Skip to main content

Torture, terrorism and police

 TORTURE, TERRORISM AND POLICE

There can be no benefit announcing that freedom of a character has to yield to be safety of the kingdom. The Courts have upheld the right of preventive detention of people in the interest of safety of the kingdom in various conditions prescribed under distinct statutes. The proper to interrogate the detenus, culprits or arrestees within the hobby of the country, should take precedence over a character's proper to private liberty. The Latin maxim Salus populi Est suprema lex (the safety of the people is the ultimate regulation) and Salus republican Est suprema lex (protection of the country is the preferred regulation) co-exist and are not handiest crucial
and applicable but lie at the coronary heart of the doctrine that the welfare of an individual need to yield to that of the community. The movement of the kingdom, however, must be "proper, simply and fair". using any form of torture for extracting any type of records could neither be 'right nor just nor honest' and, therefore, could be impermissible, being offensive to Article 21. Such against the law-suspect have to be interrogated - indeed subjected to sustained and scientific interrogation - decided in accordance with the provision of law. He cannot, but, be tortured or subjected to third diploma methods or removed so that you can elicit records, extract confession or drive information approximately his accomplices, guns etc.
Terrorism is an act, which goals to create worry amongst normal human beings via unlawful method. it's miles a danger to humanity. It consists of man or woman or group spreading violence, riots, burglaries, rapes, kidnappings, fighting, bombings, etc. Terrorism is an act of cowardice. additionally, terrorism has nothing to do with religion. A terrorist is most effective a terrorist, no longer a Hindu or a Muslim.
His Constitutional right cannot be abridged besides inside the manner authorized with the aid of law, even though within the very nature of factors there could be qualitative difference within the technique of interrogation of such a person in comparison to a normal crook. challenge of terrorism ought to be met with modern thoughts and approach. nation terrorism is not any answer to combat terrorism. country terrorism would handily offer legitimacy to 'terrorism'. that could be horrific for the kingdom, the community and above eager about the guideline of regulation. The country needs to, therefore, ensure that diverse groups deployed by using it for preventing terrorism act in the bounds of regulation and now not become regulation unto them. That the terrorist has violated human rights of innocent residents can also render him chargeable for punishment however it cannot justify the violation of his human rights except in the way approved by law. want, consequently, is to expand medical techniques of investigation and educate the investigators nicely to interrogate to meet the undertaking.

Terrorist groups have developed a myriad of means to secure the resourcing they need to survive, from the earliest bank robberies to today’s highly sophisticated identity theft and money laundering scams. Successful terrorist groups are learning organizations, taking the talents inherent within the group and the menu of choices available and adapting them on the basis of their own experience and that of other groups to continue to survive and operate.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree