Skip to main content

What are illegal and void contracts?

 


What are illegal and void contracts? 

By swatee shukla 

A contract is simply an agreement between two or more persons that is made enforceable by law. Any agreement enforceable by law between two or more parties will be a contract; unless it is expressly barred by the Indian contract act, or is invalid because either the object or the consideration is illegal. Thus, a contract, which is barred by the Indian contract act or suffers from an inherent defect because the consideration or the object is illegal, if entered into would fall in the category of illegal contracts. Such contact is considered in law as a void contract. A void contract is one such contract that is not prohibited by law but has no legal effect for it. On the other hand, an illegal contract is one that has no legal effect and is also prohibited by law. There may be free consent, parties may be competent, consideration may be lawful, but when the purpose of the agreement is unlawful or illegal, the agreement will be void. 

There are two things to keep in mind for a contract to be valid first the agreement must have a lawful object (lawful object means not barred by law) and must be accomplished by lawful means. Second, the consideration agreed upon must be lawful and not illegal. 

Consideration /object of an agreement is considered lawful when:

  • The consideration is not forbidden by law: for example, contracts to sell smuggled goods, to launder black money, to kill a person are all forbidden by law.

  • The consideration should not be of such a nature that if permitted, it would defeat the provision of any law. For example an agreement between two parties that one property would hold the Benami property on behalf of another in return for some services, this agreement would be void as it intends to defraud the legal system.

  • The consideration of an agreement is considered lawful when it is not made to avoid a process of law and not to commit fraud. 

  • If the consideration of an agreement is to cause an injury to the person or property of another, the agreement is unlawful and therefore void. In this context, injury means harm which is inflicted upon a third party without lawful justification. 

  • If the consideration or object of an agreement is immoral or opposed to the public policy of the country, the agreement is unlawful. For example, an agreement that involves sexual favor outside marriage would be considered immoral and opposed to public policy, hence unlawful and void. 

Apart from these, there are some specific types of contracts, which are expressly barred by the Indian contract act. These are 1) agreement in restrain of marriage- an agreement which restricts a person’s freedom to choose a marriage partner or to marry in general is expressly stated to be void in the Indian contract act. 2) agreement in restraint of trade- every agreement by which anyone is restrained from exercising a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind, is void to that extent 3) an agreement in restraint of legal proceeding.4) if an agreement is so ambiguous and its terms are so uncertain that it cannot be performed in normal circumstances, then the agreement is void. 5) agreement by way of wager and 6) agreement to do an impossible act. These all types of agreements are barred by the Indian contract act and hence void. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more