Skip to main content

DOCTRINE OF TERRITORIAL NEXUS

 DOCTRINE OF TERRITORIAL NEXUS

  • What is the Doctrine of Territorial Nexus?

The Doctrine of territorial nexus states that legal guidelines made via way of means of the country legislature aren't relevant out of doors to the country. It is the handiest relevant while there's enough nexus among the country and the item. 

  • It is invoked all through the subsequent instances.

  • Whether a selected country has an extra-territorial operation. 

 If there's a territorial nexus among the subject- count the number of the Act and the country making the regulation.

The Doctrine of Territorial Nexus means that the item to which the regulation applies want now no longer be bodily placed withinside the territorial barriers of the country. Instead, it has to have enough territorial reference to the country.

The country can levy a tax at the person, item, or any transaction now no longer handiest while its miles located inside its territorial limits, however additionally while it has enough and actual territorial reference to it. 


  • The function of territorial nexus in Indian Legislation

Article 245 of the Indian charter states the volume to which the legislative powers are conferred in parliament and the country legislature as a way to make legal guidelines with appreciation to the territory. Parliament has the energy to make legal guidelines for the for which it has jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of parliament extends to the entire or any part of India. They also can be enacted via way of means of the parliament for extraterritorial operations if there's enough nexus of the regulation with India. These legal guidelines can't be wondered or held invalidated. However, all of the legal guidelines should follow the provisions of the Indian charter. 

The powers conferred in parliament aren't absolute. Laws made via way of means of the parliament for Extraterritorial operations are for the motive of working out of doors the geographical limits of India. The country legislature doesn`t have the energy to make legal guidelines for extraterritorial operations. However, this problem of the country legislature is subjected to 1 exception and this is territorial nexus. If its miles set up that there's enough reference to the item the legal guidelines enacted via way of means of the country legislature could have an impact out of doors the territorial limits of the country.

The following situations are required as a way to invoke the jurisdiction of territorial nexus-

  • If there exist extraterritorial operations in a country

  • If there's valid nexus between the item and the country. It has to be clear that the item will be located out of doors the territorial limits of the country however it should have a territorial reference to the country. 


State of Bombay vs R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala

In the spontaneous case, the respondent who turned into now no longer a resident of Bombay carried out a prize opposition of a crossword puzzle via a newspaper that turned into published and posted in Bangalore. This paper turned into broadly posted in Bombay too. For this opposition, depots have been set up in order that the paperwork and charges may be collected. It attracted plenty of customers for the price tag of that opposition.

The country authorities then levy take over the respondent’s organization for contesting a prize opposition withinside the country. The respondent challenged the ideal courtroom docket and a query turned into raised whether or not the tax may be levied upon someone who is living out of doors the territorial limits of the country. It turned into held via way of means of the ideal courtroom docket that there has been enough territorial nexus and the legislature has the authority to tax the respondent for the sales earned via way of means of his organization via the prize opposition. 


Tata Iron and Steel Company vs. Bihar State Tax Act

The country of Bihar surpassed the income tax act for levying a tax on the income whether or not it happened withinside the territorial limits of the country or out of doors of that limit, it turned into additionally said that the products have to be synthetic withinside the country. In on the spontaneous case, it turned into held that there has been a long time nexus among the item which turned into to be taxed and the regulation. These are the 2 crucial factors that represent the doctrine of territorial nexus. 


  • Conclusion

It may be concluded that the legislative powers were allotted in folds among the middle and country. Federalism is a totally complicated mechanism all even though it's miles the very motive for which a federal country is shaped consists of the distribution of powers among the union and the middle. Their energy is partitioned via way of means of the charter in order that they have to their independence over the government and legislative authority. 

As our charter is of federal shape it establishes twin polity among the union and country. Parliament has the energy to make legal guidelines for any or entire part of India, in addition, to confer with the energy to make legal guidelines for extraterritorial operations. however, a country legislature isn't always capable sufficient to make legal guidelines for extraterritorial operations. However, there's one exception that allows the country legislature to make legal guidelines for extraterritorial functions if there exists enough connection between the item and the country. Its manner that the item will be placed out of doors the territorial limits of the country and has a territorial reference to the country. The scope of the territorial nexus is huge and may be carried out of doors the territorial limits of India. The doctrine of territorial nexus lets in the impact of regulation out the territorial limits of a nation.


 


Written by Parul Sharma


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree