Skip to main content

Appeal and Revision under Criminal Procedure Code

               Appeal and Revision under Criminal Procedure Code 

Appeal: -

It is a major part of Indian legal system or criminal law. If anyone is not satisfied with any ruling on those men he can file a petition in the form of appeal in the higher forum or higher court. There is some particular matter in which an apple cannot be filed, like- 

  • If that used person pleads guilty and convicted by the High Court or by the court of session or by any judicial magistrate under section 372 of criminal procedure code.

  •  If a first class magistrate imposes a fine not more than rupees 100 under section 376 in summary trial.  if the fine does not exit our cross rupees 200.

  •  If learning High Court awards and imprisonment of not more than six months and also imposes fine not more than rupees 1000.

apart from that in some other matters appeal is not allowed.  They are as follows- 

  • If there is a default of payment of fine,  which is included in the sentence or punishment .

  • If the person is convicted to furnish or to submit insecurity to maintain peace in the area under section 107 and 144 of the criminal procedure code.

apple in the matter of conviction under section 374 (1) If any person is convicted on trial by High Court then he can file apple to the Supreme Court.  Similarly,  under section 374 (2) If anyone is convicted by the sessions judge for additional sessions judge an apple before the learning High Court can we filed. No appeal will be entertained if the accused pleads guilty himself.

Under section 397 of Criminal Procedure Code, there is a scope of revisional jurisdiction by which a superior Court can perform its supervisory Jurisdiction. The main object is to correct miscarriage of justice in the matter of misconception of law, irregularity of Procedure, neglect of proper precaution, resulting some injury in the maintenance of Law and order.

By this provision of revisional jurisdiction superior courts can call records from inferior courts,  lake High Court Alsatian justice court can call from its subordinate court.

High Court’s power of revision:

Under section 401 High Court enjoy the power of revisional jurisdiction, like in the matter of- 

  • Enhancing the sentencing.

  • Suspension of a sentence which is providing in an appeal.

  • Releasing an appellant on bail.

  • Taking cognizance of further evidence which is directly associated with the matter.

  • Tendering an order of pardon.

  • An appealed Court can acquit or discharge the accused after conducting further inquiry retail or commitment.

Session’s judges power of revision:

The Session Judges may exercise all the powers which are prescribed all objectives to stop multiplicity of proceeding. it makes final decision in a revision application to a person and stops him to file further proceedings by the way of revision to the High Court if necessary.

If any application for revision is filed before the session judge then his decision Will be entertained by the High Court or any other court. The High Court or session judge may direct the chief judicial magistrate or any subordinate magistrate to make further inquiry in two any complaint which is dismissed under section 203 of criminal procedure code.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more