Skip to main content

Military Laws in India-by Vedant Karia at LexCliq

 Military Laws in India-by Vedant Karia at LexCliq

Military law governs the Army, Navy, and Air Force. Militia laws give soldiers special powers and bind their conduct Soldiers' rights are restricted and enhanced under military law. A soldier or a bureau worker cannot go to the High Court or the Supreme Court if their fundamental rights are restricted by special acts like military laws, according to the Indian Constitution.

Navy Act 

  1. Before India accomplished freedom, the Naval Forces were being represented by the Indian Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934,  which was passed as per segment 66 of the Government of India Act, 1919. 

  2. Later on, the act was replaced by the Naval Forces, brought up in India-the arrangements of the Naval Discipline Act 1866. Likewise, the U.K. The Maritime Discipline Act was adjusted and the Indian Navy Discipline Act, 1934 was authorized. Several constitutional changes were made. Because of this, it was felt important to change the enactment identifying with Naval Forces. 

  3. Meanwhile, in 1950 the modified Army Act and Air Force Act were relaxed; it was unrealistic to modify the law managing the Naval Forces as the then existing Indian Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934 depended on the Corresponding British Act.

Army Act

India has various legislation for its military, and one most important legislation is the Army Act. This act was enacted in 1950, and it applies to soldiers who are enrolled under this Act and to the soldiers who belong to the Indian reserve force.

Air Force Act

The Air Force Act was commenced around the year 1950 and applies to soldiers who are enrolled under this Act and to the soldiers who belong to the Indian reserve force.

In India, certain Para-military forces have laws almost like people who apply to defence services. These include:

• The Border Private Security Power Act,

• The Coast Guard Act, 

• The Border Police Act of Indo-Tibet 

• The Assam Rifles Act.

The Military Act replaced those Acts. After the 1857 Mutiny, the British created military value to empower Indian discipline. Aim of the Indian Army Act 1950, the Navy Act 1957, and the Air Force Act 1950.

Bail is not an option for a military official. Bail may be granted by military superiors, but only on their authority. The Supreme Court has established standard principles for granting bail. However, providing bail requires authority, which seems unfair.

Military law prohibits an offender from hiring a civil lawyer or being defended by a defending official. This causes a lack of legal aid services, which is a constitutional right. (Constitutional Article 21)

The Indian Army is governed by military law, which includes statutes, rules, and regulations. The composing code has undergone periodic reviews, aside from administrative conventions. Soldiers have their own justice system that is distinct from the general justice system. The military's legal and justice system was designed to be quick to deal with trains and avoid long absences of military and military duties from officials. The appeals system, which is part of the civil system, has thus been excluded from the military justice framework.

Vedant Karia
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more