Skip to main content

Entertainment Law- An Insight- by Vedant Karia at LexCliq

 Entertainment Law- An Insight- by Vedant Karia at LexCliq

Entertainment includes movies, TV shows, plays, and concerts. Glory, imagination, creativity and hard work.

Entertainment law is also known as Media Law. It deals with entertainment and media legal services.

The Media and Entertainment Industry (M&E) has grown in importance in recent years. It is estimated to bring in USD 35 million. Suppliers and consumers are increasingly using the internet in the M&E industry.

M&E is a broad sector with high potential for abuse. Various laws with varying goals have been enacted to regulate effectively. The Cinematograph Act of 1952, the Cable Television Network Regulation Act of 1995, and the Information Technology Act of 2000 regulate content on exhibition mediums like cinemas, television, and the internet.

The Copyright Act of 1957 and the Trademarks Act of 1999 protect intellectual properties like trademarks and copyrights. Defamation, religious sentiments, etc. are all punishable under the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The first concern in M&E is freedom of speech and censorship. Article 19 of the Indian Constitution guarantees freedom of communication and expression via electronic media and publications. Article 19 guarantees freedom of expression as part of the right to self-development.

While the legal side of entertainment may not be as glamorous as the actual production, it is still a very important aspect of the industry. Entertainment law covers the entire entertainment and media industries. Everything falls under the umbrella of entertainment law, from fighting for free speech to negotiating for talent. Skills such as contract drafting, negotiation, communication, analytical approach, critical thinking, etc. are vital in the field of entertainment law, as well.

As media became more popular, so did the field of media law, leaving some corporate professionals wanting to participate more in media. As a result, many young lawyers went into media law to network, become a media presenter, or even act. As technology advances, more lawsuits are filed, necessitating the need for lawyers.

Entertainment law isn't a distinct legal field. It is a fusion of traditional legal disciplines like contract, IP, and business law.

Role of Entertainment Lawyers

  • Drafting contracts

  • Facilitating negotiations

  • Connecting clients with other service providers

  • Adviser

  • Protecting intellectual property

  • Provide representation

  • Developing financing agreements for various loans, sponsorships, grants, and other forms of funding. 

 

As you can see, an entertainment lawyer's role is often quite broad, making them an invaluable asset to have on your side if you work in the entertainment industry. The following are some of the areas that lawyers may handle for each industry:

To draught and negotiate contracts, facilitate funding processes, manage and acquire talent, litigate and protect their Intellectual Property Rights are some of the tasks that legal departments assist business teams with. These houses work with outside law firms to understand business-related legal requirements. Thus, in-house lawyers for media or entertainment companies must understand their businesses in order to effectively advise and protect their interests. By bridging assignments with legal departments, these in-house counsels gain expertise in various areas of the entertainment industry, paving the way to general counsel.

Alternatively, an entertainment lawyer may be part of a media and entertainment law firm. Essentially, they get to act as an external counsel for the media house. The benefit of being an entertainment and media lawyer in a law firm is that you get to work with multiple clients and represent various media outlets and celebrities at the same time.

As entertainment evolves, so does the law. With the current advancement of technology, people are becoming more interested in discovering new forms of entertainment like web series, OTT platforms, etc. Thus, the role and responsibilities of an entertainment lawyer will continue to evolve and change. Overall, an entertainment lawyer's role and responsibilities are unique and vital today.


Vedant Karia
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more