Skip to main content

dowry prohibition act 1961

         Dowry Prohibition Act 1961

Section 2- Definition of Dowry

Dowry means any property or valuable security given or agreed to be given either directly or indirectly by one party of the marriage to the other party or by parents of either party to the marriage, to the parents of the other party, at the time of marriage before or after marriage, in connection with marriage of the said parties, but it does not include dower as specified in the Muslim personal law.


Section 3 - Penalty for giving or taking dowry                                                                                       

Subsection (1)- after the enactment of this act, if any person gives or takes or helps in giving or taking dowry, he shall be punishable with imprisonment of not less than 5 years, and with fine which shall not be less than Rs.15000 or the amount of the value of dowry whichever is more. 

However, the court may for some special reasons in writing, may impose imprisonment for a term less than 5 years.

Subsection (2) states that the provisions of subsection (1) shall not apply in relation to presents which are given at the time of marriage to the bride and the groom, without any demand being made. However, a list of such presents should be maintained, as per the provisions of this act. Moreover, if any presents are made by or on behalf of the bride or any other person related to the bride, and if such presents are of customary nature and the value is not excessive having regard to the financial status of the person who is making such presents then such presents are allowed.


Section 4: Penalty for demanding dowry 

If any person directly or indirectly demands from the parents or other relatives or guardian of the bride, any dowry, he shall be punishable with imprisonment which shall not be less than 6 months but which may extend to 2 years and with fine amount which may extend to rupees 10,000. 

However, the court may for reasons to be recorded in writing impose a punishment for a term less than 6 months.


Section 4(A) Ban on advertisement 

If any person makes an offer through any advertisement in a newspaper, periodical, journal or through any other media, any share in his property or money or both, as a consideration for the marriage of his son or daughter or any other relative, and gets such advertisement printed or publishes or circulates it, he shall be punishable with imprisonment of not less than six months but which may extend to five years or with a fine amount which may extend to rupees 5000. However, the court may for reasons to be recorded in writing impose a punishment for a term less than 6 months.


Section 6 Dowry for the benefit of the wife or her heirs

Subsection (1) states that if any dowry has been received by any person other than the woman, in connection with whose marriage the dowry is given, then that person should transfer it to the woman: 

  1. If the dowry was received before marriage, then within 3 months after the date of marriage or 

  2. If the dowry was received at the time of or after marriage, then within 3 months after the date of receiving it or

  3. If the dowry was received when the woman was minor, then within 3 months after she has attained the age of 18 years.

until such transfer is done, that other person should hold it as a trustee for the benefit of the woman.

Subsection (2) states that if any person fails to transfer the property within the stipulated time period, then he shall be punishable with imprisonment of not less than 6 months, but which may extend to 2 years, and with a fine amount which shall not be less than Rupees 5,000 but which may extend to rupees 10,000 or both. 

Subsection (3) states that if the woman dies before receiving the property the heirs of the woman shall be entitled to claim it from the person who is holding it for the time being. 


However, if such woman dies within 7 years of her marriage due to some unnatural causes, the property shall be transferred to her parents if she has no children or if she has children, the property shall be transferred to them. 

Subsection (3)A states that if that person is convicted before transferring the property, then the court shall in addition to awarding punishment, pass an order in writing that such person should transfer the property to the woman, her heirs, parents, or children within such period as specified in the order. If the person fails to follow the order, then the court may impose a fine amount which shall be equal to the value of the property, and it has to be paid either to the woman, her heirs, parents, or children.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree