Skip to main content

Trade Unions in India

 Trade Unions in India

By Nemi Bhavsar

India's trade unions have gone a long way since the first organised trade union, the Madras Labour Union, one of the first unions, was created in 1918. There are about 84,642 registered trade unions in India, with many unregistered trade unions distributed throughout various industries. India is predicted to have a working population of more than 64 per cent by 2021. Therefore, the potential for development in trade union-represented workers is enormous.

History of Trade Unions in India

Workers in India founded a few associations at the turn of the century to increase their negotiating power over service conditions and wages. The Printers' Union, founded in Calcutta in 1905, and the Bombay Postal Union, founded in 1907, were first. The Madras Labour Union being the oldest was founded in 1918[3], the All India Trade Union Congress ("AITUC") was founded in 1920, the Bengal Trade Union Federation was founded in 1922, and the All India Railwaymen's Federation was founded in 1922. Shri N.M.


The AITUC's General Secretary, Joshi, urged that the government create legislation for the registration and protection of trade unions in India in a resolution in March 1921. The Labour Unions Act of 1926 ("TU Act") was eventually established to ensure the control and protection of trade unions. The Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh ("BMS"), the Indian National Trade Union Congress ("INTUC"), and the All India Trade Union Congress ("AITUC") are the three major trade unions in India today.

Laws Governing Trade Unions In India

1] Constitution of India, 1950

Article 19(1) (c) of the Constitution of India, 1950 guarantees citizens the right "to create associations or unions," including trade unions. It also guarantees citizens the right "to form associations or unions."The Supreme Court ruled that the freedom to join an association or union is included in Article 19(1) (c). This right consists of the State's ability to set reasonable limits.

 

2] Trade Unions Act, 1926

The Trade Unions Act of 1926 (the TU Act) governs the establishment and registration of trade unions, as well as the law governing registered trade unions. "Any combinations, whether temporary or permanent, formed primarily to regulate the relations between workers and employers, or between employers and employers, or for imposing restrictions on the conduct of any trade, and includes any federation or two or more trade unions," according to the Trade Unions Act.

 

3] Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

The IDA oversees the rights of employers and employees in the investigation and settlement of industrial disputes, which includes trade unions. It allows for collective bargaining through negotiation and mediation, or, if that fails, voluntary arbitration or compulsory adjudication with trade union participation. According to the IDA, a settlement reached through collective bargaining is legally binding. Two types of settlements are:

  • Those concluded via conciliation processes before the authorities - such settlements bind both members and non-members of the signatory union and all current and prospective management workers.

  • Those achieved outside of conciliation proceedings but signed independently by the parties to the settlement; such settlements bind only those members who are signatories or parties to the agreement.

Landmark Cases About Trade Unions In India

1] All India Bank Employees' Association v. N.I.Tribunal 

The case laid down the rights of members of trade unions that are covered under the fundamental right to freedom of expression and speech under Article 19(1) (c). However, the court ruled that Article 19(1) (c) does not include a right to achieving all the goals for which the trade union was created. The ruling also ruled that adequate industrial legislation can govern or restrict trade union strikes.

 

2] Balmer Lawrie Workers' Union, Bombay and Anr. v. Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. and Ors 

The SC's underlying assumption was that a recognised union represents all workers in a particular industrial project or industry. In the MRF United Workers case, this matter was also mentioned.

 

3] Kalindi and Others v. Tata Locomotive and Engineering Co. Ltd 

The Supreme Court concluded that there is no right to representation unless it recognises it through its standing orders. In Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Maharashtra General Kamgar Union & Others, the decision was upheld.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree