Skip to main content

Dying Declaration Under the Indian Evidence Act

 Dying Declaration Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872: At a quick Glance


  • What is a dying declaration?

The term "dying declaration" is not properly defined in the Act. It means s declaration made by a person through verbal communications, signs, conduct, or writing soon prior to his death or while he is on his death bed.

  • Relevant provision

Section 32 (1) of the Evidence Act deals with the admissibility of the dying declaration. It states that s statement whether verbal or written made by a person:

  1. Who is dead,

  2. Who cannot be found,

  3. whose presence is not possible in court without arbitrary delay is admissible when it relates to the reason of death.


  • Essentials of dying declaration

  1. The dying declaration must connect with the reason for his death only or refer to the situation/transaction which caused his death.

  2. The person making the declaration must be found dead after making such a statement. In case the person isn't found dead, the statement fails to be called a dying declaration and it might rather be considered as a statement under section 154 Cr.P.C. and 161 Cr.P.C.

  3. There much be the closeness in time in making the declaration and the time of death. This is very necessary while deciding whether the statement will fall in this category or not.

  4. The declarant must be mentally well and should be fully aware and be able to analyze the results of making his statement while giving it. It isn't important that the fact of mental fitness be approved by the doctor, however, if there is a medical certificate, then it proves to be more efficient and effective.

  5. A dying declaration can be made to any person: a magistrate, a doctor, police personnel, a friend, or any other person. However, if it is recorded under a magistrate then it is considered more authentic and reliable.

  6. The statement must not be vague and be complete. An incomplete statement will leave a loophole and more chances of fabrication thus, an incomplete statement will not be admissible.

  7. The declarant must be capable as a witness. 

  8. It is not important that the declarant is under the prediction of death while giving the statement.


  • Other important points

  • The term dying declaration is based on the maxim "Nemo moriturus presumuntur mentri" which means no one on the death bed is considered to be lying.

  • The dying declaration should be voluntary.

  • The person to whom statement/declaration is made or who records such declaration is known as a scribe.

  • As of the usual rule, hearsay evidence is irrelevant under the Indian Evidence Act. An exception of the hearsay rule is a dying declaration.

  • There is no rule of law that states that no conviction can be entirely based on the grounds of a dying declaration unless it is established with independent evidence. Thus, where a statement is full and reliable to the satisfaction of the courts, the courts can condemn a person on the grounds of a dying declaration.

  • The courts must work with caution while depending on a dying declaration as such statement is indirect but coming from a person who has either written or heard it, therefore there are chances of manipulation/filtration in the statement.

  • Dying declaration helps safeguard conviction in cases like dowry deaths, etc, where unambiguous evidence isn't available.

  • The statement must be explanatory as to the reason for the death of the declarant.

  • Such a statement is relevant in both civil and criminal proceedings.

  • A suicide note is not considered a dying declaration.

  • A signature of the declarant isn't necessary on the declaration. But it is effective to turn the statement into writing and a getting declarant's signator on it so as to reduce the chances of unnecessary exaggerations.

  • Where there is more than one dying declaration, then it is the liability of the Court to observe and scrutinize which of the declaration it should depend on.


  • FIR and Complaint as a dying declaration

An injured informant who gives a statement to the police as to the committing of an offense and dies after that, such statement can be considered as a dying declaration if it connects with the reason for the informant's death.

In a similar manner, a complaint by a person can be called a dying declaration if he dies after reporting the complaint and the complaint related to the cause of his death.


  • Relevant case laws

  1. Queen Empress v. Abdullah

This is one of the prominent case laws on the concept of dying declaration in which it has stated that there is no specific form of recording dying declaration. It can be through signs, conduct, or gestures as well.


  1. Khushal Rao v. the State of Bombay

The Supreme Court followed the principles established by the Privy Council in the case of Pakala Narayan Swami v, Emperor, which consists inter alia the following:

  • A dying declaration is not a fragile kind of evidence.

  • A dying declaration cannot be compared with the confession of a co-accused as it may not come from fabricated sources.

  • The importance of corroboration doesn't rise from the frangibleness of a dying declaration but from the fact that in a specific case, the specific declaration is not free from affliction.

 


Written by Parul Sharma.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more