Skip to main content

Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems - Manav Puri@LexCliq

                    Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems


Introduction;

The legal system is made up of set of rules, regulations, processes, and various legal institutions by which the public initiatives and private aspirations which can be carried out through legal ways. In other words, it is a system for elucidating and enforcing the laws as well as the rights and responsibilities in a variety of ways. Every legal system in this world can be broadly classified into two types – The Adversarial and Inquisitorial, where both systems have the prime objective of dispensing justice, however, they differ in their techniques for adjudication and justice delivery. 


Classification;

  1. Adversarial System – The parties in the legal proceedings not only prepare their own theories for the case but they also gather evidences to support their arguments. The parties are supported by their lawyers, who play a vital role in dispensing justice to their clients. The lawyers may even gather evidences and be a part of the cross-examination, and when the bunch of evidences are presented by the other party in dispute. The role of the judge or the decision maker is passive as the judge pronounces the judgement based only on the evidences and arguments that are presented by the parties and their lawyers.

Example - The adversarial system is generally practied in common law countries, which are UK, U.S, Australia and India.


Advantages of Adversarial System; 

  • The process of cross-examination is very useful and the best way to test the righteousness of the witnesses presented.

  • The parties will be more satisfied to accept the final judgement, as they have an effective role to play.

Disadvantages of Adversarial System;

  • The cost of getting justice falls upon the parties, that can give rise to the sense of discrimination amongst them. Parties with better resources are able to get justice by hiring more experienced lawyers and by presenting complex evidences which the other party my lack. Accessibility and affordability to these resources of justice are important challenges for the adversarial system of dispute resolution.

  •  The role of lawyers, and the formalities, may delay the trials to reach to its end.

  • Judges play a less active role in this type of dispute resolution, as he is not duty bound to determine the truth by his personal views, but by the evidences and arguments that were presented in front of him.



  1. Inquisitorial System – In an inquisitorial system, the judge/decision maker takes a center play or plays a crucial role in dispensing justice. The role of the decision maker is of determining the facts and issues being part of the dispute. The judge/decision maker also decides the ways in which the evidence must be produced prior to the court. The judge after facts being presented in front of him, he then determines the evidences produced before him and decides upon the right claims. This model of adjudication or dispute settlement is also known as interventionist or an investigative model. Furthermore, in this type of system, less dependency is shown on cross-examination and other techniques or formalities that the lawyers often use to evaluate the evidences of their opposing counsel.

Example – The Continental Europe, following the civil law system has adopted the inquisitorial system of Dispute Resolution.




Advantages of the Inquisitorial System;

  • This type offers procedural efficiency as the active role of judges tends to avoid the delayed and prolonged trials, resulting in speedy delivery of justice.

  • This type of system protects and ensures equality between the parties as even, the party with better resources and expert lawyers will not be able to change the thoughts of the judges.


Disadvantages of the Inquisitorial System;

  • In this system, since the judge steps acts as an investigator, he cannot be neutral while studying and judging the case, and has to determine the case with an open mind. 

  • There may be situations where the judge might be unjust or unfair with his judgements, due to lack of important structures and methods for fact finding and analyzing.


Conclusion;

We can say that the inquisitorial system can be understood as an official investigation for determining truth, whereas the adversarial system is based on the principle of competitive process, between the prosecution and defence to determine the facts of the dispute. The inquisitorial process on one hand, grants more power to the judge to oversee the case, whereas on the other hand the judge in the adversarial system, plays a role of an arbiter between prosecution and defence. Despite, having differences between them it has always been successful in balancing the interests, needs and expectations of the State in understanding and judging the offenders with, the interests of the citizens who may be caught up by the legal processes.


Written By – Manav Puri@LexCliq
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more