Skip to main content

Plato's justice theory

 PLATO’S JUSTICE THEORY


Platonic conception of justice is criticized by several on the subsequent grounds: consistent with critics Plato’s conception of justice lacks legal sanction. the complete conception of justice rests on moral principles. it's supported self-control and self-rejection for the sake of the society. Our experience shows that at no stage of history solely ethical principles has been ready to shield social good. 

Secondly, consistent with critics, Plato’s views that every category ought to specialize in development of their distinctive qualities, namely, the ruling class- the spirit of knowledge, the military category the spirit of courageousness, and also the manufacturing category the spirit of craving can't be all accepted. This is as a result of such Associate in Nursing angle wouldn't enable the individual to develop his temperament all. Rather, the individual would solely develop third of his temperament. third Plato’s justice would pave the approach for difference in society. consistent with critics such a conception of justice 

would increase the likelihood of difference of power and privilege in society. Fourthly according to academic Karl Popper, Plato’s conception of justice ignores the humanitarian principles like equality, freedom and individualism. mental object towards these principles would make the system totalitarian. Fifthly, the individualist thinkers refuse to just accept Plato’s conception of justice on the bottom that it reduces the individual to a mere means that for the promotion of the interest of the society. Sixthly, consistent with the critics, Plato’s theory of justice is static because it doesn't enable a person to alter his profession. Seventhly, Plato’s justice doesn't provide recognition to the conception of rights however of duties. the complete notion of justice is simply too passive in character. That everybody ought to mind his business is Associate in Nursing admirable perception however it can't be accepted as justice within the true sense of the term. However, despite criticisms, Plato’s conception of justice holds connection because it is thought to be the premise of a regular society and social relationships. It is expected that if all the inhabitants of a state may well be imbued with this sense of justice and honest play, universal happiness may well be achieved. Plato was greatly influenced by his teacher and mentor philosopher. Besides Socrates the writing of philosopher, Parmenides, Associate in Nursing philosopher conjointly had an influence in Plato’s philosophy and thought. From philosopher he picked up the thought of knowledge and reincarnation of soul, from philosopher ‘Plato engineered up the notion’ that nothing is permanent during this world, from Parmenides, he leant that reality is eternal. What conjointly influenced Plato’s thoughts were the wars to that he was a witness. The defeat of Athens in wars against Spartans, the Macedonian militarism, the execution of his mentor ‘Socrates’- of these events greatly disturbed, so much so that he started out to in look for a perfect kind of government. the end result was ‘rule of philosopher king’. Again, the execution of Socrates’ had created him a rebel of democracy. The perspective of ‘Justice’ occupies a really vital place in Plato’s political thought therefore important for Plato subtitled his masterpiece ‘Republic’ as regarding ‘Justice’. Plato used the term justice in a very wide sense.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more