Skip to main content

Natural law school

  NATURAL LAW SCHOOL 


Natural law is based on human reasoning. Augustine defines it as ‘eternal law’ in the divine order or will of God which requires the preservation of natural order and forbids the breach of it. It is inherent in the nature of man and it enables the man to distinguish the good from evil and right from wrong. Here in this article we can see about the stages of development in the Natural law school. 

Natural law in Ancient Greece: 

The Natural law began in Greece about 2,500 years ago. There was Homer’s theory in the 8th century BC. It said that the divinity of justice was with the King and there should be unquestionable obedience by the people. This did not satisfy the thinkers. It was Haraculitus who was first tuned to law of Nature to find a ‘standard justice’. The Greek concept of Natural Law explained that man unlike animals, is endowed with reasoning power. 


Natural Law in Rome (Jus Gentium): 

The Roman Natural law was known as ‘Jus Gentium’. As the Civil Law of Rome applied only to Roman citizens, the Natural law namely Jus Gentium was applied to all Non-Romans. The Jus Gentium was a code of natural laws commonly observed by many Roman people. Slowly, the jus Gentium was also applied to make the Roman law less rigid. The Roman’s Jus Gentium could not be equated to Natural law, because Romans practised slavery which was against Natural law. 

Natural law during Medieval days: 

During this period, Rome lost its supremacy and the Christian churches began to assert their religious dominance over the State. They considered that the Law of God was superior to King made law and so the church interfered and override the State laws. Slowly, both the State and church invoked the Natural law to support their assertions over each other.

Natural law during Middle ages: 

  1. Thirteenth century

Towards the middle of 13th century, St. Thomas Aquinas by his Scholastic theory of Law said that divine law is revealed in the inherent reasoning of man and is called the Natural law. So long as the main laws were for common good of the society, they were in conformity with the Divine law. 


  1. Sixteenth century: 

During the 16th century, with the discovery of new continents, commerce expanded and the commercial class of people wanted protection of their increasing property interests. They all appealed to Natural Law in justification of their claims. Thus Natural law was no longer a Divine law, but became the Law of reason with the intellectual outlook. 


  1. Seventeenth century: 

In 17th century, Hugo Grotius, the Father of International Law framed a system of International law based on the Natural law. According to him, ‘the law of nations is the law of Nature applied to international level’. In this connection, Sir Henry Maine observes ‘the greatest function of Natural law was discharged by giving birth to International law’. 


Natural Law in modern period: 

  1. 18th century: 

The Natural law was also used against political tyranny in 18th century. In the American war of Independence 1776 and the French Revolution 1789, the Natural law curtailed the unlimited power of the Government over people. This gave rise to the Natural law principle that social contract must be respected (pacta sunt servanda). 

  1. 19th century: 

In the 19th Century, the Natural law theory began to recede to the back ground due to the concepts of neutralism, scientific reasoning, sociological approach to human problems etc.

  1. 20th Century: 

With the dawn of the 20th century, the Natural law one again got revied, since the legislative laws brough in stagnation in the legal system. The ‘Nazi Statutory Laws’ in Germany during II World War failed to secure even the elementary justice to people and hence it was revolted by the people as violative of Natural law.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree