Skip to main content

Basic Structure Doctrine

 Basic Structure of the constitution

By Shreya Verma

Basic Structure of anything is its core around which that whole thing has been structured. With respect to the constitution of India, the concept evolved in 1970’s and 80’s and has not been fully evolved yet. The concept of basic structure has not been defined anywhere in the constitution. It was first noted by the hon’ble Supreme court in the landmark judgement-H.H. Keshavananda Bharti Sripad Galvaru vs. State of Kerala (1973) SC. That whole of the Constitution can be amended except for its basic structure. The court also noted in the said case that it is impossible to define as to what all can be said to be the basic structure and it is to be decided by the court as and when a case is brought before it. However, it laid down some of the key features of the constitution which can be termed to be its basic structure like

 ->the unity and sovereignty of India

 ->democratic and Republic form of government 

->federal character of the Constitution 

->Supremacy of the Constitution 

->secular character of the Constitution 

->separation of power 

->individual freedom 

->fundamental right to life and personal liberty 

The doctrine of basic structure forms the substantive restrictions upon the parliament's power to amend. Indian Constitution being a flexible one, allows amendments and since its formation, it has been amended over a hundred times in a period of seven decades.

Also, in M. Nagaraj vs. Union of India (2006) SC the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the concept of basic structure is about the theory of overarching principles, which are, certain systematic principles that cut across the entire constitution and which provide coherence to the constitution. The court also gave the 'essence of right test' that deals with finding out the essence behind the formation of an act or rule for example essence of having the fundamental right of equality in constitution is ‘socialism’, which is one of the basic structures or core principles of the constitution .

After Kesavananda Bharti Judgment, the scope of basic structure was extensive expanded in the cases like in Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain case (1975), Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980), S.R. Bommai v Union of India (1994) I.R. Coelho vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2007). Recently, the principle was invoked when in 2015 when the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) was declared to be null and void as against the basic principle of judicial overreach. Also, the protests against CAA as against right to equality, Right to equality and liberty based verdicts like Sabrimala case, or Navtej Singh Johar case all are examples as to how basic structure doctrine has helped in protecting the constitution from losing its essence.

Some of the other principles which can be considered to be the basic structure are- Rule of law Supremacy of the constitution, separation of power, free and fair elections, powers of high court under article 226 and 227, limited power of Parliament to amend the constitution the trinity of liberty, equality and fraternity, socialism, secularism and so on. The list is not exhaustive as has been noted by the apex court. The reason behind the principle being to protect the sanctity of the constitution. This guard of basic structure as laid down by the judiciary has helped to protect the essence of the constitution from the hands of the legislature. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more