time prescribe in this behalf in addition to the fees prescribed for the issue of summons to witnesses and for expenses of such witnesses under rule 2 of Order XVI."


Orissa.-In Order XXVI, in rule 15, at the end, insert the words "any after the issue of such omission may Order such further sums to be paid into Court from time to time by either party as the Court may consider necessary".


[Vide Notification No. 24-X-7-52, dated 30th March, 1954.]


16. Powers of Commissioners


Any Commissioner appointed under this Order may, unless otherwise directed by the Order of appointment,-


(a) examine the parties themselves and any witness whom they or any of them may produce, and any other person whom the Commissioner thinks proper to call upon to give evidence in the matter referred to him;


(b) call for and examine documents and other things relevant to the subject of inquiry;


(c) at any reasonable time enter upon or into any land or building mentioned in the Order.


1[16A. Questions objected to before the Commissioner


(1) Where any question put to a witness is objected to by a party or his pleader in proceedings before a Commissioner appointed under this Order, the Commissioner shall take down the question, the answer, the objections and the name of the party or, as the case may be, the pleader so objecting:


Provided that the Commissioner shall not take down the answer to a question which is objected to on the ground of privilege but may continue with the examination of the witness, leaving the party to get the question of privilege decided by the Court, and, where the Court decides that there is no question of privilege, the witness may be recalled by the Commissioner and examined by him or the witness may be examined by the Court with regard to the question which was objected to on the gtound of privilege.


(2) No answer taken down under sub-rule (1) shall be read was evidence in the suit except by the Order of the Court.]


1. Ins. by Act No. 104 of 1976, sec. 75 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).


17. Attendance and examination of witnesses before Commissioner


(1) The provisions of this Code relating to the summoning, attendance and examination of witnesses, and to the remuneration of, and penalties to be imposed upon, witnesses, shall apply to persons required to give evidence or to produce documents under this Order whether the commission in execution of which they are so required has been issued by a Court situate within or by a Court situate beyond the limits of 1[India], and for the purposes of this rule the Commissioner shall be deemed to be a Civil Court:


2[Provided that when the Commissioner is not a Judge of a Civil Court he shall not be competent to impose penalties; but such penalties may be imposed on the application of such Commissioner by the Court by which the commission was issued.]


(2) A Commissioner may apply to any Court (not being a High Court) within the local limits on whose jurisdiction a witness resides for the issue of any process which he may find it necessary to issue to or against such witness, and such Court may, in its discretion, issue such process as it considers reasonable and proper.


1. Subs. by Act 2 of 1951, sec. 3, for "the States".


2. Ins. by Act No. 104 of 1976, sec. 75, (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).


18. Parties to appear before Commissioner


(1) Where a commission is issued under this Order, the Court shall direct that the parties to the suit shall appear before the Commissioner in person or by their agents or pleaders.


(2) Where all or any of the parties do not so appear, the Commissioner may proceed in their absence.


HIGH COURT AMENDMENTS


Allahabad.-In Order XXVI, in rule 18, in sub-rule (1), after the words "agents or pleaders", substitute a comma for the full stop and insert the words "and shall direct the party applying for the examination of the witness or in the discretion any other party to the suit, to supply the Commissioner with a copy of the pleadings and issues."


[Vide Notification No. 4084/35 (a)-3(7), dated 24th July, 1926.]


Orissa.-Same as in Allahabad, (w.e.f. 29-12-1961)


1[18A. Application of Order to execution proceedings-


The provisions of this Order shall apply so far as may be, to proceedings in execution of a decree or Order.


1. Ins. by Act No. 104 of 1976, sec. 75 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).


18B. Court to fix a time for return of commission


The Court issuing a commission shall fix a date on or before which the commission shall be returned to it after execution, and the date so fixed shall not be extended except where the Court, for reasons to be recorded, is satisfied that there is sufficient cause for extending the date.]


Commissions issued at the instance of foreign Tribunals


19. Cases in which High Court may issue commission to examine witness-


(1) If a High Court is satisfied-


(a) that a foreign court situated in a foreign country wishes to obtain the evidence of a witness in any proceeding before it,


(b) that the proceeding is of a civil nature, and


(c) that the witness is residing within the limits of the High Court's appellate jurisdiction,


it may, subject to the provisions of the rule 20, issue a commission for the examination of such witness.


