Skip to main content

What is the procedure of a civil case?

 


What is the procedure of a civil case? 

By Swatee Shukla

Difference between civil and criminal procedure- Civil procedure captures the body of law that sets out the rules and standards that courts must follow when adjudicating civil lawsuits. These rules govern a vast array of procedures like how a civil lawsuit may be commenced, the types of pleadings, applications, and orders allowed in civil cases, the timing and manner of depositions and discovery of disclosure, the conduct of trials, the process of judgment, etc. a civil lawsuit pertains to private rights and as a contrast to the criminal lawsuit is always initiated by private individuals for their benefit, rather than to punish the individual. A criminal lawsuit on other hand is mostly initiated by the state against an individual in order to punish him. The institution of a civil suit starts with the filing of the plaint. Plaint is a statement of claim, a document, or a memorial that is pleading of the plaintiff.

The civil procedure in India is governed by the civil procedure code of 1908 (CPC or code). The code may be broadly divided into two parts, the first containing 158 sections called the body of the code and the second, containing 51 orders in schedule I, called the rules. The first part lays down the general principles and creates jurisdiction, while the second contains provisions that relate to procedure and indicate the mode in which jurisdiction created by the body of the code has to be exercised. 

Various stages- the first stage of a civil case starts from the filing of a suit, presentation of the plaint in the court is the first step or starting point of all the pleadings in a case in India. one party files a suit in civil court then consideration of plaint by the case takes place, and if the court finds it reasonable, the second stage takes place i.e. issuance of summons. Every suit is instituted after the presentation of the plaint in a prescribed manner.

 After summons are issued to the defended there are two possibilities, either defended appears or the defendant does not appear. If the defendant does not appear, the plaintiff requests an ex-parte decree. (Ex- parte is used to refer to motions for orders that can be granted without waiting for a response from the other side). Further, after recording evidence on the plaintiff and arguments of the plaintiff judgment are passed. Now let’s see what happens when the defendant appears. Defendant has to file a written statement (reply in defense within 30 to 90 days, along with supporting documents evidence. The next stage is the filing of a reply to the written statement of the defendant by the plaintiff, this is called replication by the plaintiff. Then the examination of parties by the court takes place to ascertain from each party or his pleader whether he admits or denies such allegations of facts as made in the plaint and written statement. Then the stages of admission of documents filed by both the parties, production of documents, and framing of issues by court take place. And these issues are the backbone of the suit. After the framing of issues parties shall present in the court a list of witnesses whom they propose to call.  And then after the examination of witnesses and recording of witnesses and arguments by both parties, the judgment and decree by the court are passed. Now, the other party against whom the judgment is passed can appeal to a higher court within a specified time, if he does not file an appeal then the final stage takes place i.e. execution of the decree for enforcement of the decree/judgment of the court.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree