Skip to main content

Importance of Vaccination

 We often develop a lifelong immune system when we have a disease. However, other diseases can cause serious problems and sometimes even death. The purpose of the vaccine is to diagnose the disease without risking it. When we vaccinate, we make a "memory" of the immune system. During vaccination, a weak microbe, piece, or something similar, is added to the body. The immune system then works without making us sick. Some dangerous infectious diseases can be prevented in a simple and effective way. In some diseases, vaccination provides lifelong protection, while in others the effect decreases after a few years and booster doses are needed.

We often develop a lifelong immune system when we have a disease. However, other diseases can cause serious problems and sometimes even death. The purpose of the vaccine is to diagnose the disease without risking it. When we vaccinate, we make a "memory" of the immune system. During vaccination, a weak microbe, piece, or something similar, is added to the body. The immune system then works without making us sick. Some dangerous infectious diseases can be prevented in a simple and effective way. In some diseases, vaccination provides lifelong protection, while in others the effect decreases after a few years and booster doses are needed. In the uterus, our immune system is ready to fight off the various viruses that we encounter after birth. Since vaccines use only a small part of a child's immune system, the immune system is heavier than normal infections, such as the flu. Infants are therefore more tolerant of vaccinations, which includes getting several vaccines at the same time.

When more people are vaccinated against the disease, fewer people will be infected. This protects a few who have not been vaccinated.

With the help of vaccines, it is possible to completely eradicate other diseases worldwide. To date, this has been achieved through smallpox.

During vaccination, the body is exposed to a weak microbe (bacteria or virus), pieces of microbe, or something like a microbe. When the active ingredients in the vaccine come in contact with the immune system, the immune cells and the immune system produced will see a "real" microbe. When an infected person is exposed to the virus, the immune system will provide a faster and better immune response that can prevent infections. This is a valid vaccine that has been obtained through practice.

A good vaccine will provide adequate and long-term protection against the disease. The amount of doses required varies depending on the vaccine. In some vaccines, there is a need for a booster dose later in life to maintain protection. These include vaccines for tetanus, diphtheria, polio and pertussis. Booster doses may be required for walking vaccines.

When the body is infected with a microbe (virus, bacterium, parasite or fungus), it stimulates the production of vital body cells. After a recovery, some immune cells will “remember” these viruses. This is called immunological memory. The next time a body is exposed to the same germs, the immune system will recognize it. The immune system is faster and stronger and can prevent a person from getting sick. This is a function of natural insecurity.

What does vaccination protect you from:

protect you and your baby from many serious and dangerous deadly diseases

Protect other people in your community - by helping to prevent the spread of disease to people who cannot get vaccinated

They are tested for strict security before being introduced - they are regularly monitored to detect negative results after presentation

sometimes it causes side effects that do not last long - some children may feel unwell and have a sore arm for two or three days.

reduce or eliminate some diseases - if not enough people are vaccinated
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more