Skip to main content

Memorandum of Understanding sample draft

 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

This Memorandum of Understanding ( hereinafter “ Memorandum ” or “ MOU ”) is entered into and Signed on 31-12-2020 at Mumbai, Maharashtra.

Between

Golden Gym Private Limited, having its registered office at 

351 Raj Niketan , Bapu Vashi Road , Vile Take West

Mumbai

Maharashtra

400056 

Incorporated under the Companies Act 2013, 

CIN Number 461914792

(hereinafter referred to as “ First Party ” which expression shall mean and include its legal heirs, administrators and permitted assigns).

And

Diamond Fitness Private Limited, having its registered office at

37 Narayan Dhruv Lane, Mandvi

Mumbai

Maharashtra

400003

Incorporated under the Companies Act 2013,

CIN Number 746291477

( hereinafter referred to as “ Second party ” which expression shall mean and include its legal heirs, administrators and permitted assigns).

(referred to herein as “Parties ” or individually as “Party ”)

Whereas

  1. The Parties are interested in working together in connection with the Purpose which is described in this Memorandum.

  2. Party 1 an established Gym with Market credibility intend to further expand its business in the city of Mumbai, Maharashtra.

  3. Party 2 a Gym in Mumbai is willing to work with Party 1 and intend to investigate the prospect of working together on this Project. 

  4. Each Party respectively is expected to act in good faith in accordance with this Memorandum .

Now, therefore, in consideration for the mutual promises and convents set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows:

DURATION AND CONSEQUENCES OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING:

  1. This Memorandum will commence on 31-12-2020.

  2. The Parties will negotiate in good faith in order to sign a final and legally binding agreement in relation to the Project ( the “Agreement ”) on or before 31-03-2021.

  3. This Memorandum will remain in effect until otherwise terminated by the Parties.

  4. In the event that this Memorandum is terminated neither Party will incur any financial liability to the other Party.

  5. In the Event that this Memorandum is terminated this Memorandum will continue for the time periods as provided in the Memorandum. 

PAYMENT :

The Party 2 hereby Agrees to Pay the Party 1 a sum of Rupees 25,00,000/- ( Twenty Five Lakhs ) in order to continue their arrangement. And further enter into a Franchisee Agreement.


TERMINATION: 

  1. The Parties may terminate this Memorandum by mutual agreement.

  2. Either Party may terminate this Memorandum by providing 1 month notice in writing to the other Party .

  3. Neither Party will, under this Memorandum will incur any financial liability in case of the termination.

  4. Possession of any Equipment, Materials , Documents, Data or other information that are the property of the Parties must be promptly returned or destroyed as per the directions of the Parties. 

BEST EFFORTS:

Each Party shall use their best efforts to complete all actions initiated by them and do all the necessary tasks/objectives that are required for the Project and Comply with the terms of the Memorandum. The Parties must mutually cooperate in order to work effectively and efficiently towards the Objectives. Each Party shall promptly consult with each other and provide any required data, information and material if required and necessary to carry forward the work.

CONFIDENTIALITY:

  1. This “ Confidentiality” clause is intended to be legally binding on the Parties herein.

  2. The Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that in relation with this Memorandum, they may have access to information that is confidential and is commercially valuable to one or more of other Parties.

  3. In relation to any confidential information the receiving Party shall keep the Confidential information confidential and secret.

  4. The Receiving Party shall only use the confidential information for the Purpose of working in good motive on the Project in accordance with this Memorandum.

  5. The Receiving Party shall not release the confidential to any other party.

  6. Each Party’s respective obligations of Confidentiality under this clause will survive the termination or expiration of this Memorandum and will continue after that Party ceases to participate in the Project.



Signed By the Parties this 31-12-2020

________

Golden Gym Private limited 

 

 

________

Diamond Fitness Private limited
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more