Skip to main content

Kinds of law

  KINDS OF LAW  


Generally, there are many kinds of law which has been practising in India. In this article we are going to see some of the types of law. 


Public law: 

Public law is a branch of law which determines and regulates the organization and functioning of the State. It regulates the relation of the state with its subjects. Public law includes of constitutional law, Administrative law, criminal law, municipal law and international law. Criminal law will be enforced by the separate states under their control. 

Private law: 

Private law is the branch of law which regulates the relation of the citizens with one another. This private law mainly consists of the rights and duties of the persons and the individuals. Under the private law, the legal action is begun by the private citizen or a group of citizens. This kind of law includes contract, torts, Property laws, Succession laws and religion and family laws. This is also known as the civil laws. 

General law: 

General laws are the laws that consists of ordinary procedure and does not require any special condition for its enforcement and it is basically of three kinds, statutory law, law of equity and Common law. 

Special law: 

Special laws consists of legal rules which apply under special conditions. They are special and exceptional in their nature, sources or application. Hence it is treated outside the general and common law. The main types of special laws are local law, territorial law, personal law, conventional law, autonomous law, martial law, prize law, constitutional law, International law and Administrative law. 

  1. Local law:

       Local laws are special laws that applicable only for the particular place of the state. It is mostly customary by practice over long time. It may be also by enacted laws. Local customary law has its source in immemorial customs observed for an indefinite period in a particular locality. Example: certain functions and traditions in separate cities, and procedure of municipalities and corporations. 


  1. Territorial law: 

        Territorial law is a lex loci. It applies to all persons living in the territory of the state irrespective of their personal status. The law of contract, IPC, CRPC and CPC are some of the examples of territorial laws. 


  1. Conventional law: 

       Conventional law was generally stated as the agreement and contracts that binds the parties. Here the parties have voluntarily agreed to observe the law specified by the terms and conditions. The contract act is the best example for this law. 


  1. Martial law: 

       Martial law means the military law governing the armed forces at times of peace and war. Martial law is used for the suppression of ordinary law by military tribunals for the restoration of order and lawful authority. Martial law cannot be exercised in time of peace and it can only be administered at times of war. 


  1. Personal law : 

       This law arises by custom, usage of people of a particular religion like Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Parsis and others. Example: Hindu law is the example of the personal law. It is a law of personal status and its applicability is dependent upon the person being a Hindu. 


Comments

  1. Thanks for publishing such great information. You are doing such a great job. This information is very helpful for everyone. Keep sharing about legal permanent residency attorney. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This information is so useful and informative which you have shared here. It is beneficial for beginners to develop their knowledge. It is very gainful information. Thanks for sharing Birth Injury Lawyer San Diego.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I admire this article for the well-researched content and excellent wording. Injury Lawyer Hilton Head. I got so involved in this material that I couldn’t stop reading. I am impressed with your work and skill. Thank you so much.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You wrote this post very carefully. The amount of information is stunning and also a gainful article for us. Keep sharing this kind of articles, Thank you.Criminal Lawyer Chalmette

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for creating such a lovely Blog. Not only is your article helpful, but it is also quite informative on the subject. Keep sharing information of Grant Phillips Law Merchant Cash Advance Attorney, I appreciate it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree