Skip to main content

Relative incapacity in Muslim law

 Relative incapacity in Muslim law 

There are situations in which the marriage is considered to be irregular as long as the irregularity exist. The moment such defects are removed the marriage becomes valid and binding.

According to the Muslim law it is absolutely necessary that the parties to the marriage or someone on their marriage in presences of witnesses should agree to the marriage at one sitting. The agent of the party to the marriage also known as vakil, takes the permission from the parties concern to authorised them as the agent and explains to the girl the dower amount by then girl signifies her consent in presences of the witness and the vakil, kazi who conveys the message to both and when his offer is accepted by the other party the marriage becomes final and binding.

In case of Rashid Khatoon v. SK. Islam, the Orissa high court held that their was no specified to the offer to marry and only an assurances is given and based on such assurances party start cohabiting that will not give the girl as the wife. 

Such situation are as follows-

Unlawful conjunction

It means that a man marring with two women who are related to each other by consanguinity, affinity, fosterage. However, this bar could be removed by divorcing one of them or when one of them is dead. 

Marring a fifth wife 

Under Shia law marriage with a fifth wife is regular but in Sunni it is considered to be irregular, it can only be removed by divorcing any of the former 4th wife. 

 Absences of proper witness 

In the Sunni law at the time of marriage there should be a witness of 2 male or one male and 2 female witness. Absences of any witness would affect the contractual agreement in its completion process and it will make the marriage irregular, such irregularity can be removed by pronouncing the word ijab or qubool in the presences of any witnesses. 

Differences of religion 

In a Sunni law a man cannot marry an idol worshipper and a fire worshiper. However, if the man does it then marriage is considered to be irregular but in Shia law it is completely void. But a Muslim women cannot marry to any man who is not a Muslim as per the holy Quran completely void.

Women under iddat 

Iddat is a period during which a woman is prohibited from marrying again after the dissolution of her first marriage either due to divorce or death, of the husband. The main objective of iddat is to ensure the parentage of the child to avoid any sort of confusion.

The duration iddat are as follows-:

In case of: 

1)Widow hood - 4 months 2 days

2)Pregnancy: till the delivery of child or her miscarriage. If the delivery or miscarriage happen before or remain periods then the remaining periods shall be the iddat.

3) talak: 3 months

4) If the marriage is irregular and if the marriage has not been consummated then the iddat period is not compulsory.

5) the period of iddat begins from the date of death or divorce from the husband and not from the date when she gets the information. The iddat will be counted from the former date.

If the wife observes iddat the husband is bound to maintain her during the period of iddat under the provision of Muslim law. The Muslim woman + (protection of rights on divorce at 986).

If the husbands have 4 wives’ including the divorced one, he cannot marry from the 5th time until the iddat Period of the divorced wife is over. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree