Skip to main content

Drugs Addiction

 Drugs Addiction

By Nemi Bhavsar

Drugs addiction is the worst social evil of modern civilization. It is a major issue of today's generation and a serious problem all over the world. Drug addiction refers to consumption of harmful substances that affect a person's mental as well as physical health. It involves taking dangerous and excessive consumption of legal and illegal drugs, which leads to changes in person's behavior. It is a method of self-destruction. The misguided teenagers and frustrated adults are the prey of this habit. Drug addiction is a thought of fashion and modernization. The worst aspect of this social evil act is that if you start taking drug for fun or pleasure, than it starts becoming a habit of for day-to-day life. Drug abuse is now a social as well as cultural problem for today's generation as it has started polluting the minds and morals of youth.

Reasons For Drug Abuse:

There are several issues which raises the chances of addiction for regular and day to day consumption of drugs. But these reasons are all the result of some sort of emotional, psychological, physical factors that causes drug usage. Here are some other factors that leads to drugs usage:

  • Mental Illness:

Mental illness also known as "mental health disorders", refers to a wide range of mental health issues or conditions that affects mood, thinking and behavior of a person. Examples of mental illness includes depression, anxiety, eating orders , mood disorders, etc. and to get relief most of the people start using drugs.

 

  • Enjoyment:

Many people start using drugs for fun and enjoyment. The chemicals used in drugs gives a sensation of relaxation and pleasure, which boosts the metabolism and hormones for the body.

 

  • Pressure:

Many adults and teenagers start using drugs to get relief from workloads by their job places or by their education institutes. To feel more relaxed, self-confident and to boost their energy level for better performance, mostly people start taking drugs.

Signs And Symptoms Of Addiction:

Different drugs presents different types of symptoms and mind sensation which are stable according to chemicals used in those drugs. There are basically emotional, physical and behavioral signs and symptoms, which insist a person to take drugs. These are the warning signs:

Changes in personality.

Mood swings

Poor physical appearance

Sudden weight loss or gain

Craving for drugs

Types Of Drugs Used By People:

Many people use different types of drugs according to it's consumption and high frequency of the drug.


The following are many types of drugs that people usually abuse and they are:

Alcohol

Cocaine

Heroin

Opioids

Hallucinogens

Cannabis

Barbiturates

Caffeine

Bath salts

Amphetamines

How To Say No To Drugs???

There are multiple ways to control and deal with consumption of drugs. Several programs are made for drug prevention like.

Family Influence

The prevention of drug abuse first starts from family itself. Family, friends and loved ones plays a major role to keep an addict away from drugs. Parents and friends help them to clearly understand about the consequences of drugs abuse. Promoting protective factors are another safeguards against use of substance and addiction.

Stop Addiction Before It Gets Worse

Treatments are recommended for people who are highly indulged in drug abuse. Medical professionals with proper care are recovered. Detox is completed under the supervision of therapist, which encourages a feeling of good and healthy life.


Conclusion

It's time to stand up for those who were misguided and became a part of an evil act , which harms the mental and physical strength of person. Drug addiction has become a major cause of concern all over the globe. A lot of people do not understand why people get addicted to drugs. However, the root of this evil lies in the disorder and degeneration of our social life. Around 35 million people suffer from drug addiction all over the world. The primary strategy is to enable society the community to handle drug addiction.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree