Skip to main content

Mob Lynching

The Menace of Mob lynching in India

By Shreya Verma

Lynching is execution of a person without proper legal trial or procedure. Mob lynching is set execution by mob that is, set a people who are strangers to each other. If such people are strangers, then why would the act as Union? Reason for the same is given by Prof. Singhel and his book "the Criminal crowd and psychology of sects" he says that a member of a mob by their" sudden Mob Lynchingorganisation caused by Spark of passion spring up from one of them, electrifies this disorder in such a manner that the mob acts like a single being". 

India, which is well known for its tolerance is Losing its characteristic trait with time. Youth of today is growing seeing violence as a part of solution of a problem in many situations leading to de-establishment of nonviolence tolerance principle that were instated since ages. Recently, many cases of mob lynching have emerged in states like Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand, Rajasthan etc. A recent case of 21 years old Tabrez Ansari in Jharkhand who was beaten up to date for charges of theft. 

Supreme Court in Tehseen S. Poonawala vs. Union of India (2008) held that "horrendous acts of mobocracy cannot be new normal way of life". It has issued guidelines to state to prevent the acts of mob lynching: 

(1) to constitutes a Special Task Force by Nodal Officer, who is not below the rank of Superintendent of Police and his work shall be to prevent instances of dissemination of offensive materials through different social media and other means. 

(2) to empower of jurisdictional police station to lodge immediate FIR in cases of such incidences and the Station House Officer shall immediately intimate the same to Nodal Officer who shall ensure the safety of family members of the victims. 

(3) nodal Officer must ensure investigation, prosecution of such cases to be carried on and charge sheet to be filed within the prescribed time and trial conducted within a period of 6 months. 

(4) dissemination of consequences of taking law in Hands by State/ Central government. 

However, despite these guidelines issued a decade ago the toll of mob lynching death in 4 years have reached 266 till June 2019. 

Some of the reasons for mobocracy/ ochlocracy may be determined as follows: 

- Mob lynching is not always wise to show pad for psychopath they are the people amongst us but are derived passionately by such anonymity that they lose their personal individuality, leading to form a collective identity. 

- Extraordinary intolerance, ridiculous pride, sense of responsibility and Illusion of being all powerful and loss of sense of derived by exalted emotions of the mob are the key features of mobocracy. 

- When derived by such emotions person loses personal sense of moral is strength and reduction of individual reasonability. 

- In his book, " less than human: Why we demean enslave and exterminate others", Homer-Dixon has stated that, " those who commit more violence and guided by group loyalties consider themselves as higher and others less humans. This mentality is also what leads to form of common will between the lynchers against the victims. 

Understanding the present scenario, it is the need of the Hour that mob lynching should be made a separate crime as they are now covered under the provision of unlawful assembly under section 149 of Indian penal code read along with crying which the mop together has actually done, for example, culpable homicide or grievous hurt. 

Recently Uttar Pradesh government has come up with a draft bill which proposes seven years of imprisonment for the offenders and three years to the police officers who do not perform their duties. 

There is a need for central law to prevent the atrocity which along with providing punitive measures should also deal with the factors which are the product of human strength and behaviour that leads to such a characteristic and also provide institutional or psychological or reformative help to the offenders.   

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more