(2) Evidence may be given of the matters specified in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of sub-rule (1)-


(a) by a certificate signed by the consular officer of the foreign country of the highest rank in India and transmitted to the High Court through the Central Government, or


(b) by a letter of request issued by the foreign Court and transmitted to the High Court through the Central Government, or


(c) by a letter of request issued by the foreign Court and produced before the High Court by a party to the proceeding.


20. Application for issue of commission


The High Court may issue a commission under rule 19-


(a) upon application by a party to the proceeding before the foreign Court, or


(b) upon an application by a law officer of the State Government acting under instructions from the State Government.


21. To whom commission may be issued


A commission under rule 19 may be issued to any Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the witness resides, or the witness resides within the local limits of the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of the High Court to any person whom the Court thinks fit to execute the commission.


HIGH COURT AMENDMENT


Kerala.-In Order XXVI, for rule 21, substitute the following rule, namely:-


"21. To whom Commission may be issued.-A commission under rule 19 may be issued to any Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the witness resides, or to any person whom the Court thinks fit to execute the commission." (w.e.f. 9-6-1959).


22. Issue, execution and return of commissions, and transmission of evidence to foreign Court


The provisions of rules 6, 15 1[Sub-rule (1) of rule 16A, 17, 18 and 18B] of this Order in so far as they are applicable shall apply to the issue, execution and return of such commissions, and when any such commission has been duly executed it shall be returned, together with the evidence taken under it, to the High Court, which shall forward it to the Central Government, along with the letter of request for transmission to the foreign court.]


1. Subs, by Act No. 104 of 1976, for "16, 17 and 18" (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).


HIGH COURT AMENDMENTS


Andhra Pradesh.-Same as in Madras.


Karnataka.-In Order XXVI, after rule 22, insert the following rules, namely:-


"23. (1} The Court may in any suit issue a commission to such person or persons as it thinks fit to translate accounts and documents which are not in the language of the Court.


(2) Before issuing such a commission the Court may Order such sum, if any, as it thinks reasonable for the expenses of the commission to be paid into Court by the party at whose instance or for whose benefit the commission has been issued within such time as may be fixed by the Court.


(3) The report of the Commissioner shall be evidence in the suit and shall form part of the record.


(4) Where however a translation as required by rule 12 of Order XII of this Code has already been filed into Court, no further commission under this rule need be issued.


(5) A translation submitted by the Commissioner or Commissioners under this rule shall be verified in the manner prescribed in rule 12 of Order XIII of this Code.


24. The provisions of this Order shall apply so far as may be, to proceedings in execution of decree or Order. Verified in the manner prescribed in rule 12 of Order XIII of this Code." (w.e.f. 30-3-1967)


Kerala.-Same as in Madras.


[Vide Notification No. BI-3312/5S, dated 9th June, 1959.]


Madras.-In Order XXVI,-


(a) after rule 22, insert the following rule, namely:-


"23. Application of Order to execution proceedings.-The provisions of this Order and of Order XXVIA shall apply, so for as may be, to proceedings in execution of a decree or Order." (w.e.f. 9-6-1923)


(b) after Order XXVI, insert the following Order, namely:-


Order XXVI A


1. The Court may in any suit issue a commission to such person as it thinks fit to translate accounts and other documents which are not in the language of the Court.


2. The report of the Commissioner shall be evidence in the suit and shall form part of the record.


3. Before issuing any-commission under this Order, the Court may Order such sum


(if any) as it thinks reasonable for the expense of the commission to be, within a time to be fixed, paid in the Court by the party at whose instance or for whose benefit the commission is issued."


Orissa.-In Order XXVI -


(a) after rule 22, insert the following rules, namely:


"23. (i) The Court may in any suit issue a commission to such persons as it thinks fit to translate accounts or other documents which are not in Court language or to inspect documents for purposes to be specified in the Order appointing such Commissioner.


(ii) The report of the Commissioner shall be evidence in the suit and shall form part of the record.


(iii) Before issuing any commission under this Order, the Court may Order such sum (if any) as it thinks reasonable for the expense of the commission to be, within a time to be fixed, paid in the Court by the party at whose instance or for whose benefit the commission is issued."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree